-
Redistricting for Proportionality
Authors:
Moon Duchin,
Gabe Schoenbach
Abstract:
American democracy is currently heavily reliant on plurality in single-member districts, or PSMD, as a system of election. But public perceptions of fairness are often keyed to partisan proportionality, or the degree of congruence between each party's share of the the vote and its share of representation. PSMD has not tended to secure proportional outcomes historically, partially due to gerrymande…
▽ More
American democracy is currently heavily reliant on plurality in single-member districts, or PSMD, as a system of election. But public perceptions of fairness are often keyed to partisan proportionality, or the degree of congruence between each party's share of the the vote and its share of representation. PSMD has not tended to secure proportional outcomes historically, partially due to gerrymandering, where line-drawers intentionally extract more advantage for their side. But it is now increasingly clear that even blind PSMD is frequently disproportional, and in unpredictable ways that depend on local political geography. In this paper we consider whether it is feasible to bring PSMD into alignment with a proportionality norm by targeting proportional outcomes in the design and selection of districts. We do this mainly through a close examination of the "Freedom to Vote Test," a redistricting reform proposed in draft legislation in 2021. We find that applying the test with a proportionality target makes for sound policy: it performs well in legal battleground states and has a workable exception to handle edge cases where proportionality is out of reach.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Spanning tree methods for sampling graph partitions
Authors:
Sarah Cannon,
Moon Duchin,
Dana Randall,
Parker Rule
Abstract:
In the last decade, computational approaches to graph partitioning have made a major impact in the analysis of political redistricting, including in U.S. courts of law. Mathematically, a districting plan can be viewed as a balanced partition of a graph into connected subsets. Examining a large sample of valid alternative districting plans can help us recognize gerrymandering against an appropriate…
▽ More
In the last decade, computational approaches to graph partitioning have made a major impact in the analysis of political redistricting, including in U.S. courts of law. Mathematically, a districting plan can be viewed as a balanced partition of a graph into connected subsets. Examining a large sample of valid alternative districting plans can help us recognize gerrymandering against an appropriate neutral baseline. One algorithm that is widely used to produce random samples of districting plans is a Markov chain called recombination (or ReCom), which repeatedly fuses adjacent districts, forms a spanning tree of their union, and splits that spanning tree with a balanced cut to form new districts. One drawback is that this chain's stationary distribution has no known closed form when there are three or more districts. In this paper, we modify ReCom slightly to give it a property called reversibility, resulting in a new Markov chain, RevReCom. This new chain converges to the simple, natural distribution that ReCom was originally designed to approximate: a plan's stationary probability is proportional to the product of the number of spanning trees of each district. This spanning tree score is a measure of district "compactness" (or shape) that is also aligned with notions of community structure from network science. After deriving the steady state formally, we present diagnostic evidence that the convergence is efficient enough for the method to be practically useful, giving high-quality samples for full-sized problems within several hours. In addition to the primary application of benchmarking of redistricting plans (i.e., describing a normal range for statistics), this chain can also be used to validate other methods that target the spanning tree distribution.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Census TopDown: The Impacts of Differential Privacy on Redistricting
Authors:
Aloni Cohen,
Moon Duchin,
JN Matthews,
Bhushan Suwal
Abstract:
The 2020 Decennial Census will be released with a new disclosure avoidance system in place, putting differential privacy in the spotlight for a wide range of data users. We consider several key applications of Census data in redistricting, develo** tools and demonstrations for practitioners who are concerned about the impacts of this new noising algorithm called TopDown. Based on a close look at…
▽ More
The 2020 Decennial Census will be released with a new disclosure avoidance system in place, putting differential privacy in the spotlight for a wide range of data users. We consider several key applications of Census data in redistricting, develo** tools and demonstrations for practitioners who are concerned about the impacts of this new noising algorithm called TopDown. Based on a close look at reconstructed Texas data, we find reassuring evidence that TopDown will not threaten the ability to produce districts with tolerable population balance or to detect signals of racial polarization for Voting Rights Act enforcement.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Measuring Segregation via Analysis on Graphs
Authors:
Moon Duchin,
James M. Murphy,
Thomas Weighill
Abstract:
In this paper, we use analysis on graphs to study quantitative measures of segregation. We focus on a classical statistic from the geography and urban sociology literature known as Moran's I, which in our language is a score associated to a real-valued function on a graph, computed with respect to a spatial weight matrix such as the adjacency matrix associated to the geographic units that tile a c…
▽ More
