-
Clustered Planarity Variants for Level Graphs
Authors:
Simon D. Fink,
Matthias Pfretzschner,
Ignaz Rutter,
Marie Diana Sieper
Abstract:
We consider variants of the clustered planarity problem for level-planar drawings. So far, only convex clusters have been studied in this setting. We introduce two new variants that both insist on a level-planar drawing of the input graph but relax the requirements on the shape of the clusters. In unrestricted Clustered Level Planarity (uCLP) we only require that they are bounded by simple closed…
▽ More
We consider variants of the clustered planarity problem for level-planar drawings. So far, only convex clusters have been studied in this setting. We introduce two new variants that both insist on a level-planar drawing of the input graph but relax the requirements on the shape of the clusters. In unrestricted Clustered Level Planarity (uCLP) we only require that they are bounded by simple closed curves that enclose exactly the vertices of the cluster and cross each edge of the graph at most once. The problem y-monotone Clustered Level Planarity (y-CLP) requires that additionally it must be possible to augment each cluster with edges that do not cross the cluster boundaries so that it becomes connected while the graph remains level-planar, thereby mimicking a classic characterization of clustered planarity in the level-planar setting.
We give a polynomial-time algorithm for uCLP if the input graph is biconnected and has a single source. By contrast, we show that y-CLP is hard under the same restrictions and it remains NP-hard even if the number of levels is bounded by a constant and there is only a single non-trivial cluster.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Constrained Planarity in Practice -- Engineering the Synchronized Planarity Algorithm
Authors:
Simon D. Fink,
Ignaz Rutter
Abstract:
In the constrained planarity setting, we ask whether a graph admits a planar drawing that additionally satisfies a given set of constraints. These constraints are often derived from very natural problems; prominent examples are Level Planarity, where vertices have to lie on given horizontal lines indicating a hierarchy, and Clustered Planarity, where we additionally draw the boundaries of clusters…
▽ More
In the constrained planarity setting, we ask whether a graph admits a planar drawing that additionally satisfies a given set of constraints. These constraints are often derived from very natural problems; prominent examples are Level Planarity, where vertices have to lie on given horizontal lines indicating a hierarchy, and Clustered Planarity, where we additionally draw the boundaries of clusters which recursively group the vertices in a crossing-free manner. Despite receiving significant amount of attention and substantial theoretical progress on these problems, only very few of the found solutions have been put into practice and evaluated experimentally.
In this paper, we describe our implementation of the recent quadratic-time algorithm by Bläsius et al. [TALG Vol 19, No 4] for solving the problem Synchronized Planarity, which can be seen as a common generalization of several constrained planarity problems, including the aforementioned ones. Our experimental evaluation on an existing benchmark set shows that even our baseline implementation outperforms all competitors by at least an order of magnitude. We systematically investigate the degrees of freedom in the implementation of the Synchronized Planarity algorithm for larger instances and propose several modifications that further improve the performance. Altogether, this allows us to solve instances with up to 100 vertices in milliseconds and instances with up to 100 000 vertices within a few minutes.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Parameterized Complexity of Simultaneous Planarity
Authors:
Simon D. Fink,
Matthias Pfretzschner,
Ignaz Rutter
Abstract:
Given $k$ input graphs $G_1, \dots ,G_k$, where each pair $G_i$, $G_j$ with $i \neq j$ shares the same graph $G$, the problem Simultaneous Embedding With Fixed Edges (SEFE) asks whether there exists a planar drawing for each input graph such that all drawings coincide on $G$. While SEFE is still open for the case of two input graphs, the problem is NP-complete for $k \geq 3$ [Schaefer, JGAA 13]. I…
▽ More
