Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Gledel, V

Partition strategies for the Maker-Breaker domination game

Authors: Guillaume Bagan, Eric Duchêne, Valentin Gledel, Tuomo Lehtilä, Aline Parreau

Abstract: The Maker-Breaker domination game is a positional game played on a graph by two players called Dominator and Staller. The players alternately select a vertex of the graph that has not yet been chosen. Dominator wins if at some point the vertices she has chosen form a dominating set of the graph. Staller wins if Dominator cannot form a dominating set. Deciding if Dominator has a winning strategy ha… ▽ More The Maker-Breaker domination game is a positional game played on a graph by two players called Dominator and Staller. The players alternately select a vertex of the graph that has not yet been chosen. Dominator wins if at some point the vertices she has chosen form a dominating set of the graph. Staller wins if Dominator cannot form a dominating set. Deciding if Dominator has a winning strategy has been shown to be a PSPACE-complete problem even when restricted to chordal or bipartite graphs. In this paper, we consider strategies for Dominator based on partitions of the graph into basic subgraphs where Dominator wins as the second player. Using partitions into cycles and edges (also called perfect [1,2]-factors), we show that Dominator always wins in regular graphs and that deciding whether Dominator has a winning strategy as a second player can be computed in polynomial time for outerplanar and block graphs. We then study partitions into subgraphs with two universal vertices, which is equivalent to considering the existence of pairing dominating sets with adjacent pairs. We show that in interval graphs, Dominator wins if and only if such a partition exists. In particular, this implies that deciding whether Dominator has a winning strategy playing second is in NP for interval graphs. We finally provide an algorithm in $n^{k+3}$ for $k$-nested interval graphs (i.e. interval graphs with at most $k$ intervals included one in each other). △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

MSC Class: 05C57 ACM Class: G.2.2

Poset Positional Games

Authors: Guillaume Bagan, Eric Duchêne, Florian Galliot, Valentin Gledel, Mirjana Mikalački, Nacim Oijid, Aline Parreau, Miloš Stojaković

Abstract: We propose a generalization of positional games, supplementing them with a restriction on the order in which the elements of the board are allowed to be claimed. We introduce poset positional games, which are positional games with an additional structure -- a poset on the elements of the board. Throughout the game play, based on this poset and the set of the board elements that are claimed up to t… ▽ More We propose a generalization of positional games, supplementing them with a restriction on the order in which the elements of the board are allowed to be claimed. We introduce poset positional games, which are positional games with an additional structure -- a poset on the elements of the board. Throughout the game play, based on this poset and the set of the board elements that are claimed up to that point, we reduce the set of available moves for the player whose turn it is -- an element of the board can only be claimed if all the smaller elements in the poset are already claimed. We proceed to analyse these games in more detail, with a prime focus on the most studied convention, the Maker-Breaker games. First we build a general framework around poset positional games. Then, we perform a comprehensive study of the complexity of determining the game outcome, conditioned on the structure of the family of winning sets on the one side and the structure of the poset on the other. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2024; v1 submitted 11 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

A note on the flip distance between non-crossing spanning trees

Authors: Nicolas Bousquet, Valentin Gledel, Jonathan Narboni, Théo Pierron

Abstract: We consider spanning trees of $n$ points in convex position whose edges are pairwise non-crossing. Applying a flip to such a tree consists in adding an edge and removing another so that the result is still a non-crossing spanning tree. Given two trees, we investigate the minimum number of flips required to transform one into the other. The naive $2n-Ω(1)$ upper bound stood for 25 years until a rec… ▽ More We consider spanning trees of $n$ points in convex position whose edges are pairwise non-crossing. Applying a flip to such a tree consists in adding an edge and removing another so that the result is still a non-crossing spanning tree. Given two trees, we investigate the minimum number of flips required to transform one into the other. The naive $2n-Ω(1)$ upper bound stood for 25 years until a recent breakthrough from Aichholzer et al. yielding a $2n-Ω(\log n)$ bound. We improve their result with a $2n-Ω(\sqrt{n})$ upper bound, and we strengthen and shorten the proofs of several of their results. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Complexity of Maker-Breaker Games on Edge Sets of Graphs

Authors: Eric Duchêne, Valentin Gledel, Fionn Mc Inerney, Nicolas Nisse, Nacim Oijid, Aline Parreau, Miloš Stojaković

