-
Critical Point-Finding Methods Reveal Gradient-Flat Regions of Deep Network Losses
Authors:
Charles G. Frye,
James Simon,
Neha S. Wadia,
Andrew Ligeralde,
Michael R. DeWeese,
Kristofer E. Bouchard
Abstract:
Despite the fact that the loss functions of deep neural networks are highly non-convex, gradient-based optimization algorithms converge to approximately the same performance from many random initial points. One thread of work has focused on explaining this phenomenon by characterizing the local curvature near critical points of the loss function, where the gradients are near zero, and demonstratin…
▽ More
Despite the fact that the loss functions of deep neural networks are highly non-convex, gradient-based optimization algorithms converge to approximately the same performance from many random initial points. One thread of work has focused on explaining this phenomenon by characterizing the local curvature near critical points of the loss function, where the gradients are near zero, and demonstrating that neural network losses enjoy a no-bad-local-minima property and an abundance of saddle points. We report here that the methods used to find these putative critical points suffer from a bad local minima problem of their own: they often converge to or pass through regions where the gradient norm has a stationary point. We call these gradient-flat regions, since they arise when the gradient is approximately in the kernel of the Hessian, such that the loss is locally approximately linear, or flat, in the direction of the gradient. We describe how the presence of these regions necessitates care in both interpreting past results that claimed to find critical points of neural network losses and in designing second-order methods for optimizing neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Critical Point Finding with Newton-MR by Analogy to Computing Square Roots
Authors:
Charles G Frye
Abstract:
Understanding of the behavior of algorithms for resolving the optimization problem (hereafter shortened to OP) of optimizing a differentiable loss function (OP1), is enhanced by knowledge of the critical points of that loss function, i.e. the points where the gradient is 0. Here, we describe a solution to the problem of finding critical points by proposing and solving three optimization problems:…
▽ More
Understanding of the behavior of algorithms for resolving the optimization problem (hereafter shortened to OP) of optimizing a differentiable loss function (OP1), is enhanced by knowledge of the critical points of that loss function, i.e. the points where the gradient is 0. Here, we describe a solution to the problem of finding critical points by proposing and solving three optimization problems: 1) minimizing the norm of the gradient (OP2), 2) minimizing the difference between the pre-conditioned update direction and the gradient (OP3), and 3) minimizing the norm of the gradient along the update direction (OP4). The result is a recently-introduced algorithm for optimizing invex functions, Newton-MR, which turns out to be highly effective at the problem of finding the critical points of the loss surfaces of neural networks. We precede this derivation with an analogous, but simpler, derivation of the nested-optimization algorithm for computing square roots by combining Heron's Method with Newton-Raphson division.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Numerically Recovering the Critical Points of a Deep Linear Autoencoder
Authors:
Charles G. Frye,
Neha S. Wadia,
Michael R. DeWeese,
Kristofer E. Bouchard
Abstract:
Numerically locating the critical points of non-convex surfaces is a long-standing problem central to many fields. Recently, the loss surfaces of deep neural networks have been explored to gain insight into outstanding questions in optimization, generalization, and network architecture design. However, the degree to which recently-proposed methods for numerically recovering critical points actuall…
▽ More
Numerically locating the critical points of non-convex surfaces is a long-standing problem central to many fields. Recently, the loss surfaces of deep neural networks have been explored to gain insight into outstanding questions in optimization, generalization, and network architecture design. However, the degree to which recently-proposed methods for numerically recovering critical points actually do so has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this paper, we examine this issue in a case for which the ground truth is known: the deep linear autoencoder. We investigate two sub-problems associated with numerical critical point identification: first, because of large parameter counts, it is infeasible to find all of the critical points for contemporary neural networks, necessitating sampling approaches whose characteristics are poorly understood; second, the numerical tolerance for accurately identifying a critical point is unknown, and conservative tolerances are difficult to satisfy. We first identify connections between recently-proposed methods and well-understood methods in other fields, including chemical physics, economics, and algebraic geometry. We find that several methods work well at recovering certain information about loss surfaces, but fail to take an unbiased sample of critical points. Furthermore, numerical tolerance must be very strict to ensure that numerically-identified critical points have similar properties to true analytical critical points. We also identify a recently-published Newton method for optimization that outperforms previous methods as a critical point-finding algorithm. We expect our results will guide future attempts to numerically study critical points in large nonlinear neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