Given $k$ input graphs $G_1, \dots ,G_k$, where each pair $G_i$, $G_j$ with $i \neq j$ shares the same graph $G$, the problem Simultaneous Embedding With Fixed Edges (SEFE) asks whether there exists a planar drawing for each input graph such that all drawings coincide on $G$. While SEFE is still open for the case of two input graphs, the problem is NP-complete for $k \geq 3$ [Schaefer, JGAA 13]. In this work, we explore the parameterized complexity of SEFE. We show that SEFE is FPT with respect to $k$ plus the vertex cover number or the feedback edge set number of the the union graph $G^\cup = G_1 \cup \dots \cup G_k$. Regarding the shared graph $G$, we show that SEFE is NP-complete, even if $G$ is a tree with maximum degree 4. Together with a known NP-hardness reduction [Angelini et al., TCS 15], this allows us to conclude that several parameters of $G$, including the maximum degree, the maximum number of degree-1 neighbors, the vertex cover number, and the number of cutvertices are intractable. We also settle the tractability of all pairs of these parameters. We give FPT algorithms for the vertex cover number plus either of the first two parameters and for the number of cutvertices plus the maximum degree, whereas we prove all remaining combinations to be intractable.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2023; v1 submitted 22 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Maintaining Triconnected Components under Node Expansion
Authors:
Simon D. Fink,
Ignaz Rutter
Abstract:
SPQR-trees are a central component of graph drawing and are also important in many further areas of computer science. From their inception onwards, they have always had a strong relation to dynamic algorithms maintaining information, e.g., on planarity and triconnectivity, under edge insertion and, later on, also deletion. In this paper, we focus on a special kind of dynamic update, the expansion…
▽ More
SPQR-trees are a central component of graph drawing and are also important in many further areas of computer science. From their inception onwards, they have always had a strong relation to dynamic algorithms maintaining information, e.g., on planarity and triconnectivity, under edge insertion and, later on, also deletion. In this paper, we focus on a special kind of dynamic update, the expansion of vertices into arbitrary biconnected graphs, while maintaining the SPQR-tree and further information. This will also allow us to efficiently merge two SPQR-trees by identifying the edges incident to two vertices with each other. We do this working along an axiomatic definition lifting the SPQR-tree to a stand-alone data structure that can be modified independently from the graph it might have been derived from. Making changes to this structure, we can now observe how the graph represented by the SPQR-tree changes, instead of having to reason which updates to the SPQR-tree are necessary after a change to the represented graph.
Using efficient expansions and merges allows us to improve the runtime of the Synchronized Planarity algorithm by Bläsius et al. [ESA 2021] from $O(m^2)$ to $O(m\cdot Δ)$, where $Δ$ is the maximum pipe degree. This also reduces the time for solving several constrained planarity problems, e.g. for Clustered Planarity from $O((n+d)^2)$ to $O(n+d\cdot Δ)$, where $d$ is the total number of crossings between cluster borders and edges and $Δ$ is the maximum number of edge crossings on a single cluster border.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Experimental Comparison of PC-Trees and PQ-Trees
Authors:
Simon D. Fink,
Matthias Pfretzschner,
Ignaz Rutter
Abstract:
PQ-trees and PC-trees are data structures that represent sets of linear and circular orders, respectively, subject to constraints that specific subsets of elements have to be consecutive. While equivalent to each other, PC-trees are conceptually much simpler than PQ-trees; updating a PC-trees so that a set of elements becomes consecutive requires only a single operation, whereas PQ-trees use an up…
▽ More
PQ-trees and PC-trees are data structures that represent sets of linear and circular orders, respectively, subject to constraints that specific subsets of elements have to be consecutive. While equivalent to each other, PC-trees are conceptually much simpler than PQ-trees; updating a PC-trees so that a set of elements becomes consecutive requires only a single operation, whereas PQ-trees use an update procedure that is described in terms of nine transformation templates that have to be recursively matched and applied.
