Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Goldstein, I

Understanding the (In)Effectiveness of Content Moderation: A Case Study of Facebook in the Context of the U.S. Capitol Riot

Authors: Ian Goldstein, Laura Edelson, Minh-Kha Nguyen, Oana Goga, Damon McCoy, Tobias Lauinger

Abstract: Social media networks commonly employ content moderation as a tool to limit the spread of harmful content. However, the efficacy of this strategy in limiting the delivery of harmful content to users is not well understood. In this paper, we create a framework to quantify the efficacy of content moderation and use our metrics to analyze content removal on Facebook within the U.S. news ecosystem. In… ▽ More Social media networks commonly employ content moderation as a tool to limit the spread of harmful content. However, the efficacy of this strategy in limiting the delivery of harmful content to users is not well understood. In this paper, we create a framework to quantify the efficacy of content moderation and use our metrics to analyze content removal on Facebook within the U.S. news ecosystem. In a data set of over 2M posts with 1.6B user engagements collected from 2,551 U.S. news sources before and during the Capitol Riot on January 6, 2021, we identify 10,811 removed posts. We find that the active engagement life cycle of Facebook posts is very short, with 90% of all engagement occurring within the first 30 hours after posting. Thus, even relatively quick intervention allowed significant accrual of engagement before removal, and prevented only 21% of the predicted engagement potential during a baseline period before the U.S. Capitol attack. Nearly a week after the attack, Facebook began removing older content, but these removals occurred so late in these posts' engagement life cycles that they disrupted less than 1% of predicted future engagement, highlighting the limited impact of this intervention. Content moderation likely has limits in its ability to prevent engagement, especially in a crisis, and we recommend that other approaches such as slowing down the rate of content diffusion be investigated. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2023; v1 submitted 6 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Conspiracy Brokers: Understanding the Monetization of YouTube Conspiracy Theories

Authors: Cameron Ballard, Ian Goldstein, Pulak Mehta, Genesis Smothers, Kejsi Take, Victoria Zhong, Rachel Greenstadt, Tobias Lauinger, Damon McCoy

Abstract: Conspiracy theories are increasingly a subject of research interest as society grapples with their rapid growth in areas such as politics or public health. Previous work has established YouTube as one of the most popular sites for people to host and discuss different theories. In this paper, we present an analysis of monetization methods of conspiracy theorist YouTube creators and the types of adv… ▽ More Conspiracy theories are increasingly a subject of research interest as society grapples with their rapid growth in areas such as politics or public health. Previous work has established YouTube as one of the most popular sites for people to host and discuss different theories. In this paper, we present an analysis of monetization methods of conspiracy theorist YouTube creators and the types of advertisers potentially targeting this content. We collect 184,218 ad impressions from 6,347 unique advertisers found on conspiracy-focused channels and mainstream YouTube content. We classify the ads into business categories and compare their prevalence between conspiracy and mainstream content. We also identify common offsite monetization methods. In comparison with mainstream content, conspiracy videos had similar levels of ads from well-known brands, but an almost eleven times higher prevalence of likely predatory or deceptive ads. Additionally, we found that conspiracy channels were more than twice as likely as mainstream channels to use offsite monetization methods, and 53% of the demonetized channels we observed were linking to third-party sites for alternative monetization opportunities. Our results indicate that conspiracy theorists on YouTube had many potential avenues to generate revenue, and that predatory ads were more frequently served for conspiracy videos. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Journal ref: WWW 2022 Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference, April 2022, Pages 2707-2718

