-
Towards a Benchmarking Suite for Kernel Tuners
Authors:
Jacob O. Tørring,
Ben van Werkhoven,
Filip Petrovic,
Floris-Jan Willemsen,
Jirí Filipovic,
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
As computing system become more complex, it is becoming harder for programmers to keep their codes optimized as the hardware gets updated. Autotuners try to alleviate this by hiding as many architecture-based optimization details as possible from the user, so that the code can be used efficiently across different generations of systems.
In this article we introduce a new benchmark suite for eval…
▽ More
As computing system become more complex, it is becoming harder for programmers to keep their codes optimized as the hardware gets updated. Autotuners try to alleviate this by hiding as many architecture-based optimization details as possible from the user, so that the code can be used efficiently across different generations of systems.
In this article we introduce a new benchmark suite for evaluating the performance of optimization algorithms used by modern autotuners targeting GPUs. The suite contains tunable GPU kernels that are representative of real-world applications, allowing for comparisons between optimization algorithms and the examination of code optimization, search space difficulty, and performance portability. Our framework facilitates easy integration of new autotuners and benchmarks by defining a shared problem interface.
Our benchmark suite is evaluated based on five characteristics: convergence rate, local minima centrality, optimal speedup, Permutation Feature Importance (PFI), and performance portability. The results show that optimization parameters greatly impact performance and the need for global optimization. The importance of each parameter is consistent across GPU architectures, however, the specific values need to be optimized for each architecture.
Our portability study highlights the crucial importance of autotuning each application for a specific target architecture. The results reveal that simply transferring the optimal configuration from one architecture to another can result in a performance ranging from 58.5% to 99.9% of the optimal performance, depending on the GPU architecture. This highlights the importance of autotuning in modern computing systems and the value of our benchmark suite in facilitating the study of optimization algorithms and their effectiveness in achieving optimal performance for specific target architectures.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Analyzing Search Techniques for Autotuning Image-based GPU Kernels: The Impact of Sample Sizes
Authors:
Jacob O. Tørring,
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
Modern computing systems are increasingly more complex, with their multicore CPUs and GPUs accelerators changing yearly, if not more often. It thus has become very challenging to write programs that efficiently use the associated complex memory systems and take advantage of the available parallelism. Autotuning addresses this by optimizing parameterized code to the targeted hardware by searching f…
▽ More
Modern computing systems are increasingly more complex, with their multicore CPUs and GPUs accelerators changing yearly, if not more often. It thus has become very challenging to write programs that efficiently use the associated complex memory systems and take advantage of the available parallelism. Autotuning addresses this by optimizing parameterized code to the targeted hardware by searching for the optimal set of parameters. Empirical autotuning has therefore gained interest during the past decades. While new autotuning algorithms are regularly presented and published, we will show why comparing these autotuning algorithms is a deceptively difficult task.
In this paper, we describe our empirical study of state-of-the-art search techniques for autotuning by comparing them on a range of sample sizes, benchmarks and architectures. We optimize 6 tunable parameters with a search-space size of over 2 million. The algorithms studied include Random Search (RS), Random Forest Regression (RF), Genetic Algorithms (GA), Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processes (BO GP) and Bayesian Optimization with Tree-Parzen Estimators (BO TPE).
Our results on the ImageCL benchmark suite suggest that the ideal autotuning algorithm heavily depends on the sample size. In our study, BO GP and BO TPE outperform the other algorithms in most scenarios with sample sizes from 25 to 100. However, GA usually outperforms the others for sample sizes 200 and beyond. We generally see the most speedup to be gained over RS in the lower range of sample sizes (25-100). However, the algorithms more consistently outperform RS for higher sample sizes (200-400). Hence, no single state-of-the-art algorithm outperforms the rest for all sample sizes. Some suggestions for future work are also included.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
LS-CAT: A Large-Scale CUDA AutoTuning Dataset
Authors:
Lars Bjertnes,
Jacob O. Tørring,
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
The effectiveness of Machine Learning (ML) methods depend on access to large suitable datasets. In this article, we present how we build the LS-CAT (Large-Scale CUDA AutoTuning) dataset sourced from GitHub for the purpose of training NLP-based ML models. Our dataset includes 19 683 CUDA kernels focused on linear algebra. In addition to the CUDA codes, our LS-CAT dataset contains 5 028 536 associat…
▽ More
The effectiveness of Machine Learning (ML) methods depend on access to large suitable datasets. In this article, we present how we build the LS-CAT (Large-Scale CUDA AutoTuning) dataset sourced from GitHub for the purpose of training NLP-based ML models. Our dataset includes 19 683 CUDA kernels focused on linear algebra. In addition to the CUDA codes, our LS-CAT dataset contains 5 028 536 associated runtimes, with different combinations of kernels, block sizes and matrix sizes. The runtime are GPU benchmarks on both Nvidia GTX 980 and Nvidia T4 systems. This information creates a foundation upon which NLP-based models can find correlations between source-code features and optimal choice of thread block sizes.