In this paper, we use analysis on graphs to study quantitative measures of segregation. We focus on a classical statistic from the geography and urban sociology literature known as Moran's I, which in our language is a score associated to a real-valued function on a graph, computed with respect to a spatial weight matrix such as the adjacency matrix associated to the geographic units that tile a city. Our results characterizing the extremal behavior of I illustrate the important role of the underlying graph structure, especially the degree distribution, in interpreting the score. In addition to the standard spatial weight matrices encoding unit adjacency, we consider the Laplacian L and a doubly-stochastic approximation M. These alternatives allow us to connect I to ideas from Fourier analysis and random walks. We offer illustrations of our theoretical results with a mix of stylized synthetic examples and real geographic/demographic data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2022; v1 submitted 20 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Mathematics of Nested Districts: The Case of Alaska
Authors:
Sophia Caldera,
Daryl DeFord,
Moon Duchin,
Samuel C. Gutekunst,
Cara Nix
Abstract:
In eight states, a "nesting rule" requires that each state Senate district be exactly composed of two adjacent state House districts. In this paper we investigate the potential impacts of these nesting rules with a focus on Alaska, where Republicans have a 2/3 majority in the Senate while a Democratic-led coalition controls the House. Treating the current House plan as fixed and considering all po…
▽ More
In eight states, a "nesting rule" requires that each state Senate district be exactly composed of two adjacent state House districts. In this paper we investigate the potential impacts of these nesting rules with a focus on Alaska, where Republicans have a 2/3 majority in the Senate while a Democratic-led coalition controls the House. Treating the current House plan as fixed and considering all possible pairings, we find that the choice of pairings alone can create a swing of 4-5 seats out of 20 against recent voting patterns, which is similar to the range observed when using a Markov chain procedure to generate plans without the nesting constraint. The analysis enables other insights into Alaska districting, including the partisan latitude available to districters with and without strong rules about nesting and contiguity.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
A Computational Approach to Measuring Vote Elasticity and Competitiveness
Authors:
Daryl DeFord,
Moon Duchin,
Justin Solomon
Abstract:
The recent wave of attention to partisan gerrymandering has come with a push to refine or replace the laws that govern political redistricting around the country. A common element in several states' reform efforts has been the inclusion of competitiveness metrics, or scores that evaluate a districting plan based on the extent to which district-level outcomes are in play or are likely to be closely…
▽ More
The recent wave of attention to partisan gerrymandering has come with a push to refine or replace the laws that govern political redistricting around the country. A common element in several states' reform efforts has been the inclusion of competitiveness metrics, or scores that evaluate a districting plan based on the extent to which district-level outcomes are in play or are likely to be closely contested.
In this paper, we examine several classes of competitiveness metrics motivated by recent reform proposals and then evaluate their potential outcomes across large ensembles of districting plans at the Congressional and state Senate levels. This is part of a growing literature using MCMC techniques from applied statistics to situate plans and criteria in the context of valid redistricting alternatives. Our empirical analysis focuses on five states---Utah, Georgia, Wisconsin, Virginia, and Massachusetts---chosen to represent a range of partisan attributes. We highlight situation-specific difficulties in creating good competitiveness metrics and show that optimizing competitiveness can produce unintended consequences on other partisan metrics. These results demonstrate the importance of (1) avoiding writing detailed metric constraints into long-lasting constitutional reform and (2) carrying out careful mathematical modeling on real geo-electoral data in each redistricting cycle.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Recombination: A family of Markov chains for redistricting
Authors:
Daryl DeFord,
Moon Duchin,
Justin Solomon
Abstract:
Redistricting is the problem of partitioning a set of geographical units into a fixed number of districts, subject to a list of often-vague rules and priorities. In recent years, the use of randomized methods to sample from the vast space of districting plans has been gaining traction in courts of law for identifying partisan gerrymanders, and it is now emerging as a possible analytical tool for l…
▽ More
Redistricting is the problem of partitioning a set of geographical units into a fixed number of districts, subject to a list of often-vague rules and priorities. In recent years, the use of randomized methods to sample from the vast space of districting plans has been gaining traction in courts of law for identifying partisan gerrymanders, and it is now emerging as a possible analytical tool for legislatures and independent commissions. In this paper, we set up redistricting as a graph partition problem and introduce a new family of Markov chains called Recombination (or ReCom) on the space of graph partitions. The main point of comparison will be the commonly used Flip walk, which randomly changes the assignment label of a single node at a time. We present evidence that ReCom mixes efficiently, especially in contrast to the slow-mixing Flip, and provide experiments that demonstrate its qualitative behavior. We demonstrate the advantages of ReCom on real-world data and explain both the challenges of the Markov chain approach and the analytical tools that it enables. We close with a short case study involving the Virginia House of Delegates.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