On the Hardness of Set Disjointness and Set Intersection with Bounded Universe

Authors: Isaac Goldstein, Moshe Lewenstein, Ely Porat

Abstract: In the SetDisjointness problem, a collection of $m$ sets $S_1,S_2,...,S_m$ from some universe $U$ is preprocessed in order to answer queries on the emptiness of the intersection of some two query sets from the collection. In the SetIntersection variant, all the elements in the intersection of the query sets are required to be reported. These are two fundamental problems that were considered in sev… ▽ More In the SetDisjointness problem, a collection of $m$ sets $S_1,S_2,...,S_m$ from some universe $U$ is preprocessed in order to answer queries on the emptiness of the intersection of some two query sets from the collection. In the SetIntersection variant, all the elements in the intersection of the query sets are required to be reported. These are two fundamental problems that were considered in several papers from both the upper bound and lower bound perspective. Several conditional lower bounds for these problems were proven for the tradeoff between preprocessing and query time or the tradeoff between space and query time. Moreover, there are several unconditional hardness results for these problems in some specific computational models. The fundamental nature of the SetDisjointness and SetIntersection problems makes them useful for proving the conditional hardness of other problems from various areas. However, the universe of the elements in the sets may be very large, which may cause the reduction to some other problems to be inefficient and therefore it is not useful for proving their conditional hardness. In this paper, we prove the conditional hardness of SetDisjointness and SetIntersection with bounded universe. This conditional hardness is shown for both the interplay between preprocessing and query time and the interplay between space and query time. Moreover, we present several applications of these new conditional lower bounds. These applications demonstrates the strength of our new conditional lower bounds as they exploit the limited universe size. We believe that this new framework of conditional lower bounds with bounded universe can be useful for further significant applications. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Improved Space-Time Tradeoffs for kSUM

Authors: Isaac Goldstein, Moshe Lewenstein, Ely Porat

Abstract: In the kSUM problem we are given an array of numbers $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$ and we are required to determine if there are $k$ different elements in this array such that their sum is 0. This problem is a parameterized version of the well-studied SUBSET-SUM problem, and a special case is the 3SUM problem that is extensively used for proving conditional hardness. Several works investigated the interplay b… ▽ More In the kSUM problem we are given an array of numbers $a_1,a_2,...,a_n$ and we are required to determine if there are $k$ different elements in this array such that their sum is 0. This problem is a parameterized version of the well-studied SUBSET-SUM problem, and a special case is the 3SUM problem that is extensively used for proving conditional hardness. Several works investigated the interplay between time and space in the context of SUBSET-SUM. Recently, improved time-space tradeoffs were proven for kSUM using both randomized and deterministic algorithms. In this paper we obtain an improvement over the best known results for the time-space tradeoff for kSUM. A major ingredient in achieving these results is a general self-reduction from kSUM to mSUM where $m<k$, and several useful observations that enable this reduction and its implications. The main results we prove in this paper include the following: (i) The best known Las Vegas solution to kSUM running in approximately $O(n^{k-δ\sqrt{2k}})$ time and using $O(n^δ)$ space, for $0 \leq δ\leq 1$. (ii) The best known deterministic solution to kSUM running in approximately $O(n^{k-δ\sqrt{k}})$ time and using $O(n^δ)$ space, for $0 \leq δ\leq 1$. (iii) A space-time tradeoff for solving kSUM using $O(n^δ)$ space, for $δ>1$. (iv) An algorithm for 6SUM running in $O(n^4)$ time using just $O(n^{2/3})$ space. (v) A solution to 3SUM on random input using $O(n^2)$ time and $O(n^{1/3})$ space, under the assumption of a random read-only access to random bits. △ Less

Submitted 10 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Orthogonal Vectors Indexing

Authors: Isaac Goldstein, Moshe Lewenstein, Ely Porat

Abstract: In the recent years, intensive research work has been dedicated to prove conditional lower bounds in order to reveal the inner structure of the class P. These conditional lower bounds are based on many popular conjectures on well-studied problems. One of the most heavily used conjectures is the celebrated Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). It turns out that conditional hardness proved base… ▽ More In the recent years, intensive research work has been dedicated to prove conditional lower bounds in order to reveal the inner structure of the class P. These conditional lower bounds are based on many popular conjectures on well-studied problems. One of the most heavily used conjectures is the celebrated Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). It turns out that conditional hardness proved based on SETH goes, in many cases, through an intermediate problem - the Orthogonal Vectors (OV) problem. Almost all research work regarding conditional lower bound was concentrated on time complexity. Very little attention was directed toward space complexity. In a recent work, Goldstein et al.[WADS 2017] set the stage for proving conditional lower bounds regarding space and its interplay with time. In this spirit, it is tempting to investigate the space complexity of a data structure variant of OV which is called \emph{OV indexing}. In this problem $n$ boolean vectors of size $c\log{n}$ are given for preprocessing. As a query, a vector $v$ is given and we are required to verify if there is an input vector that is orthogonal to it or not. This OV indexing problem is interesting in its own, but it also likely to have strong implications on problems known to be conditionally hard, in terms of time complexity, based on OV. Having this in mind, we study OV indexing in this paper from many aspects. We give some space-efficient algorithms for the problem, show a tradeoff between space and query time, describe how to solve its reporting variant, shed light on an interesting connection between this problem and the well-studied SetDisjointness problem and demonstrate how it can be solved more efficiently on random input. △ Less

