-
Stable matching as transportation
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Joseph Root,
Fedor Sandomirskiy
Abstract:
We study matching markets with aligned preferences and establish a connection between common design objectives -- stability, efficiency, and fairness -- and the theory of optimal transport. Optimal transport gives new insights into the structural properties of matchings obtained from pursuing these objectives, and into the trade-offs between different objectives. Matching markets with aligned pref…
▽ More
We study matching markets with aligned preferences and establish a connection between common design objectives -- stability, efficiency, and fairness -- and the theory of optimal transport. Optimal transport gives new insights into the structural properties of matchings obtained from pursuing these objectives, and into the trade-offs between different objectives. Matching markets with aligned preferences provide a tractable stylized model capturing supply-demand imbalances in a range of settings such as partnership formation, school choice, organ donor exchange, and markets with transferable utility where bargaining over transfers happens after a match is formed.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Individual and Collective Welfare in Risk Sharing with Many States
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Farzad Pourbabaee
Abstract:
We investigate the effects of a large (but finite) state space on models of efficient risk sharing. A group of risk-averse agents agree on a risk-sharing agreement in an economy without aggregate risk. The economy is subject to a perturbation, or shock, that prompts a renegotiation of the agreement. If agents insist on an $\ep$-utility improvement to accept a new agreement, then the probability of…
▽ More
We investigate the effects of a large (but finite) state space on models of efficient risk sharing. A group of risk-averse agents agree on a risk-sharing agreement in an economy without aggregate risk. The economy is subject to a perturbation, or shock, that prompts a renegotiation of the agreement. If agents insist on an $\ep$-utility improvement to accept a new agreement, then the probability of a post-shock acceptable agreement vanishes exponentially to zero as the number of states grows. We use similar arguments to consider a model where agents have multiple prior preferences, and show that the existence of an $\ep$-Pareto improving trade requires that some sets of priors have vanishingly small measure. Our results hinge on the "shape does not matter" message of high dimensional isoperimetric inequalities.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2024; v1 submitted 14 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Binary Mechanisms under Privacy-Preserving Noise
Authors:
Farzad Pourbabaee,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We study mechanism design for public-good provision under a noisy privacy-preserving transformation of individual agents' reported preferences. The setting is a standard binary model with transfers and quasi-linear utility. Agents report their preferences for the public good, which are randomly ``flipped,'' so that any individual report may be explained away as the outcome of noise. We study the t…
▽ More
We study mechanism design for public-good provision under a noisy privacy-preserving transformation of individual agents' reported preferences. The setting is a standard binary model with transfers and quasi-linear utility. Agents report their preferences for the public good, which are randomly ``flipped,'' so that any individual report may be explained away as the outcome of noise. We study the tradeoffs between preserving the public decisions made in the presence of noise (noise sensitivity), pursuing efficiency, and mitigating the effect of noise on revenue.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2024; v1 submitted 17 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Ivan Stelmakh,
Xinwei Shen,
Marina Meila,
Federico Echenique,
Shuchi Chawla,
Nihar B. Shah
Abstract:
Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conduct…
▽ More
Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conducted surveys of reviewers in two top-tier double-blind computer science conferences -- ICML 2021 (5361 submissions and 4699 reviewers) and EC 2021 (498 submissions and 190 reviewers). Our two main findings are as follows. First, more than a third of the reviewers self-report searching online for a paper they are assigned to review. Second, outside the review process, we find that preprints from better-ranked affiliations see a weakly higher visibility, with a correlation of 0.06 in ICML and 0.05 in EC. In particular, papers associated with the top-10-ranked affiliations had a visibility of approximately 11% in ICML and 22% in EC, whereas the remaining papers had a visibility of 7% and 18% respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2022; v1 submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review
Authors:
Ivan Stelmakh,
Charvi Rastogi,
Ryan Liu,
Shuchi Chawla,
Federico Echenique,
Nihar B. Shah
Abstract:
Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective reviewers to try obtaining a more positive evaluation for their submission. In this work, we investigate if such a citation bias actually exists: Does the citation of a reviewer's own work in a submission cause them to…
▽ More
Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective reviewers to try obtaining a more positive evaluation for their submission. In this work, we investigate if such a citation bias actually exists: Does the citation of a reviewer's own work in a submission cause them to be positively biased towards the submission? In conjunction with the review process of two flagship conferences in machine learning and algorithmic economics, we execute an observational study to test for citation bias in peer review. In our analysis, we carefully account for various confounding factors such as paper quality and reviewer expertise, and apply different modeling techniques to alleviate concerns regarding the model mismatch. Overall, our analysis involves 1,314 papers and 1,717 reviewers and detects citation bias in both venues we consider. In terms of the effect size, by citing a reviewer's work, a submission has a non-trivial chance of getting a higher score from the reviewer: an expected increase in the score is approximately 0.23 on a 5-point Likert item. For reference, a one-point increase of a score by a single reviewer improves the position of a submission by 11% on average.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Efficiency in Random Resource Allocation and Social Choice
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Joseph Root,
Fedor Sandomirskiy
Abstract:
We study efficiency in general collective choice problems where agents have ordinal preferences and randomization is allowed. We explore the structure of preference profiles where ex-ante and ex-post efficiency coincide, offer a unifying perspective on the known results, and give several new characterizations. The results have implications for well-studied mechanisms including random serial dictat…
▽ More
We study efficiency in general collective choice problems where agents have ordinal preferences and randomization is allowed. We explore the structure of preference profiles where ex-ante and ex-post efficiency coincide, offer a unifying perspective on the known results, and give several new characterizations. The results have implications for well-studied mechanisms including random serial dictatorship and a number of specific environments, including the dichotomous, single-peaked, and social choice domains.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2022; v1 submitted 12 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Closure operators: Complexity and applications to classification and decision-making
Authors:
Hamed Hamze Bajgiran,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We study the complexity of closure operators, with applications to machine learning and decision theory. In machine learning, closure operators emerge naturally in data classification and clustering. In decision theory, they can model equivalence of choice menus, and therefore situations with a preference for flexibility. Our contribution is to formulate a notion of complexity of closure operators…
▽ More
We study the complexity of closure operators, with applications to machine learning and decision theory. In machine learning, closure operators emerge naturally in data classification and clustering. In decision theory, they can model equivalence of choice menus, and therefore situations with a preference for flexibility. Our contribution is to formulate a notion of complexity of closure operators, which translate into the complexity of a classifier in ML, or of a utility function in decision theory.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2022; v1 submitted 10 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Incentive Compatible Active Learning
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Siddharth Prasad
Abstract:
We consider active learning under incentive compatibility constraints. The main application of our results is to economic experiments, in which a learner seeks to infer the parameters of a subject's preferences: for example their attitudes towards risk, or their beliefs over uncertain events. By cleverly adapting the experimental design, one can save on the time spent by subjects in the laboratory…
▽ More
We consider active learning under incentive compatibility constraints. The main application of our results is to economic experiments, in which a learner seeks to infer the parameters of a subject's preferences: for example their attitudes towards risk, or their beliefs over uncertain events. By cleverly adapting the experimental design, one can save on the time spent by subjects in the laboratory, or maximize the information obtained from each subject in a given laboratory session; but the resulting adaptive design raises complications due to incentive compatibility. A subject in the lab may answer questions strategically, and not truthfully, so as to steer subsequent questions in a profitable direction.
