Comparison of 1D and 3D Models for the Estimation of Fractional Flow Reserve
Authors:
P. J. Blanco,
C. A. Bulant,
L. O. Müller,
G. D. Maso Talou,
C. Guedes Bezerra,
P. L. Lemos,
R. A. Feijóo
Abstract:
In this work we propose to validate the predictive capabilities of one-dimensional (1D) blood flow models with full three-dimensional (3D) models in the context of patient-specific coronary hemodynamics in hyperemic conditions. Such conditions mimic the state of coronary circulation during the acquisition of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) index. Demonstrating that 1D models accurately reproduce…
▽ More
In this work we propose to validate the predictive capabilities of one-dimensional (1D) blood flow models with full three-dimensional (3D) models in the context of patient-specific coronary hemodynamics in hyperemic conditions. Such conditions mimic the state of coronary circulation during the acquisition of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) index. Demonstrating that 1D models accurately reproduce FFR estimates obtained with 3D models has implications in the approach to computationally estimate FFR. To this end, a sample of 20 patients was employed from which 29 3D geometries of arterial trees were constructed, 9 obtained from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and 20 from intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS). For each 3D arterial model, a 1D counterpart was generated. The same outflow and inlet pressure boundary conditions were applied to both (3D and 1D) models. In the 1D setting, pressure losses at stenoses and bifurcations were accounted for through specific lumped models. Comparisons between 1D models ($\text{FFR}_{\text{1D}}$) and 3D models ($\text{FFR}_{\text{3D}}$) were performed in terms of predicted $\text{FFR}$ value. Compared to $\text{FFR}_{\text{3D}}$, $\text{FFR}_{\text{1D}}$ resulted with a difference of 0.00$\pm$0.03 and overall predictive capability AUC, Acc, Spe, Sen, PPV and NPV of 0.97, 0.98, 0.90, 0.99, 0.82, and 0.99, with an FFR threshold of 0.8. We conclude that inexpensive $\text{FFR}_{\text{1D}}$ simulations can be reliably used as a surrogate of demanding $\text{FFR}_{\text{3D}}$ computations.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
Quasi-Linear Soft Tissue Models Revisited
Authors:
J. S. Espinoza Ortiz,
Gilson A. Giraldi,
E. A. de Souza Neto,
Raul A. Feijóo
Abstract:
Incompressibility, nonlinear deformation under stress and viscoelasticity are the fingerprint of soft tissue mechanical behavior. In order to model soft tissues appropriately, we must pursue to complete these requirements. In this work we revisited different soft tissue quasi-linear model possibilities in trying to achieve for this commitment.
Incompressibility, nonlinear deformation under stress and viscoelasticity are the fingerprint of soft tissue mechanical behavior. In order to model soft tissues appropriately, we must pursue to complete these requirements. In this work we revisited different soft tissue quasi-linear model possibilities in trying to achieve for this commitment.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2006;
originally announced February 2006.
