A survey on the impact of AI-based recommenders on human behaviours: methodologies, outcomes and future directions
Authors:
Luca Pappalardo,
Emanuele Ferragina,
Salvatore Citraro,
Giuliano Cornacchia,
Mirco Nanni,
Giulio Rossetti,
Gizem Gezici,
Fosca Giannotti,
Margherita Lalli,
Daniele Gambetta,
Giovanni Mauro,
Virginia Morini,
Valentina Pansanella,
Dino Pedreschi
Abstract:
Recommendation systems and assistants (in short, recommenders) are ubiquitous in online platforms and influence most actions of our day-to-day lives, suggesting items or providing solutions based on users' preferences or requests. This survey analyses the impact of recommenders in four human-AI ecosystems: social media, online retail, urban map** and generative AI ecosystems. Its scope is to sys…
▽ More
Recommendation systems and assistants (in short, recommenders) are ubiquitous in online platforms and influence most actions of our day-to-day lives, suggesting items or providing solutions based on users' preferences or requests. This survey analyses the impact of recommenders in four human-AI ecosystems: social media, online retail, urban map** and generative AI ecosystems. Its scope is to systematise a fast-growing field in which terminologies employed to classify methodologies and outcomes are fragmented and unsystematic. We follow the customary steps of qualitative systematic review, gathering 144 articles from different disciplines to develop a parsimonious taxonomy of: methodologies employed (empirical, simulation, observational, controlled), outcomes observed (concentration, model collapse, diversity, echo chamber, filter bubble, inequality, polarisation, radicalisation, volume), and their level of analysis (individual, item, model, and systemic). We systematically discuss all findings of our survey substantively and methodologically, highlighting also potential avenues for future research. This survey is addressed to scholars and practitioners interested in different human-AI ecosystems, policymakers and institutional stakeholders who want to understand better the measurable outcomes of recommenders, and tech companies who wish to obtain a systematic view of the impact of their recommenders.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Human-AI Coevolution
Authors:
Dino Pedreschi,
Luca Pappalardo,
Emanuele Ferragina,
Ricardo Baeza-Yates,
Albert-Laszlo Barabasi,
Frank Dignum,
Virginia Dignum,
Tina Eliassi-Rad,
Fosca Giannotti,
Janos Kertesz,
Alistair Knott,
Yannis Ioannidis,
Paul Lukowicz,
Andrea Passarella,
Alex Sandy Pentland,
John Shawe-Taylor,
Alessandro Vespignani
Abstract:
Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices on online pla…
▽ More
Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices on online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often ``unintended'' social outcomes. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., technical, epistemological, legal and socio-political.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
