Revisiting Citizen Science Through the Lens of Hybrid Intelligence
Authors:
Janet Rafner,
Miroslav Gajdacz,
Gitte Kragh,
Arthur Hjorth,
Anna Gander,
Blanka Palfi,
Aleks Berditchevskaia,
François Grey,
Kobi Gal,
Avi Segal,
Mike Walmsley,
Josh Aaron Miller,
Dominik Dellerman,
Muki Haklay,
Pietro Michelucci,
Jacob Sherson
Abstract:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can augment and sometimes even replace human cognition. Inspired by efforts to value human agency alongside productivity, we discuss the benefits of solving Citizen Science (CS) tasks with Hybrid Intelligence (HI), a synergetic mixture of human and artificial intelligence. Currently there is no clear framework or methodology on how to create such an effective mixture.…
▽ More
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can augment and sometimes even replace human cognition. Inspired by efforts to value human agency alongside productivity, we discuss the benefits of solving Citizen Science (CS) tasks with Hybrid Intelligence (HI), a synergetic mixture of human and artificial intelligence. Currently there is no clear framework or methodology on how to create such an effective mixture. Due to the unique participant-centered set of values and the abundance of tasks drawing upon both human common sense and complex 21st century skills, we believe that the field of CS offers an invaluable testbed for the development of HI and human-centered AI of the 21st century, while benefiting CS as well. In order to investigate this potential, we first relate CS to adjacent computational disciplines. Then, we demonstrate that CS projects can be grouped according to their potential for HI-enhancement by examining two key dimensions: the level of digitization and the amount of knowledge or experience required for participation. Finally, we propose a framework for types of human-AI interaction in CS based on established criteria of HI. This "HI lens" provides the CS community with an overview of several ways to utilize the combination of AI and human intelligence in their projects. It also allows the AI community to gain ideas on how develo** AI in CS projects can further their own field.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
Whole-Sample Map** of Cancerous and Benign Tissue Properties
Authors:
Lydia Neary-Zajiczek,
Clara Essmann,
Neil Clancy,
Aiman Haider,
Elena Miranda,
Michael Shaw,
Amir Gander,
Brian Davidson,
Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes,
Vijay Pawar,
Danail Stoyanov
Abstract:
Structural and mechanical differences between cancerous and healthy tissue give rise to variations in macroscopic properties such as visual appearance and elastic modulus that show promise as signatures for early cancer detection. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to measure significant differences in stiffness between cancerous and healthy cells owing to its high force sensitivity and s…
▽ More
Structural and mechanical differences between cancerous and healthy tissue give rise to variations in macroscopic properties such as visual appearance and elastic modulus that show promise as signatures for early cancer detection. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to measure significant differences in stiffness between cancerous and healthy cells owing to its high force sensitivity and spatial resolution, however due to absorption and scattering of light, it is often challenging to accurately locate where AFM measurements have been made on a bulk tissue sample. In this paper we describe an image registration method that localizes AFM elastic stiffness measurements with high-resolution images of haematoxylin and eosin (H\&E)-stained tissue to within 1.5 microns. Color RGB images are segmented into three structure types (lumen, cells and stroma) by a neural network classifier trained on ground-truth pixel data obtained through k-means clustering in HSV color space. Using the localized stiffness maps and corresponding structural information, a whole-sample stiffness map is generated with a region matching and interpolation algorithm that associates similar structures with measured stiffness values. We present results showing significant differences in stiffness between healthy and cancerous liver tissue and discuss potential applications of this technique.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
