-
Community Driven Approaches to Research in Technology & Society CCC Workshop Report
Authors:
Suresh Venkatasubramanian,
Timnit Gebru,
Ufuk Topcu,
Haley Griffin,
Leah Namisa Rosenbloom,
Nasim Sonboli
Abstract:
Based on our workshop activities, we outlined three ways in which research can support community needs: (1) Map** the ecosystem of both the players and ecosystem and harm landscapes, (2) Counter-Programming, which entails using the same surveillance tools that communities are subjected to observe the entities doing the surveilling, effectively protecting people from surveillance, and conducting…
▽ More
Based on our workshop activities, we outlined three ways in which research can support community needs: (1) Map** the ecosystem of both the players and ecosystem and harm landscapes, (2) Counter-Programming, which entails using the same surveillance tools that communities are subjected to observe the entities doing the surveilling, effectively protecting people from surveillance, and conducting ethical data collection to measure the impact of these technologies, and (3) Engaging in positive visions and tools for empowerment so that technology can bring good instead of harm.
In order to effectively collaborate on the aforementioned directions, we outlined seven important mechanisms for effective collaboration: (1) Never expect free labor of community members, (2) Ensure goals are aligned between all collaborators, (3) Elevate community members to leadership positions, (4) Understand no group is a monolith, (5) Establish a common language, (6) Discuss organization roles and goals of the project transparently from the start, and (7) Enable a recourse for harm.
We recommend that anyone engaging in community-based research (1) starts with community-defined solutions, (2) provides alternatives to digital services/information collecting mechanisms, (3) prohibits harmful automated systems, (4) transparently states any systems impact, (5) minimizes and protects data, (6) proactively demonstrates a system is safe and beneficial prior to deployment, and (7) provides resources directly to community partners.
Throughout the recommendation section of the report, we also provide specific recommendations for funding agencies, academic institutions, and individual researchers.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Responsible AI
Authors:
Vinodkumar Prabhakaran,
Margaret Mitchell,
Timnit Gebru,
Iason Gabriel
Abstract:
Research on fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics of AI-based interventions in society has gained much-needed momentum in recent years. However it lacks an explicit alignment with a set of normative values and principles that guide this research and interventions. Rather, an implicit consensus is often assumed to hold for the values we impart into our models - something that is at odds…
▽ More
Research on fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics of AI-based interventions in society has gained much-needed momentum in recent years. However it lacks an explicit alignment with a set of normative values and principles that guide this research and interventions. Rather, an implicit consensus is often assumed to hold for the values we impart into our models - something that is at odds with the pluralistic world we live in. In this paper, we put forth the doctrine of universal human rights as a set of globally salient and cross-culturally recognized set of values that can serve as a grounding framework for explicit value alignment in responsible AI - and discuss its efficacy as a framework for civil society partnership and participation. We argue that a human rights framework orients the research in this space away from the machines and the risks of their biases, and towards humans and the risks to their rights, essentially hel** to center the conversation around who is harmed, what harms they face, and how those harms may be mitigated.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Diversity and Inclusion Metrics in Subset Selection
Authors:
Margaret Mitchell,
Dylan Baker,
Nyalleng Moorosi,
Emily Denton,
Ben Hutchinson,
Alex Hanna,
Timnit Gebru,
Jamie Morgenstern
Abstract:
The ethical concept of fairness has recently been applied in machine learning (ML) settings to describe a wide range of constraints and objectives. When considering the relevance of ethical concepts to subset selection problems, the concepts of diversity and inclusion are additionally applicable in order to create outputs that account for social power and access differentials. We introduce metrics…
▽ More
The ethical concept of fairness has recently been applied in machine learning (ML) settings to describe a wide range of constraints and objectives. When considering the relevance of ethical concepts to subset selection problems, the concepts of diversity and inclusion are additionally applicable in order to create outputs that account for social power and access differentials. We introduce metrics based on these concepts, which can be applied together, separately, and in tandem with additional fairness constraints. Results from human subject experiments lend support to the proposed criteria. Social choice methods can additionally be leveraged to aggregate and choose preferable sets, and we detail how these may be applied.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing
Authors:
Inioluwa Deborah Raji,
Andrew Smart,
Rebecca N. White,
Margaret Mitchell,
Timnit Gebru,
Ben Hutchinson,
Jamila Smith-Loud,
Daniel Theron,
Parker Barnes
Abstract:
