-
The Safety Challenges of Deep Learning in Real-World Type 1 Diabetes Management
Authors:
Harry Emerson,
Ryan McConville,
Matthew Guy
Abstract:
Blood glucose simulation allows the effectiveness of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management strategies to be evaluated without patient harm. Deep learning algorithms provide a promising avenue for extending simulator capabilities; however, these algorithms are limited in that they do not necessarily learn physiologically correct glucose dynamics and can learn incorrect and potentially dangerous relation…
▽ More
Blood glucose simulation allows the effectiveness of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management strategies to be evaluated without patient harm. Deep learning algorithms provide a promising avenue for extending simulator capabilities; however, these algorithms are limited in that they do not necessarily learn physiologically correct glucose dynamics and can learn incorrect and potentially dangerous relationships from confounders in training data. This is likely to be more important in real-world scenarios, as data is not collected under strict research protocol. This work explores the implications of using deep learning algorithms trained on real-world data to model glucose dynamics. Free-living data was processed from the OpenAPS Data Commons and supplemented with patient-reported tags of challenging diabetes events, constituting one of the most detailed real-world T1D datasets. This dataset was used to train and evaluate state-of-the-art glucose simulators, comparing their prediction error across safety critical scenarios and assessing the physiological appropriateness of the learned dynamics using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). While deep learning prediction accuracy surpassed the widely-used mathematical simulator approach, the model deteriorated in safety critical scenarios and struggled to leverage self-reported meal and exercise information. SHAP value analysis also indicated the model had fundamentally confused the roles of insulin and carbohydrates, which is one of the most basic T1D management principles. This work highlights the importance of considering physiological appropriateness when using deep learning to model real-world systems in T1D and healthcare more broadly, and provides recommendations for building models that are robust to real-world data constraints.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
In What Ways Are Deep Neural Networks Invariant and How Should We Measure This?
Authors:
Henry Kvinge,
Tegan H. Emerson,
Grayson Jorgenson,
Scott Vasquez,
Timothy Doster,
Jesse D. Lew
Abstract:
It is often said that a deep learning model is "invariant" to some specific type of transformation. However, what is meant by this statement strongly depends on the context in which it is made. In this paper we explore the nature of invariance and equivariance of deep learning models with the goal of better understanding the ways in which they actually capture these concepts on a formal level. We…
▽ More
It is often said that a deep learning model is "invariant" to some specific type of transformation. However, what is meant by this statement strongly depends on the context in which it is made. In this paper we explore the nature of invariance and equivariance of deep learning models with the goal of better understanding the ways in which they actually capture these concepts on a formal level. We introduce a family of invariance and equivariance metrics that allows us to quantify these properties in a way that disentangles them from other metrics such as loss or accuracy. We use our metrics to better understand the two most popular methods used to build invariance into networks: data augmentation and equivariant layers. We draw a range of conclusions about invariance and equivariance in deep learning models, ranging from whether initializing a model with pretrained weights has an effect on a trained model's invariance, to the extent to which invariance learned via training can generalize to out-of-distribution data.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Offline Reinforcement Learning for Safer Blood Glucose Control in People with Type 1 Diabetes
Authors:
Harry Emerson,
Matthew Guy,
Ryan McConville
Abstract:
The widespread adoption of effective hybrid closed loop systems would represent an important milestone of care for people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). These devices typically utilise simple control algorithms to select the optimal insulin dose for maintaining blood glucose levels within a healthy range. Online reinforcement learning (RL) has been utilised as a method for further enhancing gl…
▽ More
The widespread adoption of effective hybrid closed loop systems would represent an important milestone of care for people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). These devices typically utilise simple control algorithms to select the optimal insulin dose for maintaining blood glucose levels within a healthy range. Online reinforcement learning (RL) has been utilised as a method for further enhancing glucose control in these devices. Previous approaches have been shown to reduce patient risk and improve time spent in the target range when compared to classical control algorithms, but are prone to instability in the learning process, often resulting in the selection of unsafe actions. This work presents an evaluation of offline RL for develo** effective dosing policies without the need for potentially dangerous patient interaction during training. This paper examines the utility of BCQ, CQL and TD3-BC in managing the blood glucose of the 30 virtual patients available within the FDA-approved UVA/Padova glucose dynamics simulator. When trained on less than a tenth of the total training samples required by online RL to achieve stable performance, this work shows that offline RL can significantly increase time in the healthy blood glucose range from 61.6 +\- 0.3% to 65.3 +/- 0.5% when compared to the strongest state-of-art baseline (p < 0.001). This is achieved without any associated increase in low blood glucose events. Offline RL is also shown to be able to correct for common and challenging control scenarios such as incorrect bolus dosing, irregular meal timings and compression errors.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2023; v1 submitted 7 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
A Topological-Framework to Improve Analysis of Machine Learning Model Performance
Authors:
Henry Kvinge,
Colby Wight,
Sarah Akers,
Scott Howland,
Woongjo Choi,
Xiaolong Ma,
Luke Gosink,
Elizabeth Jurrus,
Keerti Kappagantula,
Tegan H. Emerson
Abstract:
As both machine learning models and the datasets on which they are evaluated have grown in size and complexity, the practice of using a few summary statistics to understand model performance has become increasingly problematic. This is particularly true in real-world scenarios where understanding model failure on certain subpopulations of the data is of critical importance. In this paper we propos…
▽ More
As both machine learning models and the datasets on which they are evaluated have grown in size and complexity, the practice of using a few summary statistics to understand model performance has become increasingly problematic. This is particularly true in real-world scenarios where understanding model failure on certain subpopulations of the data is of critical importance. In this paper we propose a topological framework for evaluating machine learning models in which a dataset is treated as a "space" on which a model operates. This provides us with a principled way to organize information about model performance at both the global level (over the entire test set) and also the local level (on specific subpopulations). Finally, we describe a topological data structure, presheaves, which offer a convenient way to store and analyze model performance between different subpopulations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
