-
Comparing Methods for Creating a National Random Sample of Twitter Users
Authors:
Meysam Alizadeh,
Darya Zare,
Zeynab Samei,
Mohammadamin Alizadeh,
Mael Kubli,
Mohammadhadi Aliahmadi,
Sarvenaz Ebrahimi,
Fabrizio Gilardi
Abstract:
Twitter data has been widely used by researchers across various social and computer science disciplines. A common aim when working with Twitter data is the construction of a random sample of users from a given country. However, while several methods have been proposed in the literature, their comparative performance is mostly unexplored. In this paper, we implement four common methods to collect a…
▽ More
Twitter data has been widely used by researchers across various social and computer science disciplines. A common aim when working with Twitter data is the construction of a random sample of users from a given country. However, while several methods have been proposed in the literature, their comparative performance is mostly unexplored. In this paper, we implement four common methods to collect a random sample of Twitter users in the US: 1% Stream, Bounding Box, Location Query, and Language Query. Then, we compare the methods according to their tweet- and user-level metrics as well as their accuracy in estimating US population with and without using inclusion probabilities of various demographics. Our results show that the 1% Stream method performs differently than others in tweet- and user-level metrics, and best for the construction of a population representative sample. We discuss the conditions under which the 1% Stream method may not be suitable and suggest the Bounding Box method as the second-best method to use.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2024; v1 submitted 7 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Open-Source LLMs for Text Annotation: A Practical Guide for Model Setting and Fine-Tuning
Authors:
Meysam Alizadeh,
Maël Kubli,
Zeynab Samei,
Shirin Dehghani,
Mohammadmasiha Zahedivafa,
Juan Diego Bermeo,
Maria Korobeynikova,
Fabrizio Gilardi
Abstract:
This paper studies the performance of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) in text classification tasks typical for political science research. By examining tasks like stance, topic, and relevance classification, we aim to guide scholars in making informed decisions about their use of LLMs for text analysis. Specifically, we conduct an assessment of both zero-shot and fine-tuned LLMs across a…
▽ More
This paper studies the performance of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) in text classification tasks typical for political science research. By examining tasks like stance, topic, and relevance classification, we aim to guide scholars in making informed decisions about their use of LLMs for text analysis. Specifically, we conduct an assessment of both zero-shot and fine-tuned LLMs across a range of text annotation tasks using news articles and tweets datasets. Our analysis shows that fine-tuning improves the performance of open-source LLMs, allowing them to match or even surpass zero-shot GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, though still lagging behind fine-tuned GPT-3.5. We further establish that fine-tuning is preferable to few-shot training with a relatively modest quantity of annotated text. Our findings show that fine-tuned open-source LLMs can be effectively deployed in a broad spectrum of text annotation applications. We provide a Python notebook facilitating the application of LLMs in text annotation for other researchers.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 5 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks
Authors:
Fabrizio Gilardi,
Meysam Alizadeh,
Maël Kubli
Abstract:
Many NLP applications require manual data annotations for a variety of tasks, notably to train classifiers or evaluate the performance of unsupervised models. Depending on the size and degree of complexity, the tasks may be conducted by crowd-workers on platforms such as MTurk as well as trained annotators, such as research assistants. Using a sample of 2,382 tweets, we demonstrate that ChatGPT ou…
▽ More
Many NLP applications require manual data annotations for a variety of tasks, notably to train classifiers or evaluate the performance of unsupervised models. Depending on the size and degree of complexity, the tasks may be conducted by crowd-workers on platforms such as MTurk as well as trained annotators, such as research assistants. Using a sample of 2,382 tweets, we demonstrate that ChatGPT outperforms crowd-workers for several annotation tasks, including relevance, stance, topics, and frames detection. Specifically, the zero-shot accuracy of ChatGPT exceeds that of crowd-workers for four out of five tasks, while ChatGPT's intercoder agreement exceeds that of both crowd-workers and trained annotators for all tasks. Moreover, the per-annotation cost of ChatGPT is less than $0.003 -- about twenty times cheaper than MTurk. These results show the potential of large language models to drastically increase the efficiency of text classification.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2023; v1 submitted 27 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Human-in-the-Loop Hate Speech Classification in a Multilingual Context
Authors:
Ana Kotarcic,
Dominik Hangartner,
Fabrizio Gilardi,
Selina Kurer,
Karsten Donnay
Abstract:
The shift of public debate to the digital sphere has been accompanied by a rise in online hate speech. While many promising approaches for hate speech classification have been proposed, studies often focus only on a single language, usually English, and do not address three key concerns: post-deployment performance, classifier maintenance and infrastructural limitations. In this paper, we introduc…
▽ More
The shift of public debate to the digital sphere has been accompanied by a rise in online hate speech. While many promising approaches for hate speech classification have been proposed, studies often focus only on a single language, usually English, and do not address three key concerns: post-deployment performance, classifier maintenance and infrastructural limitations. In this paper, we introduce a new human-in-the-loop BERT-based hate speech classification pipeline and trace its development from initial data collection and annotation all the way to post-deployment. Our classifier, trained using data from our original corpus of over 422k examples, is specifically developed for the inherently multilingual setting of Switzerland and outperforms with its F1 score of 80.5 the currently best-performing BERT-based multilingual classifier by 5.8 F1 points in German and 3.6 F1 points in French. Our systematic evaluations over a 12-month period further highlight the vital importance of continuous, human-in-the-loop classifier maintenance to ensure robust hate speech classification post-deployment.
△ Less
Submitted 1 January, 2023; v1 submitted 5 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