Rising concern for the societal implications of artificial intelligence systems has inspired a wave of academic and journalistic literature in which deployed systems are audited for harm by investigators from outside the organizations deploying the algorithms. However, it remains challenging for practitioners to identify the harmful repercussions of their own systems prior to deployment, and, once…
▽ More
Rising concern for the societal implications of artificial intelligence systems has inspired a wave of academic and journalistic literature in which deployed systems are audited for harm by investigators from outside the organizations deploying the algorithms. However, it remains challenging for practitioners to identify the harmful repercussions of their own systems prior to deployment, and, once deployed, emergent issues can become difficult or impossible to trace back to their source. In this paper, we introduce a framework for algorithmic auditing that supports artificial intelligence system development end-to-end, to be applied throughout the internal organization development lifecycle. Each stage of the audit yields a set of documents that together form an overall audit report, drawing on an organization's values or principles to assess the fit of decisions made throughout the process. The proposed auditing framework is intended to contribute to closing the accountability gap in the development and deployment of large-scale artificial intelligence systems by embedding a robust process to ensure audit integrity.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditing
Authors:
Inioluwa Deborah Raji,
Timnit Gebru,
Margaret Mitchell,
Joy Buolamwini,
Joonseok Lee,
Emily Denton
Abstract:
Although essential to revealing biased performance, well intentioned attempts at algorithmic auditing can have effects that may harm the very populations these measures are meant to protect. This concern is even more salient while auditing biometric systems such as facial recognition, where the data is sensitive and the technology is often used in ethically questionable manners. We demonstrate a s…
▽ More
Although essential to revealing biased performance, well intentioned attempts at algorithmic auditing can have effects that may harm the very populations these measures are meant to protect. This concern is even more salient while auditing biometric systems such as facial recognition, where the data is sensitive and the technology is often used in ethically questionable manners. We demonstrate a set of five ethical concerns in the particular case of auditing commercial facial processing technology, highlighting additional design considerations and ethical tensions the auditor needs to be aware of so as not exacerbate or complement the harms propagated by the audited system. We go further to provide tangible illustrations of these concerns, and conclude by reflecting on what these concerns mean for the role of the algorithmic audit and the fundamental product limitations they reveal.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learning
Authors:
Eun Seo Jo,
Timnit Gebru
Abstract:
A growing body of work shows that many problems in fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in machine learning systems are rooted in decisions surrounding the data collection and annotation process. In spite of its fundamental nature however, data collection remains an overlooked part of the machine learning (ML) pipeline. In this paper, we argue that a new specialization should be form…
▽ More
A growing body of work shows that many problems in fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in machine learning systems are rooted in decisions surrounding the data collection and annotation process. In spite of its fundamental nature however, data collection remains an overlooked part of the machine learning (ML) pipeline. In this paper, we argue that a new specialization should be formed within ML that is focused on methodologies for data collection and annotation: efforts that require institutional frameworks and procedures. Specifically for sociocultural data, parallels can be drawn from archives and libraries. Archives are the longest standing communal effort to gather human information and archive scholars have already developed the language and procedures to address and discuss many challenges pertaining to data collection such as consent, power, inclusivity, transparency, and ethics & privacy. We discuss these five key approaches in document collection practices in archives that can inform data collection in sociocultural ML. By showing data collection practices from another field, we encourage ML research to be more cognizant and systematic in data collection and draw from interdisciplinary expertise.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Oxford Handbook on AI Ethics Book Chapter on Race and Gender
Authors:
Timnit Gebru
Abstract:
From massive face-recognition-based surveillance and machine-learning-based decision systems predicting crime recidivism rates, to the move towards automated health diagnostic systems, artificial intelligence (AI) is being used in scenarios that have serious consequences in people's lives. However, this rapid permeation of AI into society has not been accompanied by a thorough investigation of the…
▽ More
