fNIRS Analysis of Interaction Techniques in Touchscreen-Based Educational Gaming
Authors:
Shayla Sharmin,
Elham Bakhshipour,
Behdokht Kiafar,
Md Fahim Abrar,
Pinar Kullu,
Nancy Getchell,
Roghayeh Leila Barmaki
Abstract:
Touchscreens are becoming increasingly widespread in educational games, enhancing the quality of learner experience. Traditional metrics are often used to evaluate various input modalities, including hand and stylus. However, there exists a gap in understanding the cognitive impacts of these modalities during educational gameplay, which can be addressed through brain signal analysis to gain deeper…
▽ More
Touchscreens are becoming increasingly widespread in educational games, enhancing the quality of learner experience. Traditional metrics are often used to evaluate various input modalities, including hand and stylus. However, there exists a gap in understanding the cognitive impacts of these modalities during educational gameplay, which can be addressed through brain signal analysis to gain deeper insights into the underlying cognitive function and necessary brain resources for each condition. This facilitates a more precise comparison between conditions. In this study, we compared the brain signal and user experience of using hands and stylus on touchscreens while playing an educational game by analyzing hemodynamic response and self-reported measures. Participants engaged in a Unity-based educational quiz game using both hand and stylus on a touchscreen in a counterbalanced within-subject design. Oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin data were collected using fNIRS, alongside quiz performance scores and standardized and customized user experience questionnaire ratings. Our findings show almost the same performance level with both input modalities, however, the hand requires less oxygen flow which suggests a lower cognitive effort than using a stylus while playing the educational game. Although the result shows that the stylus condition required more neural involvement than the hand condition, there is no significant difference between the use of both input modalities. However, there is a statistically significant difference in self-reported measures that support the findings mentioned above, favoring the hand that enhances understanding of modality effects in interactive educational environments.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Cognitive Engagement for STEM+C Education: Investigating Serious Game Impact on Graph Structure Learning with fNIRS
Authors:
Shayla Sharmin,
Reza Koiler,
Rifat Sadik,
Arpan Bhattacharjee,
Priyanka Raju Patre,
Pinar Kullu,
Charles Hohensee,
Nancy Getchell,
Roghayeh Leila Barmaki
Abstract:
For serious games on education, understanding the effectiveness of different learning methods in influencing cognitive processes remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the impact of serious games on graph structure learning. For this, we compared our in-house game-based learning (GBL) and video-based learning (VBL) methodologies by evaluating their effectiveness on cognitive proc…
▽ More
For serious games on education, understanding the effectiveness of different learning methods in influencing cognitive processes remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the impact of serious games on graph structure learning. For this, we compared our in-house game-based learning (GBL) and video-based learning (VBL) methodologies by evaluating their effectiveness on cognitive processes by oxygenated hemoglobin levels using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). We conducted a 2 x 1 between subjects preliminary study with twelve participants, involving two conditions: game and video. Both groups received equivalent content related to the basic structure of a graph, with comparable session lengths. The game group interacted with a quiz-based game, while the video group watched a pre-recorded video. The fNIRS was employed to capture cerebral signals from the prefrontal cortex, and participants completed pre- and post- questionnaires capturing user experience and knowledge gain. In our study, we noted that the mean levels of oxygenated hemoglobin were higher in the GBL group, suggesting the potential enhanced cognitive involvement. Our results show that the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) has greater hemodynamic activity during the learning period. Moreover, knowledge gain analysis showed an increase in mean score in the GBL group compared to the VBL group. Although we did not observe statistically significant changes due to participant variability and sample size, this preliminary work contributes to understanding how GBL and VBL impact cognitive processes, providing insights for enhanced instructional design and educational game development. Additionally, it emphasizes the necessity for further investigation into the impact of GBL on cognitive engagement and learning outcomes.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 25 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