We analyze two standard economic problems: inference of preferences over risk from multiple price lists, and belief elicitation in experiments on choice over uncertainty. In the first setting, we tune a simple and fast learning algorithm to retain certain incentive compatibility properties. In the second setting, we provide an incentive compatible learning algorithm based on scoring rules with query complexity that differs from obvious methods of achieving fast learning rates only by subpolynomial factors. Thus, for these areas of application, incentive compatibility may be achieved without paying a large sample complexity price.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
New developments in revealed preference theory: decisions under risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice
Authors:
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
This survey reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theories of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments; subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty; and exponentially discounted utility for intertemporal choice. The testab…
▽ More
This survey reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theories of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments; subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty; and exponentially discounted utility for intertemporal choice. The testable implications of these theories for data on choice from classical linear budget sets are described, and shown to follow a common thread. The theories all imply an inverse relation between prices and quantities, with different qualifications depending on the functional forms in the theory under consideration.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2019; v1 submitted 20 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Fairness and efficiency for probabilistic allocations with participation constraints
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Antonio Miralles,
Jun Zhang
Abstract:
We propose a notion of fairness for allocation problems in which different agents may have different reservation utilities, stemming from different outside options, or property rights. Fairness is usually understood as the absence of envy, but this can be incompatible with reservation utilities. It is possible that Alice's envy of Bob's assignment cannot be remedied without violating Bob's partici…
▽ More
We propose a notion of fairness for allocation problems in which different agents may have different reservation utilities, stemming from different outside options, or property rights. Fairness is usually understood as the absence of envy, but this can be incompatible with reservation utilities. It is possible that Alice's envy of Bob's assignment cannot be remedied without violating Bob's participation constraint. Instead, we seek to rule out {\em justified envy}, defined as envy for which a remedy would not violate any agent's participation constraint. We show that fairness, meaning the absence of justified envy, can be achieved together with efficiency and individual rationality. We introduce a competitive equilibrium approach with price-dependent incomes obtaining the desired properties.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2020; v1 submitted 12 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
The Edgeworth Conjecture with Small Coalitions and Approximate Equilibria in Large Economies
Authors:
Siddharth Barman,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We revisit the connection between bargaining and equilibrium in exchange economies, and study its algorithmic implications. We consider bargaining outcomes to be allocations that cannot be blocked (i.e., profitably re-traded) by coalitions of small size and show that these allocations must be approximate Walrasian equilibria. Our results imply that deciding whether an allocation is approximately W…
▽ More
We revisit the connection between bargaining and equilibrium in exchange economies, and study its algorithmic implications. We consider bargaining outcomes to be allocations that cannot be blocked (i.e., profitably re-traded) by coalitions of small size and show that these allocations must be approximate Walrasian equilibria. Our results imply that deciding whether an allocation is approximately Walrasian can be done in polynomial time, even in economies for which finding an equilibrium is known to be computationally hard.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Third-Party Data Providers Ruin Simple Mechanisms
Authors:
Yang Cai,
Federico Echenique,
Hu Fu,
Katrina Ligett,
Adam Wierman,
Juba Ziani
Abstract:
Motivated by the growing prominence of third-party data providers in online marketplaces, this paper studies the impact of the presence of third-party data providers on mechanism design. When no data provider is present, it has been shown that simple mechanisms are "good enough" -- they can achieve a constant fraction of the revenue of optimal mechanisms. The results in this paper demonstrate that…
▽ More
Motivated by the growing prominence of third-party data providers in online marketplaces, this paper studies the impact of the presence of third-party data providers on mechanism design. When no data provider is present, it has been shown that simple mechanisms are "good enough" -- they can achieve a constant fraction of the revenue of optimal mechanisms. The results in this paper demonstrate that this is no longer true in the presence of a third-party data provider who can provide the bidder with a signal that is correlated with the item type. Specifically, even with a single seller, a single bidder, and a single item of uncertain type for sale, the strategies of pricing each item-type separately (the analog of item pricing for multi-item auctions) and bundling all item-types under a single price (the analog of grand bundling) can both simultaneously be a logarithmic factor worse than the optimal revenue. Further, in the presence of a data provider, item-type partitioning mechanisms---a more general class of mechanisms which divide item-types into disjoint groups and offer prices for each group---still cannot achieve within a $\log \log$ factor of the optimal revenue. Thus, our results highlight that the presence of a data-provider forces the use of more complicated mechanisms in order to achieve a constant fraction of the optimal revenue.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2020; v1 submitted 20 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
A characterization of combinatorial demand
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We prove that combinatorial demand functions are characterized by two properties: continuity and the law of demand.