From massive face-recognition-based surveillance and machine-learning-based decision systems predicting crime recidivism rates, to the move towards automated health diagnostic systems, artificial intelligence (AI) is being used in scenarios that have serious consequences in people's lives. However, this rapid permeation of AI into society has not been accompanied by a thorough investigation of the sociopolitical issues that cause certain groups of people to be harmed rather than advantaged by it. For instance, recent studies have shown that commercial face recognition systems have much higher error rates for dark skinned women while having minimal errors on light skinned men. A 2016 ProPublica investigation uncovered that machine learning based tools that assess crime recidivism rates in the US are biased against African Americans. Other studies show that natural language processing tools trained on newspapers exhibit societal biases (e.g. finishing the analogy "Man is to computer programmer as woman is to X" by homemaker). At the same time, books such as Weapons of Math Destruction and Automated Inequality detail how people in lower socioeconomic classes in the US are subjected to more automated decision making tools than those who are in the upper class. Thus, these tools are most often used on people towards whom they exhibit the most bias. While many technical solutions have been proposed to alleviate bias in machine learning systems, we have to take a holistic and multifaceted approach. This includes standardization bodies determining what types of systems can be used in which scenarios, making sure that automated decision tools are created by people from diverse backgrounds, and understanding the historical and political factors that disadvantage certain groups who are subjected to these tools.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
iCassava 2019 Fine-Grained Visual Categorization Challenge
Authors:
Ernest Mwebaze,
Timnit Gebru,
Andrea Frome,
Solomon Nsumba,
Jeremy Tusubira
Abstract:
Viral diseases are major sources of poor yields for cassava, the 2nd largest provider of carbohydrates in Africa.At least 80% of small-holder farmer households in Sub-Saharan Africa grow cassava. Since many of these farmers have smart phones, they can easily obtain photos of dis-eased and healthy cassava leaves in their farms, allowing the opportunity to use computer vision techniques to monitor t…
▽ More
Viral diseases are major sources of poor yields for cassava, the 2nd largest provider of carbohydrates in Africa.At least 80% of small-holder farmer households in Sub-Saharan Africa grow cassava. Since many of these farmers have smart phones, they can easily obtain photos of dis-eased and healthy cassava leaves in their farms, allowing the opportunity to use computer vision techniques to monitor the disease type and severity and increase yields. How-ever, annotating these images is extremely difficult as ex-perts who are able to distinguish between highly similar dis-eases need to be employed. We provide a dataset of labeled and unlabeled cassava leaves and formulate a Kaggle challenge to encourage participants to improve the performance of their algorithms using semi-supervised approaches. This paper describes our dataset and challenge which is part of the Fine-Grained Visual Categorization workshop at CVPR2019.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2019; v1 submitted 7 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Image Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis for Detecting Unintended Bias
Authors:
Remi Denton,
Ben Hutchinson,
Margaret Mitchell,
Timnit Gebru,
Andrew Zaldivar
Abstract:
Facial analysis models are increasingly used in applications that have serious impacts on people's lives, ranging from authentication to surveillance tracking. It is therefore critical to develop techniques that can reveal unintended biases in facial classifiers to help guide the ethical use of facial analysis technology. This work proposes a framework called \textit{image counterfactual sensiti…
▽ More
Facial analysis models are increasingly used in applications that have serious impacts on people's lives, ranging from authentication to surveillance tracking. It is therefore critical to develop techniques that can reveal unintended biases in facial classifiers to help guide the ethical use of facial analysis technology. This work proposes a framework called \textit{image counterfactual sensitivity analysis}, which we explore as a proof-of-concept in analyzing a smiling attribute classifier trained on faces of celebrities. The framework utilizes counterfactuals to examine how a classifier's prediction changes if a face characteristic slightly changes. We leverage recent advances in generative adversarial networks to build a realistic generative model of face images that affords controlled manipulation of specific image characteristics. We then introduce a set of metrics that measure the effect of manipulating a specific property on the output of the trained classifier. Empirically, we find several different factors of variation that affect the predictions of the smiling classifier. This proof-of-concept demonstrates potential ways generative models can be leveraged for fine-grained analysis of bias and fairness.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2020; v1 submitted 14 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Model Cards for Model Reporting
Authors:
Margaret Mitchell,
Simone Wu,
Andrew Zaldivar,
Parker Barnes,
Lucy Vasserman,
Ben Hutchinson,
Elena Spitzer,
Inioluwa Deborah Raji,
Timnit Gebru
Abstract:
Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. In order to clarify the intended use cases of machine learning models and minimize their usage in contexts for which they are not well suited, we recommend that released models be accompanied by documentation detailing their performance character…
