-
Improved bounds for the bracketing number of orthants or revisiting an algorithm of Thiémard to compute bounds for the star discrepancy
Authors:
Michael Gnewuch
Abstract:
We improve the best known upper bound for the bracketing number of $d$-dimensional axis-parallel boxes anchored in $0$ (or, put differently, of lower left orthants intersected with the $d$-dimensional unit cube $[0,1]^d$). More precisely, we provide a better upper bound for the cardinality of an algorithmic bracketing cover construction due to Eric Thiémard, which forms the core of his algorithm t…
▽ More
We improve the best known upper bound for the bracketing number of $d$-dimensional axis-parallel boxes anchored in $0$ (or, put differently, of lower left orthants intersected with the $d$-dimensional unit cube $[0,1]^d$). More precisely, we provide a better upper bound for the cardinality of an algorithmic bracketing cover construction due to Eric Thiémard, which forms the core of his algorithm to approximate the star discrepancy of arbitrary point sets from [E. Thiémard, An algorithm to compute bounds for the star discrepancy, J.~Complexity 17 (2001), 850 -- 880].
Moreover, the new upper bound for the bracketing number of anchored axis-parallel boxes yields an improved upper bound for the bracketing number of arbitrary axis-parallel boxes in $[0,1]^d$.
In our upper bounds all constants are fully explicit.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2024; v1 submitted 1 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
On Negative Dependence Properties of Latin Hypercube Samples and Scrambled Nets
Authors:
Benjamin Doerr,
Michael Gnewuch
Abstract:
We study the notion of $γ$-negative dependence of random variables. This notion is a relaxation of the notion of negative orthant dependence (which corresponds to $1$-negative dependence), but nevertheless it still ensures concentration of measure and allows to use large deviation bounds of Chernoff-Hoeffding- or Bernstein-type. We study random variables based on random points $P$. These random va…
▽ More
We study the notion of $γ$-negative dependence of random variables. This notion is a relaxation of the notion of negative orthant dependence (which corresponds to $1$-negative dependence), but nevertheless it still ensures concentration of measure and allows to use large deviation bounds of Chernoff-Hoeffding- or Bernstein-type. We study random variables based on random points $P$. These random variables appear naturally in the analysis of the discrepancy of $P$ or, equivalently, of a suitable worst-case integration error of the quasi-Monte Carlo cubature that uses the points in $P$ as integration nodes. We introduce the correlation number, which is the smallest possible value of $γ$ that ensures $γ$-negative dependence. We prove that the random variables of interest based on Latin hypercube sampling or on $(t,m,d)$-nets do, in general, not have a correlation number of $1$, i.e., they are not negative orthant dependent. But it is known that the random variables based on Latin hypercube sampling in dimension $d$ are actually $γ$-negatively dependent with $γ\le e^d$, and the resulting probabilistic discrepancy bounds do only mildly depend on the $γ$-value.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2021; v1 submitted 21 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Discrepancy Bounds for a Class of Negatively Dependent Random Points Including Latin Hypercube Samples
Authors:
Michael Gnewuch,
Nils Hebbinghaus
Abstract:
We introduce a class of $γ$-negatively dependent random samples. We prove that this class includes, apart from Monte Carlo samples, in particular Latin hypercube samples and Latin hypercube samples padded by Monte Carlo.
For a $γ$-negatively dependent $N$-point sample in dimension $d$ we provide probabilistic upper bounds for its star discrepancy with explicitly stated dependence on $N$, $d$, an…
▽ More
We introduce a class of $γ$-negatively dependent random samples. We prove that this class includes, apart from Monte Carlo samples, in particular Latin hypercube samples and Latin hypercube samples padded by Monte Carlo.
For a $γ$-negatively dependent $N$-point sample in dimension $d$ we provide probabilistic upper bounds for its star discrepancy with explicitly stated dependence on $N$, $d$, and $γ$. These bounds generalize the probabilistic bounds for Monte Carlo samples from [Heinrich et al., Acta Arith. 96 (2001), 279--302] and [C.~Aistleitner, J.~Complexity 27 (2011), 531--540], and they are optimal for Monte Carlo and Latin hypercube samples. In the special case of Monte Carlo samples the constants that appear in our bounds improve substantially on the constants presented in the latter paper and in [C.~Aistleitner, M.~T.~Hofer, Math. Comp.~83 (2014), 1373--1381].
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Lower Error Bounds for Randomized Multilevel and Changing Dimension Algorithms
Authors:
Michael Gnewuch
Abstract:
We provide lower error bounds for randomized algorithms that approximate integrals of functions depending on an unrestricted or even infinite number of variables. More precisely, we consider the infinite-dimensional integration problem on weighted Hilbert spaces with an underlying anchored decomposition and arbitrary weights. We focus on randomized algorithms and the randomized worst case error. W…
▽ More
We provide lower error bounds for randomized algorithms that approximate integrals of functions depending on an unrestricted or even infinite number of variables. More precisely, we consider the infinite-dimensional integration problem on weighted Hilbert spaces with an underlying anchored decomposition and arbitrary weights. We focus on randomized algorithms and the randomized worst case error. We study two cost models for function evaluation which depend on the number of active variables of the chosen sample points. Multilevel algorithms behave very well with respect to the first cost model, while changing dimension algorithms and also dimension-wise quadrature methods, which are based on a similar idea, can take advantage of the more generous second cost model. We prove the first non-trivial lower error bounds for randomized algorithms in these cost models and demonstrate their quality in the case of product weights. In particular, we show that the randomized changing dimension algorithms provided in [L. Plaskota, G. W. Wasilkowski, J. Complexity 27 (2011), 505--518] achieve convergence rates arbitrarily close to the optimal convergence rate.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
A Randomized Algorithm Based on Threshold Accepting to Approximate the Star Discrepancy
Authors:
Michael Gnewuch,
Magnus Wahlström,
Carola Winzen
Abstract:
We present a new algorithm for estimating the star discrepancy of arbitrary point sets. Similar to the algorithm for discrepancy approximation of Winker and Fang [SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997), 2028--2042] it is based on the optimization algorithm threshold accepting. Our improvements include, amongst others, a non-uniform sampling strategy which is more suited for higher-dimensional inputs, and…
▽ More
We present a new algorithm for estimating the star discrepancy of arbitrary point sets. Similar to the algorithm for discrepancy approximation of Winker and Fang [SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997), 2028--2042] it is based on the optimization algorithm threshold accepting. Our improvements include, amongst others, a non-uniform sampling strategy which is more suited for higher-dimensional inputs, and rounding steps which transform axis-parallel boxes, on which the discrepancy is to be tested, into \emph{critical test boxes}. These critical test boxes provably yield higher discrepancy values, and contain the box that exhibits the maximum value of the local discrepancy. We provide comprehensive experiments to test the new algorithm. Our randomized algorithm computes the exact discrepancy frequently in all cases where this can be checked (i.e., where the exact discrepancy of the point set can be computed in feasible time). Most importantly, in higher dimension the new method behaves clearly better than all previously known methods.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2011; v1 submitted 10 March, 2011;
originally announced March 2011.
