-
Representing Outcome-driven Higher-order Dependencies in Graphs of Disease Trajectories
Authors:
Steven J. Krieg,
Nitesh V. Chawla,
Keith Feldman
Abstract:
The widespread application of machine learning techniques to biomedical data has produced many new insights into disease progression and improving clinical care. Inspired by the flexibility and interpretability of graphs (networks), as well as the potency of sequence models like transformers and higher-order networks (HONs), we propose a method that identifies combinations of risk factors for a gi…
▽ More
The widespread application of machine learning techniques to biomedical data has produced many new insights into disease progression and improving clinical care. Inspired by the flexibility and interpretability of graphs (networks), as well as the potency of sequence models like transformers and higher-order networks (HONs), we propose a method that identifies combinations of risk factors for a given outcome and accurately encodes these higher-order relationships in a graph. Using historical data from 913,475 type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, we found that, compared to other approaches, the proposed networks encode significantly more information about the progression of T2D toward a variety of outcomes. We additionally demonstrate how structural information from the proposed graph can be used to augment the performance of transformer-based models on predictive tasks, especially when the data are noisy. By increasing the order, or memory, of the graph, we show how the proposed method illuminates key risk factors while successfully ignoring noisy elements, which facilitates analysis that is simultaneously accurate and interpretable.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
On the Relationship between Code Verifiability and Understandability
Authors:
Kobi Feldman,
Martin Kellogg,
Oscar Chaparro
Abstract:
Proponents of software verification have argued that simpler code is easier to verify: that is, that verification tools issue fewer false positives and require less human intervention when analyzing simpler code. We empirically validate this assumption by comparing the number of warnings produced by four state-of-the-art verification tools on 211 snippets of Java code with 20 metrics of code compr…
▽ More
Proponents of software verification have argued that simpler code is easier to verify: that is, that verification tools issue fewer false positives and require less human intervention when analyzing simpler code. We empirically validate this assumption by comparing the number of warnings produced by four state-of-the-art verification tools on 211 snippets of Java code with 20 metrics of code comprehensibility from human subjects in six prior studies. Our experiments, based on a statistical (meta-)analysis, show that, in aggregate, there is a small correlation (r = 0.23) between understandability and verifiability. The results support the claim that easy-to-verify code is often easier to understand than code that requires more effort to verify. Our work has implications for the users and designers of verification tools and for future attempts to automatically measure code comprehensibility: verification tools may have ancillary benefits to understandability, and measuring understandability may require reasoning about semantic, not just syntactic, code properties.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Beyond Volume: The Impact of Complex Healthcare Data on the Machine Learning Pipeline
Authors:
Keith Feldman,
Louis Faust,
Xian Wu,
Chao Huang,
Nitesh V. Chawla
Abstract:
From medical charts to national census, healthcare has traditionally operated under a paper-based paradigm. However, the past decade has marked a long and arduous transformation bringing healthcare into the digital age. Ranging from electronic health records, to digitized imaging and laboratory reports, to public health datasets, today, healthcare now generates an incredible amount of digital info…
▽ More
From medical charts to national census, healthcare has traditionally operated under a paper-based paradigm. However, the past decade has marked a long and arduous transformation bringing healthcare into the digital age. Ranging from electronic health records, to digitized imaging and laboratory reports, to public health datasets, today, healthcare now generates an incredible amount of digital information. Such a wealth of data presents an exciting opportunity for integrated machine learning solutions to address problems across multiple facets of healthcare practice and administration. Unfortunately, the ability to derive accurate and informative insights requires more than the ability to execute machine learning models. Rather, a deeper understanding of the data on which the models are run is imperative for their success. While a significant effort has been undertaken to develop models able to process the volume of data obtained during the analysis of millions of digitalized patient records, it is important to remember that volume represents only one aspect of the data. In fact, drawing on data from an increasingly diverse set of sources, healthcare data presents an incredibly complex set of attributes that must be accounted for throughout the machine learning pipeline. This chapter focuses on highlighting such challenges, and is broken down into three distinct components, each representing a phase of the pipeline. We begin with attributes of the data accounted for during preprocessing, then move to considerations during model building, and end with challenges to the interpretation of model output. For each component, we present a discussion around data as it relates to the healthcare domain and offer insight into the challenges each may impose on the efficiency of machine learning techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2018; v1 submitted 1 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