Submitted 3 October, 2017; v1 submitted 2 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Conditional Lower Bounds for Space/Time Tradeoffs

Authors: Isaac Goldstein, Tsvi Kopelowitz, Moshe Lewenstein, Ely Porat

Abstract: In recent years much effort has been concentrated towards achieving polynomial time lower bounds on algorithms for solving various well-known problems. A useful technique for showing such lower bounds is to prove them conditionally based on well-studied hardness assumptions such as 3SUM, APSP, SETH, etc. This line of research helps to obtain a better understanding of the complexity inside P. A r… ▽ More In recent years much effort has been concentrated towards achieving polynomial time lower bounds on algorithms for solving various well-known problems. A useful technique for showing such lower bounds is to prove them conditionally based on well-studied hardness assumptions such as 3SUM, APSP, SETH, etc. This line of research helps to obtain a better understanding of the complexity inside P. A related question asks to prove conditional space lower bounds on data structures that are constructed to solve certain algorithmic tasks after an initial preprocessing stage. This question received little attention in previous research even though it has potential strong impact. In this paper we address this question and show that surprisingly many of the well-studied hard problems that are known to have conditional polynomial time lower bounds are also hard when concerning space. This hardness is shown as a tradeoff between the space consumed by the data structure and the time needed to answer queries. The tradeoff may be either smooth or admit one or more singularity points. We reveal interesting connections between different space hardness conjectures and present matching upper bounds. We also apply these hardness conjectures to both static and dynamic problems and prove their conditional space hardness. We believe that this novel framework of polynomial space conjectures can play an important role in expressing polynomial space lower bounds of many important algorithmic problems. Moreover, it seems that it can also help in achieving a better understanding of the hardness of their corresponding problems in terms of time. △ Less

Submitted 25 July, 2017; v1 submitted 19 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

How Hard is it to Find (Honest) Witnesses?

Authors: Isaac Goldstein, Tsvi Kopelowitz, Moshe Lewenstein, Ely Porat

Abstract: In recent years much effort was put into develo** polynomial-time conditional lower bounds for algorithms and data structures in both static and dynamic settings. Along these lines we suggest a framework for proving conditional lower bounds based on the well-known 3SUM conjecture. Our framework creates a \emph{compact representation} of an instance of the 3SUM problem using hashing and domain sp… ▽ More In recent years much effort was put into develo** polynomial-time conditional lower bounds for algorithms and data structures in both static and dynamic settings. Along these lines we suggest a framework for proving conditional lower bounds based on the well-known 3SUM conjecture. Our framework creates a \emph{compact representation} of an instance of the 3SUM problem using hashing and domain specific encoding. This compact representation admits false solutions to the original 3SUM problem instance which we reveal and eliminate until we find a true solution. In other words, from all \emph{witnesses} (candidate solutions) we figure out if an \emph{honest} one (a true solution) exists. This enumeration of witnesses is used to prove conditional lower bound on \emph{reporting} problems that generate all witnesses. In turn, these reporting problems are reduced to various decision problems. These help to enumerate the witnesses by constructing appropriate search data structures. Hence, 3SUM-hardness of the decision problems is deduced. We utilize this framework to show conditional lower bounds for several variants of convolutions, matrix multiplication and string problems. Our framework uses a strong connection between all of these problems and the ability to find \emph{witnesses}. While these specific applications are used to demonstrate the techniques of our framework, we believe that this novel framework is useful for many other problems as well. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.