There are several results that can be drawn out of our LS-CAT database. E.g., our experimental results show that an optimal choice in thread block size can gain an average of 6% for the average case. We thus also analyze how much performance increase can be achieved in general, finding that in 10% of the cases more than 20% performance increase can be achieved by using the optimal block. A description of current and future work is also included.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Autotuning Benchmarking Techniques: A Roofline Model Case Study
Authors:
Jacob Odgård Tørring,
Jan Christian Meyer,
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
Peak performance metrics published by vendors often do not correspond to what can be achieved in practice. It is therefore of great interest to do extensive benchmarking on core applications and library routines. Since DGEMM is one of the most used in compute-intensive numerical codes, it is typically highly vendor optimized and of great interest for empirical benchmarks. In this paper we show how…
▽ More
Peak performance metrics published by vendors often do not correspond to what can be achieved in practice. It is therefore of great interest to do extensive benchmarking on core applications and library routines. Since DGEMM is one of the most used in compute-intensive numerical codes, it is typically highly vendor optimized and of great interest for empirical benchmarks. In this paper we show how to build a novel tool that autotunes the benchmarking process for the Roofline model. Our novel approach can efficiently and reliably find optimal configurations for any target hardware. Results of our tool on a range of hardware architectures and comparisons to theoretical peak performance are included.
Our tool autotunes the benchmarks for the target architecture by deciding the optimal parameters through state space reductions and exhaustive search. Our core idea includes calculating the confidence interval using the variance and mean and comparing it against the current optimum solution. We can then terminate the evaluation process early if the confidence interval's maximum is lower than the current optimum solution. This dynamic approach yields a search time improvement of up to 116.33x for the DGEMM benchmarking process compared to a traditional fixed sample-size methodology. Our tool produces the same benchmarking result with an error of less than 2% for each of the optimization techniques we apply, while providing a great reduction in search time. We compare these results against hand-tuned benchmarking parameters. Results from the memory-intensive TRIAD benchmark, and some ideas for future directions are also included.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 15 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
ImageCL: An Image Processing Language for Performance Portability on Heterogeneous Systems
Authors:
Thomas L. Falch,
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
Modern computer systems typically conbine multicore CPUs with accelerators like GPUs for inproved performance and energy efficiency. However, these sys- tems suffer from poor performance portability, code tuned for one device must be retuned to achieve high performance on another. Image processing is increas- ing in importance , with applications ranging from seismology and medicine to Photoshop.…
▽ More
Modern computer systems typically conbine multicore CPUs with accelerators like GPUs for inproved performance and energy efficiency. However, these sys- tems suffer from poor performance portability, code tuned for one device must be retuned to achieve high performance on another. Image processing is increas- ing in importance , with applications ranging from seismology and medicine to Photoshop. Based on our experience with medical image processing, we propose ImageCL, a high-level domain-specific language and source-to-source compiler, targeting heterogeneous hardware. ImageCL resembles OpenCL, but abstracts away per- formance optimization details, allowing the programmer to focus on algorithm development, rather than performance tuning. The latter is left to our source-to- source compiler and auto-tuner. From high-level ImageCL kernels, our source- to-source compiler can generate multiple OpenCL implementations with different optimizations applied. We rely on auto-tuning rather than machine models or ex- pert programmer knowledge to determine which optimizations to apply, making our tuning procedure highly robust. Furthermore, we can generate high perform- ing implementations for different devices from a single source code, thereby im- proving performance portability. We evaluate our approach on three image processing benchmarks, on different GPU and CPU devices, and are able to outperform other state of the art solutions in several cases, achieving speedups of up to 4.57x.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Machine Learning Based Auto-tuning for Enhanced OpenCL Performance Portability
Authors:
Thomas L. Falch,
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
Heterogeneous computing, which combines devices with different architectures, is rising in popularity, and promises increased performance combined with reduced energy consumption. OpenCL has been proposed as a standard for programing such systems, and offers functional portability. It does, however, suffer from poor performance portability, code tuned for one device must be re-tuned to achieve goo…
