-
Towards a Theory of Control Architecture: A quantitative framework for layered multi-rate control
Authors:
Nikolai Matni,
Aaron D. Ames,
John C. Doyle
Abstract:
This paper focuses on the need for a rigorous theory of layered control architectures (LCAs) for complex engineered and natural systems, such as power systems, communication networks, autonomous robotics, bacteria, and human sensorimotor control. All deliver extraordinary capabilities, but they lack a coherent theory of analysis and design, partly due to the diverse domains across which LCAs can b…
▽ More
This paper focuses on the need for a rigorous theory of layered control architectures (LCAs) for complex engineered and natural systems, such as power systems, communication networks, autonomous robotics, bacteria, and human sensorimotor control. All deliver extraordinary capabilities, but they lack a coherent theory of analysis and design, partly due to the diverse domains across which LCAs can be found. In contrast, there is a core universal set of control concepts and theory that applies very broadly and accommodates necessary domain-specific specializations. However, control methods are typically used only to design algorithms in components within a larger system designed by others, typically with minimal or no theory. This points towards a need for natural but large extensions of robust performance from control to the full decision and control stack. It is encouraging that the successes of extant architectures from bacteria to the Internet are due to strikingly universal mechanisms and design patterns. This is largely due to convergent evolution by natural selection and not intelligent design, particularly when compared with the sophisticated design of components. Our aim here is to describe the universals of architecture and sketch tentative paths towards a useful design theory.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Diversity-enabled sweet spots in layered architectures and speed-accuracy trade-offs in sensorimotor control
Authors:
Yorie Nakahira,
Quanying Liu,
Terrence J. Sejnowski,
John C. Doyle
Abstract:
Nervous systems sense, communicate, compute and actuate movement using distributed components with severe trade-offs in speed, accuracy, sparsity, noise and saturation. Nevertheless, brains achieve remarkably fast, accurate, and robust control performance due to a highly effective layered control architecture. Here we introduce a driving task to study how a mountain biker mitigates the immediate d…
▽ More
Nervous systems sense, communicate, compute and actuate movement using distributed components with severe trade-offs in speed, accuracy, sparsity, noise and saturation. Nevertheless, brains achieve remarkably fast, accurate, and robust control performance due to a highly effective layered control architecture. Here we introduce a driving task to study how a mountain biker mitigates the immediate disturbance of trail bumps and responds to changes in trail direction. We manipulated the time delays and accuracy of the control input from the wheel as a surrogate for manipulating the characteristics of neurons in the control loop. The observed speed-accuracy trade-offs (SATs) motivated a theoretical framework consisting of layers of control loops with components having diverse speeds and accuracies within each physical level, such as nerve bundles containing axons with a wide range of sizes. Our model explains why the errors from two control loops -- one fast but inaccurate reflexive layer that corrects for bumps, and a planning layer that is slow but accurate -- are additive, and show how the errors in each control loop can be decomposed into the errors caused by the limited speeds and accuracies of the components. These results demonstrate that an appropriate diversity in the properties of neurons across layers helps to create "diversity-enabled sweet spots" (DESSs) so that both fast and accurate control is achieved using slow or inaccurate components.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2021; v1 submitted 18 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Separable and Localized System Level Synthesis for Large-Scale Systems
Authors:
Yuh-Shyang Wang,
Nikolai Matni,
John C. Doyle
Abstract:
A major challenge faced in the design of large-scale cyber-physical systems, such as power systems, the Internet of Things or intelligent transportation systems, is that traditional distributed optimal control methods do not scale gracefully, neither in controller synthesis nor in controller implementation, to systems composed of millions, billions or even trillions of interacting subsystems. This…
▽ More
A major challenge faced in the design of large-scale cyber-physical systems, such as power systems, the Internet of Things or intelligent transportation systems, is that traditional distributed optimal control methods do not scale gracefully, neither in controller synthesis nor in controller implementation, to systems composed of millions, billions or even trillions of interacting subsystems. This paper shows that this challenge can now be addressed by leveraging the recently introduced System Level Approach (SLA) to controller synthesis. In particular, in the context of the SLA, we define suitable notions of separability for control objective functions and system constraints such that the global optimization problem (or iterate update problems of a distributed optimization algorithm) can be decomposed into parallel subproblems. We then further show that if additional locality (i.e., sparsity) constraints are imposed, then these subproblems can be solved using local models and local decision variables. The SLA is essential to maintaining the convexity of the aforementioned problems under locality constraints. As a consequence, the resulting synthesis methods have $O(1)$ complexity relative to the size of the global system. We further show that many optimal control problems of interest, such as (localized) LQR and LQG, $\mathcal{H}_2$ optimal control with joint actuator and sensor regularization, and (localized) mixed $\mathcal{H}_2/\mathcal{L}_1$ optimal control problems, satisfy these notions of separability, and use these problems to explore tradeoffs in performance, actuator and sensing density, and average versus worst-case performance for a large-scale power inspired system.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
-
Towards a Theory of Scale-Free Graphs: Definition, Properties, and Implications (Extended Version)
Authors:
Lun Li,
David Alderson,
Reiko Tanaka,
John C. Doyle,
Walter Willinger
Abstract:
Although the ``scale-free'' literature is large and growing, it gives neither a precise definition of scale-free graphs nor rigorous proofs of many of their claimed properties. In fact, it is easily shown that the existing theory has many inherent contradictions and verifiably false claims. In this paper, we propose a new, mathematically precise, and structural definition of the extent to which…
▽ More
Although the ``scale-free'' literature is large and growing, it gives neither a precise definition of scale-free graphs nor rigorous proofs of many of their claimed properties. In fact, it is easily shown that the existing theory has many inherent contradictions and verifiably false claims. In this paper, we propose a new, mathematically precise, and structural definition of the extent to which a graph is scale-free, and prove a series of results that recover many of the claimed properties while suggesting the potential for a rich and interesting theory. With this definition, scale-free (or its opposite, scale-rich) is closely related to other structural graph properties such as various notions of self-similarity (or respectively, self-dissimilarity). Scale-free graphs are also shown to be the likely outcome of random construction processes, consistent with the heuristic definitions implicit in existing random graph approaches. Our approach clarifies much of the confusion surrounding the sensational qualitative claims in the scale-free literature, and offers rigorous and quantitative alternatives.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2005; v1 submitted 8 January, 2005;
originally announced January 2005.