We prove that combinatorial demand functions are characterized by two properties: continuity and the law of demand.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2016; v1 submitted 31 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Testing for separability is hard
Authors:
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
This paper shows that it is computationally hard to decide (or test) if a consumption data set is consistent with separable preferences.
This paper shows that it is computationally hard to decide (or test) if a consumption data set is consistent with separable preferences.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
The Empirical Implications of Privacy-Aware Choice
Authors:
Rachel Cummings,
Federico Echenique,
Adam Wierman
Abstract:
This paper initiates the study of the testable implications of choice data in settings where agents have privacy preferences. We adapt the standard conceptualization of consumer choice theory to a situation where the consumer is aware of, and has preferences over, the information revealed by her choices. The main message of the paper is that little can be inferred about consumers' preferences once…
▽ More
This paper initiates the study of the testable implications of choice data in settings where agents have privacy preferences. We adapt the standard conceptualization of consumer choice theory to a situation where the consumer is aware of, and has preferences over, the information revealed by her choices. The main message of the paper is that little can be inferred about consumers' preferences once we introduce the possibility that the consumer has concerns about privacy. This holds even when consumers' privacy preferences are assumed to be monotonic and separable. This motivates the consideration of stronger assumptions and, to that end, we introduce an additive model for privacy preferences that does have testable implications.
△ Less
Submitted 1 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
On the Existence of Low-Rank Explanations for Mixed Strategy Behavior
Authors:
Siddharth Barman,
Umang Bhaskar,
Federico Echenique,
Adam Wierman
Abstract:
Nash equilibrium is used as a model to explain the observed behavior of players in strategic settings. For example, in many empirical applications we observe player behavior, and the problem is to determine if there exist payoffs for the players for which the equilibrium corresponds to observed player behavior. Computational complexity of Nash equilibria is an important consideration in this frame…
▽ More
Nash equilibrium is used as a model to explain the observed behavior of players in strategic settings. For example, in many empirical applications we observe player behavior, and the problem is to determine if there exist payoffs for the players for which the equilibrium corresponds to observed player behavior. Computational complexity of Nash equilibria is an important consideration in this framework. If the instance of the model that explains observed player behavior requires players to have solved a computationally hard problem, then the explanation provided is questionable. In this paper we provide conditions under which Nash equilibrium is a reasonable explanation for strategic behavior, i.e., conditions under which observed behavior of players can be explained by games in which Nash equilibria are easy to compute. We identify three structural conditions and show that if the data set of observed behavior satisfies any of these conditions, then it is consistent with payoff matrices for which the observed Nash equilibria could have been computed efficiently. Our conditions admit large and structurally complex data sets of observed behavior, showing that even with complexity considerations, Nash equilibrium is often a reasonable model.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2014; v1 submitted 11 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
-
The Empirical Implications of Rank in Bimatrix Games
Authors:
Siddharth Barman,
Umang Bhaskar,
Federico Echenique,
Adam Wierman
Abstract:
We study the structural complexity of bimatrix games, formalized via rank, from an empirical perspective. We consider a setting where we have data on player behavior in diverse strategic situations, but where we do not observe the relevant payoff functions. We prove that high complexity (high rank) has empirical consequences when arbitrary data is considered. Additionally, we prove that, in more r…
▽ More
We study the structural complexity of bimatrix games, formalized via rank, from an empirical perspective. We consider a setting where we have data on player behavior in diverse strategic situations, but where we do not observe the relevant payoff functions. We prove that high complexity (high rank) has empirical consequences when arbitrary data is considered. Additionally, we prove that, in more restrictive classes of data (termed laminar), any observation is rationalizable using a low-rank game: specifically a zero-sum game. Hence complexity as a structural property of a game is not always testable. Finally, we prove a general result connecting the structure of the feasible data sets with the highest rank that may be needed to rationalize a set of observations.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
