-
PhytNet -- Tailored Convolutional Neural Networks for Custom Botanical Data
Authors:
Jamie R. Sykes,
Katherine Denby,
Daniel W. Franks
Abstract:
Automated disease, weed and crop classification with computer vision will be invaluable in the future of agriculture. However, existing model architectures like ResNet, EfficientNet and ConvNeXt often underperform on smaller, specialised datasets typical of such projects. We address this gap with informed data collection and the development of a new CNN architecture, PhytNet. Utilising a novel dat…
▽ More
Automated disease, weed and crop classification with computer vision will be invaluable in the future of agriculture. However, existing model architectures like ResNet, EfficientNet and ConvNeXt often underperform on smaller, specialised datasets typical of such projects. We address this gap with informed data collection and the development of a new CNN architecture, PhytNet. Utilising a novel dataset of infrared cocoa tree images, we demonstrate PhytNet's development and compare its performance with existing architectures. Data collection was informed by analysis of spectroscopy data, which provided useful insights into the spectral characteristics of cocoa trees. Such information could inform future data collection and model development. Cocoa was chosen as a focal species due to the diverse pathology of its diseases, which pose significant challenges for detection. ResNet18 showed some signs of overfitting, while EfficientNet variants showed distinct signs of overfitting. By contrast, PhytNet displayed excellent attention to relevant features, no overfitting, and an exceptionally low computation cost (1.19 GFLOPS). As such PhytNet is a promising candidate for rapid disease or plant classification, or precise localisation of disease symptoms for autonomous systems.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Quality Evolvability ES: Evolving Individuals With a Distribution of Well Performing and Diverse Offspring
Authors:
Adam Katona,
Daniel W. Franks,
James Alfred Walker
Abstract:
One of the most important lessons from the success of deep learning is that learned representations tend to perform much better at any task compared to representations we design by hand. Yet evolution of evolvability algorithms, which aim to automatically learn good genetic representations, have received relatively little attention, perhaps because of the large amount of computational power they r…
▽ More
One of the most important lessons from the success of deep learning is that learned representations tend to perform much better at any task compared to representations we design by hand. Yet evolution of evolvability algorithms, which aim to automatically learn good genetic representations, have received relatively little attention, perhaps because of the large amount of computational power they require. The recent method Evolvability ES allows direct selection for evolvability with little computation. However, it can only be used to solve problems where evolvability and task performance are aligned. We propose Quality Evolvability ES, a method that simultaneously optimizes for task performance and evolvability and without this restriction. Our proposed approach Quality Evolvability has similar motivation to Quality Diversity algorithms, but with some important differences. While Quality Diversity aims to find an archive of diverse and well-performing, but potentially genetically distant individuals, Quality Evolvability aims to find a single individual with a diverse and well-performing distribution of offspring. By doing so Quality Evolvability is forced to discover more evolvable representations. We demonstrate on robotic locomotion control tasks that Quality Evolvability ES, similarly to Quality Diversity methods, can learn faster than objective-based methods and can handle deceptive problems.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2021; v1 submitted 19 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
The perceived assortativity of social networks: Methodological problems and solutions
Authors:
David N Fisher,
Matthew J Silk,
Daniel W Franks
Abstract:
Networks describe a range of social, biological and technical phenomena. An important property of a network is its degree correlation or assortativity, describing how nodes in the network associate based on their number of connections. Social networks are typically thought to be distinct from other networks in being assortative (possessing positive degree correlations); well-connected individuals…
▽ More
Networks describe a range of social, biological and technical phenomena. An important property of a network is its degree correlation or assortativity, describing how nodes in the network associate based on their number of connections. Social networks are typically thought to be distinct from other networks in being assortative (possessing positive degree correlations); well-connected individuals associate with other well-connected individuals, and poorly-connected individuals associate with each other. We review the evidence for this in the literature and find that, while social networks are more assortative than non-social networks, only when they are built using group-based methods do they tend to be positively assortative. Non-social networks tend to be disassortative. We go on to show that connecting individuals due to shared membership of a group, a commonly used method, biases towards assortativity unless a large enough number of censuses of the network are taken. We present a number of solutions to overcoming this bias by drawing on advances in sociological and biological fields. Adoption of these methods across all fields can greatly enhance our understanding of social networks and networks in general.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
