-
In Situ AI Prototy**: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
Authors:
Savvas Petridis,
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Vivian Tsai,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototy** AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-c…
▽ More
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototy** AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-case-specific prototype, there is a crucial need to understand the wide range of in-the-wild input likely to be provided by the user, as well as their in-context expectations of the AI's behavior. To explore the concept of in situ AI prototy** and testing, we created MobileMaker: an AI prototy** tool that enables designers to rapidly create mobile AI prototypes that can be tested on-device, and enables testers to make on-device, in-the-field revisions of the prototype through natural language. In an exploratory study with 16 users, we explored how user feedback on prototypes created with MobileMaker compares to that of existing prototy** tools (e.g., Figma, prompt editors). We found that MobileMaker prototypes enabled more serendipitous discovery of: model input edge cases, discrepancies between AI's and user's in-context interpretation of the task, and contextual signals missed by the AI. Furthermore, we learned that while the ability to make in-the-wild revisions led users to feel more fulfilled as active participants in the design process, it might also constrain their feedback to the subset of changes perceived as more actionable or implementable by the prototy** tool.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
"We Need Structured Output": Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output
Authors:
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Frederick Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Terry Koo,
Lucas Dixon,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective…
▽ More
Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective. We identified 134 concrete use cases for constraints at two levels: low-level, which ensures the output adhere to a structured format and an appropriate length, and high-level, which requires the output to follow semantic and stylistic guidelines without hallucination. Critically, applying output constraints could not only streamline the currently repetitive process of develo**, testing, and integrating LLM prompts for developers, but also enhance the user experience of LLM-powered features and applications. We conclude with a discussion on user preferences and needs towards articulating intended constraints for LLMs, alongside an initial design for a constraint prototy** tool.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
A Word is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Prompts as AI Design Material
Authors:
Chinmay Kulkarni,
Stefania Druga,
Minsuk Chang,
Alex Fiannaca,
Carrie Cai,
Michael Terry
Abstract:
Recent advances in Machine-Learning have led to the development of models that generate images based on a text description.Such large prompt-based text to image models (TTIs), trained on a considerable amount of data, allow the creation of high-quality images by users with no graphics or design training. This paper examines the role such TTI models can playin collaborative, goal-oriented design. T…
▽ More
Recent advances in Machine-Learning have led to the development of models that generate images based on a text description.Such large prompt-based text to image models (TTIs), trained on a considerable amount of data, allow the creation of high-quality images by users with no graphics or design training. This paper examines the role such TTI models can playin collaborative, goal-oriented design. Through a within-subjects study with 14 non-professional designers, we find that such models can help participants explore a design space rapidly and allow for fluid collaboration. We also find that text inputs to such models ("prompts") act as reflective design material, facilitating exploration, iteration, and reflection in pair design. This work contributes to the future of collaborative design supported by generative AI by providing an account of how text-to-image models influence the design process and the social dynamics around design and suggesting implications for tool design
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
The Prompt Artists
Authors:
Minsuk Chang,
Stefania Druga,
Alex Fiannaca,
Pedro Vergani,
Chinmay Kulkarni,
Carrie Cai,
Michael Terry
Abstract:
This paper examines the art practices, artwork, and motivations of prolific users of the latest generation of text-to-image models. Through interviews, observations, and a user survey, we present a sampling of the artistic styles and describe the developed community of practice around generative AI. We find that: 1) the text prompt and the resulting image can be considered collectively as an art p…
▽ More
This paper examines the art practices, artwork, and motivations of prolific users of the latest generation of text-to-image models. Through interviews, observations, and a user survey, we present a sampling of the artistic styles and describe the developed community of practice around generative AI. We find that: 1) the text prompt and the resulting image can be considered collectively as an art piece prompts as art and 2) prompt templates (prompts with ``slots'' for others to fill in with their own words) are developed to create generative art styles. We discover that the value placed by this community on unique outputs leads to artists seeking specialized vocabulary to produce distinctive art pieces (e.g., by reading architectural blogs to find phrases to describe images). We also find that some artists use "glitches" in the model that can be turned into artistic styles of their own right. From these findings, we outline specific implications for design regarding future prompting and image editing options.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
