Skip to main content

Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Faw, M

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2302.06570  [pdf, ps, other

    stat.ML cs.LG math.OC

    Beyond Uniform Smoothness: A Stopped Analysis of Adaptive SGD

    Authors: Matthew Faw, Litu Rout, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay Shakkottai

    Abstract: This work considers the problem of finding a first-order stationary point of a non-convex function with potentially unbounded smoothness constant using a stochastic gradient oracle. We focus on the class of $(L_0,L_1)$-smooth functions proposed by Zhang et al. (ICLR'20). Empirical evidence suggests that these functions more closely captures practical machine learning problems as compared to the pe… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

  2. arXiv:2202.05791  [pdf, other

    stat.ML cs.LG math.OC

    The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variance

    Authors: Matthew Faw, Isidoros Tziotis, Constantine Caramanis, Aryan Mokhtari, Sanjay Shakkottai, Rachel Ward

    Abstract: We study convergence rates of AdaGrad-Norm as an exemplar of adaptive stochastic gradient methods (SGD), where the step sizes change based on observed stochastic gradients, for minimizing non-convex, smooth objectives. Despite their popularity, the analysis of adaptive SGD lags behind that of non adaptive methods in this setting. Specifically, all prior works rely on some subset of the following a… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 July, 2022; v1 submitted 11 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

    Comments: Accepted to COLT 2022

  3. Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities via Greedy-Ordered Selection

    Authors: Constantine Caramanis, Paul Dütting, Matthew Faw, Federico Fusco, Philip Lazos, Stefano Leonardi, Orestis Papadigenopoulos, Emmanouil Pountourakis, Rebecca Reiffenhäuser

    Abstract: We study single-sample prophet inequalities (SSPIs), i.e., prophet inequalities where only a single sample from each prior distribution is available. Besides a direct, and optimal, SSPI for the basic single choice problem [Rubinstein et al., 2020], most existing SSPI results were obtained via an elegant, but inherently lossy, reduction to order-oblivious secretary (OOS) policies [Azar et al., 2014… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 4 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

    Comments: Merges and extends arXiv:2103.13089 [cs.GT] and arXiv:2104.02050 [cs.DS]

    Journal ref: Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2022)

  4. arXiv:2103.13089  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.GT cs.DS

    Single-Sample Prophet Inequalities Revisited

    Authors: Constantine Caramanis, Matthew Faw, Orestis Papadigenopoulos, Emmanouil Pountourakis

    Abstract: The study of the prophet inequality problem in the limited information regime was initiated by Azar et al. [SODA'14] in the pursuit of prior-independent posted-price mechanisms. As they show, $O(1)$-competitive policies are achievable using only a single sample from the distribution of each agent. A notable portion of their results relies on reducing the design of single-sample prophet inequalitie… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 November, 2021; v1 submitted 24 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

    Comments: See arXiv:2111.03174 for the latest version of this paper (merged with arXiv:2104.02050)

  5. arXiv:1907.10154  [pdf, other

    stat.ML cs.IT cs.LG

    Mix and Match: An Optimistic Tree-Search Approach for Learning Models from Mixture Distributions

    Authors: Matthew Faw, Rajat Sen, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay Shakkottai

    Abstract: We consider a covariate shift problem where one has access to several different training datasets for the same learning problem and a small validation set which possibly differs from all the individual training distributions. This covariate shift is caused, in part, due to unobserved features in the datasets. The objective, then, is to find the best mixture distribution over the training datasets… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 July, 2020; v1 submitted 23 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

    Comments: New from previous version: Adds Acknowledgements section