-
Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge
Authors:
Dominic LaBella,
Ujjwal Baid,
Omaditya Khanna,
Shan McBurney-Lin,
Ryan McLean,
Pierre Nedelec,
Arif Rashid,
Nourel Hoda Tahon,
Talissa Altes,
Radhika Bhalerao,
Yaseen Dhemesh,
Devon Godfrey,
Fathi Hilal,
Scott Floyd,
Anastasia Janas,
Anahita Fathi Kazerooni,
John Kirkpatrick,
Collin Kent,
Florian Kofler,
Kevin Leu,
Nazanin Maleki,
Bjoern Menze,
Maxence Pajot,
Zachary J. Reitman,
Jeffrey D. Rudie
, et al. (96 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning…
▽ More
We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
The ASNR-MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Intracranial Meningioma
Authors:
Dominic LaBella,
Maruf Adewole,
Michelle Alonso-Basanta,
Talissa Altes,
Syed Muhammad Anwar,
Ujjwal Baid,
Timothy Bergquist,
Radhika Bhalerao,
Sully Chen,
Verena Chung,
Gian-Marco Conte,
Farouk Dako,
James Eddy,
Ivan Ezhov,
Devon Godfrey,
Fathi Hilal,
Ariana Familiar,
Keyvan Farahani,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias,
Zhifan Jiang,
Elaine Johanson,
Anahita Fathi Kazerooni,
Collin Kent,
John Kirkpatrick,
Florian Kofler
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiation oncologists rely on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal treatment monitoring; yet automated, objective, and quantitative tools for non-invasive assessment of men…
▽ More
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiation oncologists rely on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal treatment monitoring; yet automated, objective, and quantitative tools for non-invasive assessment of meningiomas on mpMRI are lacking. The BraTS meningioma 2023 challenge will provide a community standard and benchmark for state-of-the-art automated intracranial meningioma segmentation models based on the largest expert annotated multilabel meningioma mpMRI dataset to date. Challenge competitors will develop automated segmentation models to predict three distinct meningioma sub-regions on MRI including enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor core, and surrounding nonenhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Models will be evaluated on separate validation and held-out test datasets using standardized metrics utilized across the BraTS 2023 series of challenges including the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. The models developed during the course of this challenge will aid in incorporation of automated meningioma MRI segmentation into clinical practice, which will ultimately improve care of patients with meningioma.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A Case Study in Text Mining: Interpreting Twitter Data From World Cup Tweets
Authors:
Daniel Godfrey,
Caley Johns,
Carl Meyer,
Shaina Race,
Carol Sadek
Abstract:
Cluster analysis is a field of data analysis that extracts underlying patterns in data. One application of cluster analysis is in text-mining, the analysis of large collections of text to find similarities between documents. We used a collection of about 30,000 tweets extracted from Twitter just before the World Cup started. A common problem with real world text data is the presence of linguistic…
▽ More
Cluster analysis is a field of data analysis that extracts underlying patterns in data. One application of cluster analysis is in text-mining, the analysis of large collections of text to find similarities between documents. We used a collection of about 30,000 tweets extracted from Twitter just before the World Cup started. A common problem with real world text data is the presence of linguistic noise. In our case it would be extraneous tweets that are unrelated to dominant themes. To combat this problem, we created an algorithm that combined the DBSCAN algorithm and a consensus matrix. This way we are left with the tweets that are related to those dominant themes. We then used cluster analysis to find those topics that the tweets describe. We clustered the tweets using k-means, a commonly used clustering algorithm, and Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) and compared the results. The two algorithms gave similar results, but NMF proved to be faster and provided more easily interpreted results. We explored our results using two visualization tools, Gephi and Wordle.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
