-
Properties of Decentralized Consensus Technology -- Why not every Blockchain is a Blockchain
Authors:
Christopher Ehmke,
Florian Blum,
Volker Gruhn
Abstract:
Research in the field of blockchain technology and applications is increasing at a fast pace. Although the Bitcoin whitepaper by Nakamoto is already ten years old, the field can still be seen as immature and at an early stage. Current research in this area is lacking a commonly shared knowledge and consensus about terms used to describe the technology and its properties. At the same time this rese…
▽ More
Research in the field of blockchain technology and applications is increasing at a fast pace. Although the Bitcoin whitepaper by Nakamoto is already ten years old, the field can still be seen as immature and at an early stage. Current research in this area is lacking a commonly shared knowledge and consensus about terms used to describe the technology and its properties. At the same time this research is challenging fundamental aspects of the Bitcoin core concept. It has to be questioned whether all of these new approaches still adequately could be described as blockchain technology. We propose to use the term Decentralized Consensus Technology as a general category instead. Decentralized Consensus Technology consists of decentralized ledger and non-ledger technologies. Blockchain technology in turn is only one of multiple implementations of the Decentralized Ledger Technology. Furthermore, we identified three main characteristics of Decentralized Consensus Technology: decentralization, trustlessness and ability to eventually reach consensus. Depending on the use case of the specific implementation the following additional properties have to be considered: privacy, participation incentive, irreversibility and immutability, operation purpose, confirmation time, transaction costs, ability to externalize transactions and computations and scalability possibilities.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
AMZ Driverless: The Full Autonomous Racing System
Authors:
Juraj Kabzan,
Miguel de la Iglesia Valls,
Victor Reijgwart,
Hubertus Franciscus Cornelis Hendrikx,
Claas Ehmke,
Manish Prajapat,
Andreas Bühler,
Nikhil Gosala,
Mehak Gupta,
Ramya Sivanesan,
Ankit Dhall,
Eugenio Chisari,
Napat Karnchanachari,
Sonja Brits,
Manuel Dangel,
Inkyu Sa,
Renaud Dubé,
Abel Gawel,
Mark Pfeiffer,
Alexander Liniger,
John Lygeros,
Roland Siegwart
Abstract:
This paper presents the algorithms and system architecture of an autonomous racecar. The introduced vehicle is powered by a software stack designed for robustness, reliability, and extensibility. In order to autonomously race around a previously unknown track, the proposed solution combines state of the art techniques from different fields of robotics. Specifically, perception, estimation, and con…
▽ More
This paper presents the algorithms and system architecture of an autonomous racecar. The introduced vehicle is powered by a software stack designed for robustness, reliability, and extensibility. In order to autonomously race around a previously unknown track, the proposed solution combines state of the art techniques from different fields of robotics. Specifically, perception, estimation, and control are incorporated into one high-performance autonomous racecar. This complex robotic system, developed by AMZ Driverless and ETH Zurich, finished 1st overall at each competition we attended: Formula Student Germany 2017, Formula Student Italy 2018 and Formula Student Germany 2018. We discuss the findings and learnings from these competitions and present an experimental evaluation of each module of our solution.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Redundant Perception and State Estimation for Reliable Autonomous Racing
Authors:
Nikhil Bharadwaj Gosala,
Andreas Bühler,
Manish Prajapat,
Claas Ehmke,
Mehak Gupta,
Ramya Sivanesan,
Abel Gawel,
Mark Pfeiffer,
Mathias Bürki,
Inkyu Sa,
Renaud Dubé,
Roland Siegwart
Abstract:
In autonomous racing, vehicles operate close to the limits of handling and a sensor failure can have critical consequences. To limit the impact of such failures, this paper presents the redundant perception and state estimation approaches developed for an autonomous race car. Redundancy in perception is achieved by estimating the color and position of the track delimiting objects using two sensor…
▽ More
In autonomous racing, vehicles operate close to the limits of handling and a sensor failure can have critical consequences. To limit the impact of such failures, this paper presents the redundant perception and state estimation approaches developed for an autonomous race car. Redundancy in perception is achieved by estimating the color and position of the track delimiting objects using two sensor modalities independently. Specifically, learning-based approaches are used to generate color and pose estimates, from LiDAR and camera data respectively. The redundant perception inputs are fused by a particle filter based SLAM algorithm that operates in real-time. Velocity is estimated using slip dynamics, with reliability being ensured through a probabilistic failure detection algorithm. The sub-modules are extensively evaluated in real-world racing conditions using the autonomous race car "gotthard driverless", achieving lateral accelerations up to 1.7G and a top speed of 90km/h.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
