Interpretable machine learning approach for electron antineutrino selection in a large liquid scintillator detector
Authors:
A. Gavrikov,
V. Cerrone,
A. Serafini,
R. Brugnera,
A. Garfagnini,
M. Grassi,
B. Jelmini,
L. Lastrucci,
S. Aiello,
G. Andronico,
V. Antonelli,
A. Barresi,
D. Basilico,
M. Beretta,
A. Bergnoli,
M. Borghesi,
A. Brigatti,
R. Bruno,
A. Budano,
B. Caccianiga,
A. Cammi,
R. Caruso,
D. Chiesa,
C. Clementi,
S. Dusini
, et al. (43 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Several neutrino detectors, KamLAND, Daya Bay, Double Chooz, RENO, and the forthcoming large-scale JUNO, rely on liquid scintillator to detect reactor antineutrino interactions. In this context, inverse beta decay represents the golden channel for antineutrino detection, providing a pair of correlated events, thus a strong experimental signature to distinguish the signal from a variety of backgrou…
▽ More
Several neutrino detectors, KamLAND, Daya Bay, Double Chooz, RENO, and the forthcoming large-scale JUNO, rely on liquid scintillator to detect reactor antineutrino interactions. In this context, inverse beta decay represents the golden channel for antineutrino detection, providing a pair of correlated events, thus a strong experimental signature to distinguish the signal from a variety of backgrounds. However, given the low cross-section of antineutrino interactions, the development of a powerful event selection algorithm becomes imperative to achieve effective discrimination between signal and backgrounds. In this study, we introduce a machine learning (ML) model to achieve this goal: a fully connected neural network as a powerful signal-background discriminator for a large liquid scintillator detector. We demonstrate, using the JUNO detector as an example, that, despite the already high efficiency of a cut-based approach, the presented ML model can further improve the overall event selection efficiency. Moreover, it allows for the retention of signal events at the detector edges that would otherwise be rejected because of the overwhelming amount of background events in that region. We also present the first interpretable analysis of the ML approach for event selection in reactor neutrino experiments. This method provides insights into the decision-making process of the model and offers valuable information for improving and updating traditional event selection approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Data-Driven Short-Term Daily Operational Sea Ice Regional Forecasting
Authors:
Timofey Grigoryev,
Polina Verezemskaya,
Mikhail Krinitskiy,
Nikita Anikin,
Alexander Gavrikov,
Ilya Trofimov,
Nikita Balabin,
Aleksei Shpilman,
Andrei Eremchenko,
Sergey Gulev,
Evgeny Burnaev,
Vladimir Vanovskiy
Abstract:
Global warming made the Arctic available for marine operations and created demand for reliable operational sea ice forecasts to make them safe. While ocean-ice numerical models are highly computationally intensive, relatively lightweight ML-based methods may be more efficient in this task. Many works have exploited different deep learning models alongside classical approaches for predicting sea ic…
▽ More
Global warming made the Arctic available for marine operations and created demand for reliable operational sea ice forecasts to make them safe. While ocean-ice numerical models are highly computationally intensive, relatively lightweight ML-based methods may be more efficient in this task. Many works have exploited different deep learning models alongside classical approaches for predicting sea ice concentration in the Arctic. However, only a few focus on daily operational forecasts and consider the real-time availability of data they need for operation. In this work, we aim to close this gap and investigate the performance of the U-Net model trained in two regimes for predicting sea ice for up to the next 10 days. We show that this deep learning model can outperform simple baselines by a significant margin and improve its quality by using additional weather data and training on multiple regions, ensuring its generalization abilities. As a practical outcome, we build a fast and flexible tool that produces operational sea ice forecasts in the Barents Sea, the Labrador Sea, and the Laptev Sea regions.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
Energy reconstruction for large liquid scintillator detectors with machine learning techniques: aggregated features approach
Authors:
Arsenii Gavrikov,
Yury Malyshkin,
Fedor Ratnikov
Abstract:
Large-scale detectors consisting of a liquid scintillator target surrounded by an array of photo-multiplier tubes (PMTs) are widely used in the modern neutrino experiments: Borexino, KamLAND, Daya Bay, Double Chooz, RENO, and the upcoming JUNO with its satellite detector TAO. Such apparatuses are able to measure neutrino energy which can be derived from the amount of light and its spatial and temp…
▽ More
Large-scale detectors consisting of a liquid scintillator target surrounded by an array of photo-multiplier tubes (PMTs) are widely used in the modern neutrino experiments: Borexino, KamLAND, Daya Bay, Double Chooz, RENO, and the upcoming JUNO with its satellite detector TAO. Such apparatuses are able to measure neutrino energy which can be derived from the amount of light and its spatial and temporal distribution over PMT channels. However, achieving a fine energy resolution in large-scale detectors is challenging. In this work, we present machine learning methods for energy reconstruction in the JUNO detector, the most advanced of its type. We focus on positron events in the energy range of 0-10 MeV which corresponds to the main signal in JUNO -- neutrinos originated from nuclear reactor cores and detected via the inverse beta decay channel. We consider the following models: Boosted Decision Trees and Fully Connected Deep Neural Network, trained on aggregated features, calculated using the information collected by PMTs. We describe the details of our feature engineering procedure and show that machine learning models can provide the energy resolution $σ= 3\%$ at 1 MeV using subsets of engineered features. The dataset for model training and testing is generated by the Monte Carlo method with the official JUNO software.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2022; v1 submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
