-
Geometric stability via information theory
Authors:
David Ellis,
Ehud Friedgut,
Guy Kindler,
Amir Yehudayoff
Abstract:
The Loomis-Whitney inequality, and the more general Uniform Cover inequality, bound the volume of a body in terms of a product of the volumes of lower-dimensional projections of the body. In this paper, we prove stability versions of these inequalities, showing that when they are close to being tight, the body in question is close in symmetric difference to a 'box'. Our results are best possible u…
▽ More
The Loomis-Whitney inequality, and the more general Uniform Cover inequality, bound the volume of a body in terms of a product of the volumes of lower-dimensional projections of the body. In this paper, we prove stability versions of these inequalities, showing that when they are close to being tight, the body in question is close in symmetric difference to a 'box'. Our results are best possible up to a constant factor depending upon the dimension alone. Our approach is information theoretic.
We use our stability result for the Loomis-Whitney inequality to obtain a stability result for the edge-isoperimetric inequality in the infinite $d$-dimensional lattice. Namely, we prove that a subset of $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with small edge-boundary must be close in symmetric difference to a $d$-dimensional cube. Our bound is, again, best possible up to a constant factor depending upon $d$ alone.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2017; v1 submitted 29 September, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
Between Arrow and Gibbard-Satterthwaite; A representation theoretic approach
Authors:
Dvir Falik,
Ehud Friedgut
Abstract:
A central theme in social choice theory is that of impossibility theorems, such as Arrow's theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem, which state that under certain natural constraints, social choice mechanisms are impossible to construct. In recent years, beginning in Kalai`01, much work has been done in finding \textit{robust} versions of these theorems, showing "approximate" impossibility r…
▽ More
A central theme in social choice theory is that of impossibility theorems, such as Arrow's theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem, which state that under certain natural constraints, social choice mechanisms are impossible to construct. In recent years, beginning in Kalai`01, much work has been done in finding \textit{robust} versions of these theorems, showing "approximate" impossibility remains even when most, but not all, of the constraints are satisfied. We study a spectrum of settings between the case where society chooses a single outcome (รก-la-Gibbard-Satterthwaite) and the choice of a complete order (as in Arrow's theorem). We use algebraic techniques, specifically representation theory of the symmetric group, and also prove robust versions of the theorems that we state. Our relaxations of the constraints involve relaxing of a version of "independence of irrelevant alternatives", rather than relaxing the demand of a transitive outcome, as is done in most other robustness results.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2012;
originally announced March 2012.
-
A Quantitative Version of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem for Three Alternatives
Authors:
Ehud Friedgut,
Gil Kalai,
Nathan Keller,
Noam Nisan
Abstract:
The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem states that every non-dictatorial election rule among at least three alternatives can be strategically manipulated. We prove a quantitative version of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem: a random manipulation by a single random voter will succeed with a non-negligible probability for any election rule among three alternatives that is far from being a dictatorship a…
▽ More
The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem states that every non-dictatorial election rule among at least three alternatives can be strategically manipulated. We prove a quantitative version of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem: a random manipulation by a single random voter will succeed with a non-negligible probability for any election rule among three alternatives that is far from being a dictatorship and from having only two alternatives in its range.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2011;
originally announced May 2011.
-
On Sisterhood in the Gale-Shapley Matching Algorithm
Authors:
Yannai A. Gonczarowski,
Ehud Friedgut
Abstract:
Lying in order to manipulate the Gale-Shapley matching algorithm has been studied by Dubins and Friedman and by Gale and Sotomayor and was shown to be generally more appealing to the proposed-to side (denoted as the women in Gale and Shapley's original paper) than to the proposing side (denoted as men there). It can also be shown that in the case of lying women, for every woman who is better-off d…
▽ More
Lying in order to manipulate the Gale-Shapley matching algorithm has been studied by Dubins and Friedman and by Gale and Sotomayor and was shown to be generally more appealing to the proposed-to side (denoted as the women in Gale and Shapley's original paper) than to the proposing side (denoted as men there). It can also be shown that in the case of lying women, for every woman who is better-off due to lying, there exists a man who is worse-off.
In this paper, we show that an even stronger dichotomy between the goals of the sexes holds, namely, if no woman is worse-off then no man is better-off, while a form of sisterhood between the lying and the "innocent" women also holds, namely, if none of the former are worse-off, then neither is any of the latter.
This paper is based upon an undergraduate ("Amirim") thesis of the first author.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2011; v1 submitted 12 April, 2011;
originally announced April 2011.