Abstract: We initiate the study of the algorithmic complexity of Maker-Breaker games played on the edge sets of general graphs. We mainly consider the perfect matching game and the $H$-game. Maker wins if she claims the edges of a perfect matching in the first, and a copy of a fixed graph $H$ in the second. We prove that deciding who wins the perfect matching game and the $H$-game is PSPACE-complete, even f… ▽ More We initiate the study of the algorithmic complexity of Maker-Breaker games played on the edge sets of general graphs. We mainly consider the perfect matching game and the $H$-game. Maker wins if she claims the edges of a perfect matching in the first, and a copy of a fixed graph $H$ in the second. We prove that deciding who wins the perfect matching game and the $H$-game is PSPACE-complete, even for the latter in small-diameter graphs if $H$ is a tree. Toward finding the smallest graph $H$ for which the $H$-game is PSPACE-complete, we also prove that such an $H$ of order 51 and size 57 exists. We then give several positive results for the $H$-game. As the $H$-game is already PSPACE-complete when $H$ is a tree, we mainly consider the case where $H$ belongs to a subclass of trees. In particular, we design two linear-time algorithms, both based on structural characterizations, to decide the winners of the $P_4$-game in general graphs and the $K_{1,\ell}$-game in trees. Then, we prove that the $K_{1,\ell}$-game in any graph, and the $H$-game in trees are both FPT parameterized by the length of the game, notably adding to the short list of games with this property, which is of independent interest. Another natural direction to take is to consider the $H$-game when $H$ is a cycle. While we were unable to resolve this case, we prove that the related arboricity-$k$ game is polynomial-time solvable. In particular, when $k=2$, Maker wins this game if she claims the edges of any cycle. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; v1 submitted 21 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

MSC Class: 91A24; 91A43; 91A46

Maker-Breaker domination game

Authors: Eric Duchêne, Valentin Gledel, Aline Parreau, Gabriel Renault

Abstract: We introduce the Maker-Breaker domination game, a two player game on a graph. At his turn, the first player, Dominator, select a vertex in order to dominate the graph while the other player, Staller, forbids a vertex to Dominator in order to prevent him to reach his goal. Both players play alternately without missing their turn. This game is a particular instance of the so-called Maker-Breaker gam… ▽ More We introduce the Maker-Breaker domination game, a two player game on a graph. At his turn, the first player, Dominator, select a vertex in order to dominate the graph while the other player, Staller, forbids a vertex to Dominator in order to prevent him to reach his goal. Both players play alternately without missing their turn. This game is a particular instance of the so-called Maker-Breaker games, that is studied here in a combinatorial context. In this paper, we first prove that deciding the winner of the Maker-Breaker domination game is PSPACE-complete, even for bipartite graphs and split graphs. It is then showed that the problem is polynomial for cographs and trees. In particular, we define a strategy for Dominator that is derived from a variation of the dominating set problem, called the pairing dominating set problem. △ Less

Submitted 18 September, 2018; v1 submitted 25 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

MSC Class: 05C57; 05C69; 91A43

A generalization of Arc-Kayles

Authors: Antoine Dailly, Valentin Gledel, Marc Heinrich

Abstract: The game Arc-Kayles is played on an undirected graph with two players taking turns deleting an edge and its endpoints from the graph. We study a generalization of this game, Weighted Arc Kayles (WAK for short), played on graphs with counters on the vertices. The two players alternate choosing an edge and removing one counter on both endpoints. An edge can no longer be selected if any of its endpoi… ▽ More The game Arc-Kayles is played on an undirected graph with two players taking turns deleting an edge and its endpoints from the graph. We study a generalization of this game, Weighted Arc Kayles (WAK for short), played on graphs with counters on the vertices. The two players alternate choosing an edge and removing one counter on both endpoints. An edge can no longer be selected if any of its endpoints has no counter left. The last player to play a move wins. We give a winning strategy for WAK on trees of depth 2. Moreover, we show that the Grundy values of WAK and Arc-Kayles are unbounded. We also prove a periodicity result on the outcome of WAK when the number of counters is fixed for all the vertices but one. Finally, we show links between this game and a variation of the non-attacking queens game on a chessboard. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2018; v1 submitted 15 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Identification of points using disks

Authors: Valentin Gledel, Aline Parreau

Abstract: We consider the problem of identifying n points in the plane using disks, i.e., minimizing the number of disks so that each point is contained in a disk and no two points are in exactly the same set of disks. This problem can be seen as an instance of the test covering problem with geometric constraints on the tests. We give tight lower and upper bounds on the number of disks needed to identify an… ▽ More We consider the problem of identifying n points in the plane using disks, i.e., minimizing the number of disks so that each point is contained in a disk and no two points are in exactly the same set of disks. This problem can be seen as an instance of the test covering problem with geometric constraints on the tests. We give tight lower and upper bounds on the number of disks needed to identify any set of n points of the plane. In particular, we prove that if there are no three colinear points nor four cocyclic points, then roughly n/3 disks are enough, improving the known bound of (n+1)/2 when we only require that no three points are colinear. We also consider complexity issues when the radius of the disks is fixed, proving that this problem is NP-complete. In contrast, we give a linear-time algorithm computing the exact number of disks if the points are colinear. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.