Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Geleßus, D
-
Formalization of Advanced VOs semantics and VO Refinement
Authors:
Sebastian Stock,
Fabian Vu,
David Geleßus,
Atif Mashkoor,
Michael Leuschel,
Alexander Egyed
Abstract:
This document lays out the foundations for VO and requirement refinement, abstractions of models, and instantiations. Also, VOs on abstractions and instantiations are considered.
This document lays out the foundations for VO and requirement refinement, abstractions of models, and instantiations. Also, VOs on abstractions and instantiations are considered.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Making ProB compatible with SWI-Prolog
Authors:
David Geleßus,
Michael Leuschel
Abstract:
Even though the core of the Prolog programming language has been standardized by ISO since 1995, it remains difficult to write complex Prolog programs that can run unmodified on multiple Prolog implementations. Indeed, implementations sometimes deviate from the ISO standard and the standard itself fails to cover many features that are essential in practice.
Most Prolog applications thus have to…
▽ More
Even though the core of the Prolog programming language has been standardized by ISO since 1995, it remains difficult to write complex Prolog programs that can run unmodified on multiple Prolog implementations. Indeed, implementations sometimes deviate from the ISO standard and the standard itself fails to cover many features that are essential in practice.
Most Prolog applications thus have to rely on non-standard features, often making them dependent on one particular Prolog implementation and incompatible with others. We examine one such Prolog application: ProB, which has been developed for over 20 years in SICStus Prolog.
The article describes how we managed to refactor the codebase of ProB to also support SWI-Prolog, with the goal of verifying ProB's results using two independent toolchains. This required a multitude of adjustments, ranging from extending the SICStus emulation in SWI-Prolog on to better modularizing the monolithic ProB codebase. We also describe notable compatibility issues and other differences that we encountered in the process, and how we were able to deal with them with few major code changes.
Under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