▽ More
Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. In order to clarify the intended use cases of machine learning models and minimize their usage in contexts for which they are not well suited, we recommend that released models be accompanied by documentation detailing their performance characteristics. In this paper, we propose a framework that we call model cards, to encourage such transparent model reporting. Model cards are short documents accompanying trained machine learning models that provide benchmarked evaluation in a variety of conditions, such as across different cultural, demographic, or phenotypic groups (e.g., race, geographic location, sex, Fitzpatrick skin type) and intersectional groups (e.g., age and race, or sex and Fitzpatrick skin type) that are relevant to the intended application domains. Model cards also disclose the context in which models are intended to be used, details of the performance evaluation procedures, and other relevant information. While we focus primarily on human-centered machine learning models in the application fields of computer vision and natural language processing, this framework can be used to document any trained machine learning model. To solidify the concept, we provide cards for two supervised models: One trained to detect smiling faces in images, and one trained to detect toxic comments in text. We propose model cards as a step towards the responsible democratization of machine learning and related AI technology, increasing transparency into how well AI technology works. We hope this work encourages those releasing trained machine learning models to accompany model releases with similar detailed evaluation numbers and other relevant documentation.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2019; v1 submitted 5 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Datasheets for Datasets
Authors:
Timnit Gebru,
Jamie Morgenstern,
Briana Vecchione,
Jennifer Wortman Vaughan,
Hanna Wallach,
Hal Daumé III,
Kate Crawford
Abstract:
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended use…
▽ More
The machine learning community currently has no standardized process for documenting datasets, which can lead to severe consequences in high-stakes domains. To address this gap, we propose datasheets for datasets. In the electronics industry, every component, no matter how simple or complex, is accompanied with a datasheet that describes its operating characteristics, test results, recommended uses, and other information. By analogy, we propose that every dataset be accompanied with a datasheet that documents its motivation, composition, collection process, recommended uses, and so on. Datasheets for datasets will facilitate better communication between dataset creators and dataset consumers, and encourage the machine learning community to prioritize transparency and accountability.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2021; v1 submitted 23 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Scalable Annotation of Fine-Grained Categories Without Experts
Authors:
Timnit Gebru,
Jonathan Krause,
Jia Deng,
Li Fei-Fei
Abstract:
We present a crowdsourcing workflow to collect image annotations for visually similar synthetic categories without requiring experts. In animals, there is a direct link between taxonomy and visual similarity: e.g. a collie (type of dog) looks more similar to other collies (e.g. smooth collie) than a greyhound (another type of dog). However, in synthetic categories such as cars, objects with simila…
▽ More
We present a crowdsourcing workflow to collect image annotations for visually similar synthetic categories without requiring experts. In animals, there is a direct link between taxonomy and visual similarity: e.g. a collie (type of dog) looks more similar to other collies (e.g. smooth collie) than a greyhound (another type of dog). However, in synthetic categories such as cars, objects with similar taxonomy can have very different appearance: e.g. a 2011 Ford F-150 Supercrew-HD looks the same as a 2011 Ford F-150 Supercrew-LL but very different from a 2011 Ford F-150 Supercrew-SVT. We introduce a graph based crowdsourcing algorithm to automatically group visually indistinguishable objects together. Using our workflow, we label 712,430 images by ~1,000 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers; resulting in the largest fine-grained visual dataset reported to date with 2,657 categories of cars annotated at 1/20th the cost of hiring experts.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimation
Authors:
Timnit Gebru,
Jonathan Krause,
Yilun Wang,
Duyun Chen,
Jia Deng,
Li Fei-Fei
Abstract:
Targeted socioeconomic policies require an accurate understanding of a country's demographic makeup. To that end, the United States spends more than 1 billion dollars a year gathering census data such as race, gender, education, occupation and unemployment rates. Compared to the traditional method of collecting surveys across many years which is costly and labor intensive, data-driven, machine lea…
▽ More