▽ More
Heterogeneous computing, which combines devices with different architectures, is rising in popularity, and promises increased performance combined with reduced energy consumption. OpenCL has been proposed as a standard for programing such systems, and offers functional portability. It does, however, suffer from poor performance portability, code tuned for one device must be re-tuned to achieve good performance on another device. In this paper, we use machine learning-based auto-tuning to address this problem. Benchmarks are run on a random subset of the entire tuning parameter configuration space, and the results are used to build an artificial neural network based model. The model can then be used to find interesting parts of the parameter space for further search. We evaluate our method with different benchmarks, on several devices, including an Intel i7 3770 CPU, an Nvidia K40 GPU and an AMD Radeon HD 7970 GPU. Our model achieves a mean relative error as low as 6.1%, and is able to find configurations as little as 1.3% worse than the global minimum.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
-
Summary of the First Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE1)
Authors:
Daniel S. Katz,
Sou-Cheng T. Choi,
Hilmar Lapp,
Ketan Maheshwari,
Frank Löffler,
Matthew Turk,
Marcus D. Hanwell,
Nancy Wilkins-Diehr,
James Hetherington,
James Howison,
Shel Swenson,
Gabrielle D. Allen,
Anne C. Elster,
Bruce Berriman,
Colin Venters
Abstract:
Challenges related to development, deployment, and maintenance of reusable software for science are becoming a growing concern. Many scientists' research increasingly depends on the quality and availability of software upon which their works are built. To highlight some of these issues and share experiences, the First Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE1)…
▽ More
Challenges related to development, deployment, and maintenance of reusable software for science are becoming a growing concern. Many scientists' research increasingly depends on the quality and availability of software upon which their works are built. To highlight some of these issues and share experiences, the First Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE1) was held in November 2013 in conjunction with the SC13 Conference. The workshop featured keynote presentations and a large number (54) of solicited extended abstracts that were grouped into three themes and presented via panels. A set of collaborative notes of the presentations and discussion was taken during the workshop.
Unique perspectives were captured about issues such as comprehensive documentation, development and deployment practices, software licenses and career paths for developers. Attribution systems that account for evidence of software contribution and impact were also discussed. These include mechanisms such as Digital Object Identifiers, publication of "software papers", and the use of online systems, for example source code repositories like GitHub.
This paper summarizes the issues and shared experiences that were discussed, including cross-cutting issues and use cases. It joins a nascent literature seeking to understand what drives software work in science, and how it is impacted by the reward systems of science. These incentives can determine the extent to which developers are motivated to build software for the long-term, for the use of others, and whether to work collaboratively or separately. It also explores community building, leadership, and dynamics in relation to successful scientific software.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2014; v1 submitted 29 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
Software for Science: Some Personal Reflections
Authors:
Anne C. Elster
Abstract:
As computer systems become more and more complex, software and tools lag more and more behind. This is especially true for scientific software that often demands high performance, and thus needs to take advantage of parallelisms, memory hierarchies and other software and systems. How do we help bridge this ever-increasing gap?
This paper describes some of my experiences and thoughts regarding li…
▽ More
As computer systems become more and more complex, software and tools lag more and more behind. This is especially true for scientific software that often demands high performance, and thus needs to take advantage of parallelisms, memory hierarchies and other software and systems. How do we help bridge this ever-increasing gap?
This paper describes some of my experiences and thoughts regarding licensing, code sharing, code maintenance, open access publishing, and educations and training. Details include my recent experiences with getting industrial funding for GPL licensed software, BSD issues, sharing code on GitHub, and how I inspire students to take my 4th year Parallel Computing elective which this semester has over 50 students enrolled. Some thoughts and comments regarding why both optimization and data locality are such a central issue for scientific software is also included.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
