The 1st Data Science for Pavements Challenge
Authors:
Ashkan Behzadian,
Tanner Wambui Muturi,
Tianjie Zhang,
Hongmin Kim,
Amanda Mullins,
Yang Lu,
Neema Jasika Owor,
Yaw Adu-Gyamfi,
William Buttlar,
Majidifard Hamed,
Armstrong Aboah,
David Mensching,
Spragg Robert,
Matthew Corrigan,
Jack Youtchef,
Dave Eshan
Abstract:
The Data Science for Pavement Challenge (DSPC) seeks to accelerate the research and development of automated vision systems for pavement condition monitoring and evaluation by providing a platform with benchmarked datasets and codes for teams to innovate and develop machine learning algorithms that are practice-ready for use by industry. The first edition of the competition attracted 22 teams from…
▽ More
The Data Science for Pavement Challenge (DSPC) seeks to accelerate the research and development of automated vision systems for pavement condition monitoring and evaluation by providing a platform with benchmarked datasets and codes for teams to innovate and develop machine learning algorithms that are practice-ready for use by industry. The first edition of the competition attracted 22 teams from 8 countries. Participants were required to automatically detect and classify different types of pavement distresses present in images captured from multiple sources, and under different conditions. The competition was data-centric: teams were tasked to increase the accuracy of a predefined model architecture by utilizing various data modification methods such as cleaning, labeling and augmentation. A real-time, online evaluation system was developed to rank teams based on the F1 score. Leaderboard results showed the promise and challenges of machine for advancing automation in pavement monitoring and evaluation. This paper summarizes the solutions from the top 5 teams. These teams proposed innovations in the areas of data cleaning, annotation, augmentation, and detection parameter tuning. The F1 score for the top-ranked team was approximately 0.9. The paper concludes with a review of different experiments that worked well for the current challenge and those that did not yield any significant improvement in model accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