Targeted socioeconomic policies require an accurate understanding of a country's demographic makeup. To that end, the United States spends more than 1 billion dollars a year gathering census data such as race, gender, education, occupation and unemployment rates. Compared to the traditional method of collecting surveys across many years which is costly and labor intensive, data-driven, machine learning driven approaches are cheaper and faster--with the potential ability to detect trends in close to real time. In this work, we leverage the ubiquity of Google Street View images and develop a computer vision pipeline to predict income, per capita carbon emission, crime rates and other city attributes from a single source of publicly available visual data. We first detect cars in 50 million images across 200 of the largest US cities and train a model to predict demographic attributes using the detected cars. To facilitate our work, we have collected the largest and most challenging fine-grained dataset reported to date consisting of over 2600 classes of cars comprised of images from Google Street View and other web sources, classified by car experts to account for even the most subtle of visual differences. We use this data to construct the largest scale fine-grained detection system reported to date. Our prediction results correlate well with ground truth income data (r=0.82), Massachusetts department of vehicle registration, and sources investigating crime rates, income segregation, per capita carbon emission, and other market research. Finally, we learn interesting relationships between cars and neighborhoods allowing us to perform the first large scale sociological analysis of cities using computer vision techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Fine-grained Recognition in the Wild: A Multi-Task Domain Adaptation Approach
Authors:
Timnit Gebru,
Judy Hoffman,
Li Fei-Fei
Abstract:
While fine-grained object recognition is an important problem in computer vision, current models are unlikely to accurately classify objects in the wild. These fully supervised models need additional annotated images to classify objects in every new scenario, a task that is infeasible. However, sources such as e-commerce websites and field guides provide annotated images for many classes. In this…
▽ More
While fine-grained object recognition is an important problem in computer vision, current models are unlikely to accurately classify objects in the wild. These fully supervised models need additional annotated images to classify objects in every new scenario, a task that is infeasible. However, sources such as e-commerce websites and field guides provide annotated images for many classes. In this work, we study fine-grained domain adaptation as a step towards overcoming the dataset shift between easily acquired annotated images and the real world. Adaptation has not been studied in the fine-grained setting where annotations such as attributes could be used to increase performance. Our work uses an attribute based multi-task adaptation loss to increase accuracy from a baseline of 4.1% to 19.1% in the semi-supervised adaptation case. Prior do- main adaptation works have been benchmarked on small datasets such as [46] with a total of 795 images for some domains, or simplistic datasets such as [41] consisting of digits. We perform experiments on a subset of a new challenging fine-grained dataset consisting of 1,095,021 images of 2, 657 car categories drawn from e-commerce web- sites and Google Street View.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Using Deep Learning and Google Street View to Estimate the Demographic Makeup of the US
Authors:
Timnit Gebru,
Jonathan Krause,
Yilun Wang,
Duyun Chen,
Jia Deng,
Erez Lieberman Aiden,
Li Fei-Fei
Abstract:
The United States spends more than $1B each year on initiatives such as the American Community Survey (ACS), a labor-intensive door-to-door study that measures statistics relating to race, gender, education, occupation, unemployment, and other demographic factors. Although a comprehensive source of data, the lag between demographic changes and their appearance in the ACS can exceed half a decade.…
▽ More
The United States spends more than $1B each year on initiatives such as the American Community Survey (ACS), a labor-intensive door-to-door study that measures statistics relating to race, gender, education, occupation, unemployment, and other demographic factors. Although a comprehensive source of data, the lag between demographic changes and their appearance in the ACS can exceed half a decade. As digital imagery becomes ubiquitous and machine vision techniques improve, automated data analysis may provide a cheaper and faster alternative. Here, we present a method that determines socioeconomic trends from 50 million images of street scenes, gathered in 200 American cities by Google Street View cars. Using deep learning-based computer vision techniques, we determined the make, model, and year of all motor vehicles encountered in particular neighborhoods. Data from this census of motor vehicles, which enumerated 22M automobiles in total (8% of all automobiles in the US), was used to accurately estimate income, race, education, and voting patterns, with single-precinct resolution. (The average US precinct contains approximately 1000 people.) The resulting associations are surprisingly simple and powerful. For instance, if the number of sedans encountered during a 15-minute drive through a city is higher than the number of pickup trucks, the city is likely to vote for a Democrat during the next Presidential election (88% chance); otherwise, it is likely to vote Republican (82%). Our results suggest that automated systems for monitoring demographic trends may effectively complement labor-intensive approaches, with the potential to detect trends with fine spatial resolution, in close to real time.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2017; v1 submitted 22 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
