A Hyperparameter Study for Quantum Kernel Methods
Authors:
Sebastian Egginger,
Alona Sakhnenko,
Jeanette Miriam Lorenz
Abstract:
Quantum kernel methods are a promising method in quantum machine learning thanks to the guarantees connected to them. Their accessibility for analytic considerations also opens up the possibility of prescreening datasets based on their potential for a quantum advantage. To do so, earlier works developed the geometric difference, which can be understood as a closeness measure between two kernel-bas…
▽ More
Quantum kernel methods are a promising method in quantum machine learning thanks to the guarantees connected to them. Their accessibility for analytic considerations also opens up the possibility of prescreening datasets based on their potential for a quantum advantage. To do so, earlier works developed the geometric difference, which can be understood as a closeness measure between two kernel-based machine learning approaches, most importantly between a quantum kernel and classical kernel. This metric links the quantum and classical model complexities. Therefore, it raises the question of whether the geometric difference, based on its relation to model complexity, can be a useful tool in evaluations other than for the potential for quantum advantage. In this work, we investigate the effects of hyperparameter choice on the model performance and the generalization gap between classical and quantum kernels. The importance of hyperparameter optimization is well known also for classical machine learning. Especially for the quantum Hamiltonian evolution feature map, the scaling of the input data has been shown to be crucial. However, there are additional parameters left to be optimized, like the best number of qubits to trace out before computing a projected quantum kernel. We investigate the influence of these hyperparameters and compare the classically reliable method of cross validation with the method of choosing based on the geometric difference. Based on the thorough investigation of the hyperparameters across 11 datasets we identified commodities that can be exploited when examining a new dataset. In addition, our findings contribute to better understanding of the applicability of the geometric difference.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 18 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