Despite these theoretical advantages, to date no practical PC-tree implementation is available. This might be due to the original description by Hsu and McConnell in some places only sketching the details of the implementation. In this paper, we describe two alternative implementations of PC-trees. For the first one, we follow the approach by Hsu and McConnell, filling in the necessary details and also proposing improvements on the original algorithm. For the second one, we use a different technique for efficiently representing the tree using a Union-Find data structure. In an extensive experimental evaluation we compare our implementations to a variety of other implementations of PQ-trees that are available on the web as part of academic and other software libraries. Our results show that both PC-tree implementations beat their closest fully correct competitor, the PQ-tree implementation from the OGDF library, by a factor of 2 to 4, showing that PC-trees are not only conceptually simpler but also fast in practice. Moreover, we find the Union-Find-based implementation, while having a slightly worse asymptotic runtime, to be twice as fast as the one based on the description by Hsu and McConnell.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Synchronized Planarity with Applications to Constrained Planarity Problems
Authors:
Thomas Bläsius,
Simon D. Fink,
Ignaz Rutter
Abstract:
We introduce the problem Synchronized Planarity. Roughly speaking, its input is a loop-free multi-graph together with synchronization constraints that, e.g., match pairs of vertices of equal degree by providing a bijection between their edges. Synchronized Planarity then asks whether the graph admits a crossing-free embedding into the plane such that the orders of edges around synchronized vertice…
▽ More
We introduce the problem Synchronized Planarity. Roughly speaking, its input is a loop-free multi-graph together with synchronization constraints that, e.g., match pairs of vertices of equal degree by providing a bijection between their edges. Synchronized Planarity then asks whether the graph admits a crossing-free embedding into the plane such that the orders of edges around synchronized vertices are consistent. We show, on the one hand, that Synchronized Planarity can be solved in quadratic time, and, on the other hand, that it serves as a powerful modeling language that lets us easily formulate several constrained planarity problems as instances of Synchronized Planarity. In particular, this lets us solve Clustered Planarity in quadratic time, where the most efficient previously known algorithm has an upper bound of $O(n^{8})$.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2021; v1 submitted 30 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Debugging Crashes using Continuous Contrast Set Mining
Authors:
Rebecca Qian,
Yang Yu,
Wonhee Park,
Vijayaraghavan Murali,
Stephen Fink,
Satish Chandra
Abstract:
Facebook operates a family of services used by over two billion people daily on a huge variety of mobile devices. Many devices are configured to upload crash reports should the app crash for any reason. Engineers monitor and triage millions of crash reports logged each day to check for bugs, regressions, and any other quality problems. Debugging groups of crashes is a manually intensive process th…
▽ More
Facebook operates a family of services used by over two billion people daily on a huge variety of mobile devices. Many devices are configured to upload crash reports should the app crash for any reason. Engineers monitor and triage millions of crash reports logged each day to check for bugs, regressions, and any other quality problems. Debugging groups of crashes is a manually intensive process that requires deep domain expertise and close inspection of traces and code, often under time constraints. We use contrast set mining, a form of discriminative pattern mining, to learn what distinguishes one group of crashes from another. Prior works focus on discretization to apply contrast mining to continuous data. We propose the first direct application of contrast learning to continuous data, without the need for discretization. We also define a weighted anomaly score that unifies continuous and categorical contrast sets while mitigating bias, as well as uncertainty measures that communicate confidence to developers. We demonstrate the value of our novel statistical improvements by applying it on a challenging dataset from Facebook production logs, where we achieve 40x speedup over baseline approaches using discretization.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Serverless Computing: Current Trends and Open Problems
Authors:
Ioana Baldini,
Paul Castro,
Kerry Chang,
Perry Cheng,
Stephen Fink,
Vatche Ishakian,
Nick Mitchell,
Vinod Muthusamy,
Rodric Rabbah,
Aleksander Slominski,
Philippe Suter
Abstract:
Serverless computing has emerged as a new compelling paradigm for the deployment of applications and services. It represents an evolution of cloud programming models, abstractions, and platforms, and is a testament to the maturity and wide adoption of cloud technologies. In this chapter, we survey existing serverless platforms from industry, academia, and open source projects, identify key charact…
▽ More
Serverless computing has emerged as a new compelling paradigm for the deployment of applications and services. It represents an evolution of cloud programming models, abstractions, and platforms, and is a testament to the maturity and wide adoption of cloud technologies. In this chapter, we survey existing serverless platforms from industry, academia, and open source projects, identify key characteristics and use cases, and describe technical challenges and open problems.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Macro-Economic Time Series Modeling and Interaction Networks
Authors:
Gabriel Kronberger,
Stefan Fink,
Michael Kommenda,
Michael Affenzeller
Abstract:
Macro-economic models describe the dynamics of economic quantities. The estimations and forecasts produced by such models play a substantial role for financial and political decisions. In this contribution we describe an approach based on genetic programming and symbolic regression to identify variable interactions in large datasets. In the proposed approach multiple symbolic regression runs are e…
▽ More
Macro-economic models describe the dynamics of economic quantities. The estimations and forecasts produced by such models play a substantial role for financial and political decisions. In this contribution we describe an approach based on genetic programming and symbolic regression to identify variable interactions in large datasets. In the proposed approach multiple symbolic regression runs are executed for each variable of the dataset to find potentially interesting models. The result is a variable interaction network that describes which variables are most relevant for the approximation of each variable of the dataset. This approach is applied to a macro-economic dataset with monthly observations of important economic indicators in order to identify potentially interesting dependencies of these indicators. The resulting interaction network of macro-economic indicators is briefly discussed and two of the identified models are presented in detail. The two models approximate the help wanted index and the CPI inflation in the US.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2013; v1 submitted 10 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
