How to design a dataset compliant with an ML-based system ODD?
Authors:
Cyril Cappi,
Noémie Cohen,
Mélanie Ducoffe,
Christophe Gabreau,
Laurent Gardes,
Adrien Gauffriau,
Jean-Brice Ginestet,
Franck Mamalet,
Vincent Mussot,
Claire Pagetti,
David Vigouroux
Abstract:
This paper focuses on a Vision-based Landing task and presents the design and the validation of a dataset that would comply with the Operational Design Domain (ODD) of a Machine-Learning (ML) system. Relying on emerging certification standards, we describe the process for establishing ODDs at both the system and image levels. In the process, we present the translation of high-level system constrai…
▽ More
This paper focuses on a Vision-based Landing task and presents the design and the validation of a dataset that would comply with the Operational Design Domain (ODD) of a Machine-Learning (ML) system. Relying on emerging certification standards, we describe the process for establishing ODDs at both the system and image levels. In the process, we present the translation of high-level system constraints into actionable image-level properties, allowing for the definition of verifiable Data Quality Requirements (DQRs). To illustrate this approach, we use the Landing Approach Runway Detection (LARD) dataset which combines synthetic imagery and real footage, and we focus on the steps required to verify the DQRs. The replicable framework presented in this paper addresses the challenges of designing a dataset compliant with the stringent needs of ML-based systems certification in safety-critical applications.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
White Paper Machine Learning in Certified Systems
Authors:
Hervé Delseny,
Christophe Gabreau,
Adrien Gauffriau,
Bernard Beaudouin,
Ludovic Ponsolle,
Lucian Alecu,
Hugues Bonnin,
Brice Beltran,
Didier Duchel,
Jean-Brice Ginestet,
Alexandre Hervieu,
Ghilaine Martinez,
Sylvain Pasquet,
Kevin Delmas,
Claire Pagetti,
Jean-Marc Gabriel,
Camille Chapdelaine,
Sylvaine Picard,
Mathieu Damour,
Cyril Cappi,
Laurent Gardès,
Florence De Grancey,
Eric Jenn,
Baptiste Lefevre,
Gregory Flandin
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine Learning (ML) seems to be one of the most promising solution to automate partially or completely some of the complex tasks currently realized by humans, such as driving vehicles, recognizing voice, etc. It is also an opportunity to implement and embed new capabilities out of the reach of classical implementation techniques. However, ML techniques introduce new potential risks. Therefore, t…
▽ More
Machine Learning (ML) seems to be one of the most promising solution to automate partially or completely some of the complex tasks currently realized by humans, such as driving vehicles, recognizing voice, etc. It is also an opportunity to implement and embed new capabilities out of the reach of classical implementation techniques. However, ML techniques introduce new potential risks. Therefore, they have only been applied in systems where their benefits are considered worth the increase of risk. In practice, ML techniques raise multiple challenges that could prevent their use in systems submitted to certification constraints. But what are the actual challenges? Can they be overcome by selecting appropriate ML techniques, or by adopting new engineering or certification practices? These are some of the questions addressed by the ML Certification 3 Workgroup (WG) set-up by the Institut de Recherche Technologique Saint Exupéry de Toulouse (IRT), as part of the DEEL Project.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
