Skip to main content

Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Gamage, D

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2303.06216  [pdf

    cs.CY cs.HC cs.SI

    Moral intuitions behind deepfake-related discussions in Reddit communities

    Authors: Dilrukshi Gamage, Hariharan Ravinthran, Kazutoshi Sasahara

    Abstract: Deepfakes are AI-synthesized content that are becoming popular on many social media platforms, meaning the use of deepfakes is increasing in society, regardless of its societal implications. Its implications are harmful if the moral intuitions behind deepfakes are problematic; thus, it is important to explore how the moral intuitions behind deepfakes unfold in communities at scale. However, unders… ▽ More

    Submitted 27 February, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

    Comments: This is more related to CSCW, societal implications. Manuscript to be submitted to SM+S Journal (Sage Group)

    ACM Class: H.5.0

  2. Are Deepfakes Concerning? Analyzing Conversations of Deepfakes on Reddit and Exploring Societal Implications

    Authors: Dilrukshi Gamage, Piyush Ghasiya, Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Mark E Whiting, Kazutoshi Sasahara

    Abstract: Deepfakes are synthetic content generated using advanced deep learning and AI technologies. The advancement of technology has created opportunities for anyone to create and share deepfakes much easier. This may lead to societal concerns based on how communities engage with it. However, there is limited research available to understand how communities perceive deepfakes. We examined deepfake conver… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

    Comments: 19pgs, CHI22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems April 29-May 5, 2022 New Orleans, LA, USA

  3. Together we learn better: leveraging communities of practice for MOOC learners

    Authors: Dilrukshi Gamage, Mark E Whiting

    Abstract: MOOC participants often feel isolated and disconnected from their peers. Navigating meaningful peer interactions, generating a sense of belonging, and achieving social presence are all major challenges for MOOC platforms. MOOC users often rely on external social platforms for such connection and peer interaction, however, off-platform networking often distracts participants from their learning. Wi… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

    Comments: Asian CHI Symposium 2021

  4. arXiv:2103.04178  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.AI

    End-to-end optimized image compression for multiple machine tasks

    Authors: Lahiru D. Chamain, Fabien Racapé, Jean Bégaint, Akshay Pushparaja, Simon Feltman

    Abstract: An increasing share of captured images and videos are transmitted for storage and remote analysis by computer vision algorithms, rather than to be viewed by humans. Contrary to traditional standard codecs with engineered tools, neural network based codecs can be trained end-to-end to optimally compress images with respect to a target rate and any given differentiable performance metric. Although i… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

    Comments: supplement is added to the same document

  5. arXiv:1909.05638  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG cs.MM eess.IV stat.ML

    Faster and Accurate Classification for JPEG2000 Compressed Images in Networked Applications

    Authors: Lahiru D. Chamain, Zhi Ding

    Abstract: JPEG2000 (j2k) is a highly popular format for image and video compression.With the rapidly growing applications of cloud based image classification, most existing j2k-compatible schemes would stream compressed color images from the source before reconstruction at the processing center as inputs to deep CNNs. We propose to remove the computationally costly reconstruction step by training a deep CNN… ▽ More

    Submitted 4 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

    Comments: 9 pages

  6. arXiv:1904.06722  [pdf, other

    cs.CY cs.HC econ.GN

    Boomerang: Rebounding the Consequences of Reputation Feedback on Crowdsourcing Platforms

    Authors: Snehalkumar, S. Gaikwad, Durim Morina, Adam Ginzberg, Catherine Mullings, Shirish Goyal, Dilrukshi Gamage, Christopher Diemert, Mathias Burton, Sharon Zhou, Mark Whiting, Karolina Ziulkoski, Alipta Ballav, Aaron Gilbee, Senadhipathige S. Niranga, Vibhor Sehgal, Jasmine Lin, Leonardy Kristianto, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Jeff Regino, Nalin Chhibber, Dinesh Majeti, Sachin Sharma, Kamila Mananova, Dinesh Dhakal , et al. (13 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Paid crowdsourcing platforms suffer from low-quality work and unfair rejections, but paradoxically, most workers and requesters have high reputation scores. These inflated scores, which make high-quality work and workers difficult to find, stem from social pressure to avoid giving negative feedback. We introduce Boomerang, a reputation system for crowdsourcing that elicits more accurate feedback b… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

    ACM Class: H.5.3; H.1.2; J.4; K.4.4; K.4.3

    Journal ref: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2016

  7. arXiv:1707.05645  [pdf, other

    cs.HC

    Prototype Tasks: Improving Crowdsourcing Results through Rapid, Iterative Task Design

    Authors: Snehalkumar "Neil" S. Gaikwad, Nalin Chhibber, Vibhor Sehgal, Alipta Ballav, Catherine Mullings, Ahmed Nasser, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Aaron Gilbee, Dilrukshi Gamage, Mark Whiting, Sharon Zhou, Sekandar Matin, Senadhipathige Niranga, Shirish Goyal, Dinesh Majeti, Preethi Srinivas, Adam Ginzberg, Kamila Mananova, Karolina Ziulkoski, Jeff Regino, Tejas Sarma, Akshansh Sinha, Abhratanu Paul, Christopher Diemert, Mahesh Murag , et al. (4 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Low-quality results have been a long-standing problem on microtask crowdsourcing platforms, driving away requesters and justifying low wages for workers. To date, workers have been blamed for low-quality results: they are said to make as little effort as possible, do not pay attention to detail, and lack expertise. In this paper, we hypothesize that requesters may also be responsible for low-quali… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

    Comments: 2 pages (with 2 pages references, 2 pages Appx), HCOMP 2017, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)

    Report number: 1952894A

  8. Improving Assessment on MOOCs Through Peer Identification and Aligned Incentives

    Authors: Dilrukshi Gamage, Mark Whiting, Thejan Rajapakshe, Haritha Thilakarathne, Indika Perera, Shantha Fernando

    Abstract: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) use peer assessment to grade open ended questions at scale, allowing students to provide feedback. Relative to teacher based grading, peer assessment on MOOCs traditionally delivers lower quality feedback and fewer learner interactions. We present the identified peer review (IPR) framework, which provides non-blind peer assessment and incentives driving high qua… ▽ More

    Submitted 17 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

    Comments: To apear at Learning@Scale 2017

    ACM Class: K.3.1

  9. Crowd Guilds: Worker-led Reputation and Feedback on Crowdsourcing Platforms

    Authors: Mark E. Whiting, Dilrukshi Gamage, Snehalkumar S. Gaikwad, Aaron Gilbee, Shirish Goyal, Alipta Ballav, Dinesh Majeti, Nalin Chhibber, Angela Richmond-Fuller, Freddie Vargus, Tejas Seshadri Sarma, Varshine Chandrakanthan, Teogenes Moura, Mohamed Hashim Salih, Gabriel Bayomi Tinoco Kalejaiye, Adam Ginzberg, Catherine A. Mullings, Yoni Dayan, Kristy Milland, Henrique Orefice, Jeff Regino, Sayna Parsi, Kunz Mainali, Vibhor Sehgal, Sekandar Matin , et al. (3 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: Crowd workers are distributed and decentralized. While decentralization is designed to utilize independent judgment to promote high-quality results, it paradoxically undercuts behaviors and institutions that are critical to high-quality work. Reputation is one central example: crowdsourcing systems depend on reputation scores from decentralized workers and requesters, but these scores are notoriou… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 February, 2017; v1 submitted 4 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

    Comments: 12 pages, 6 figures, 1 table. To be presented at CSCW2017

    ACM Class: H.5.3

    Journal ref: ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1902-1913