-
Data-Driven Invertible Neural Surrogates of Atmospheric Transmission
Authors:
James Koch,
Brenda Forland,
Bruce Bernacki,
Timothy Doster,
Tegan Emerson
Abstract:
We present a framework for inferring an atmospheric transmission profile from a spectral scene. This framework leverages a lightweight, physics-based simulator that is automatically tuned - by virtue of autodifferentiation and differentiable programming - to construct a surrogate atmospheric profile to model the observed data. We demonstrate utility of the methodology by (i) performing atmospheric…
▽ More
We present a framework for inferring an atmospheric transmission profile from a spectral scene. This framework leverages a lightweight, physics-based simulator that is automatically tuned - by virtue of autodifferentiation and differentiable programming - to construct a surrogate atmospheric profile to model the observed data. We demonstrate utility of the methodology by (i) performing atmospheric correction, (ii) recasting spectral data between various modalities (e.g. radiance and reflectance at the surface and at the sensor), and (iii) inferring atmospheric transmission profiles, such as absorbing bands and their relative magnitudes.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
ICML 2023 Topological Deep Learning Challenge : Design and Results
Authors:
Mathilde Papillon,
Mustafa Hajij,
Helen Jenne,
Johan Mathe,
Audun Myers,
Theodore Papamarkou,
Tolga Birdal,
Tamal Dey,
Tim Doster,
Tegan Emerson,
Gurusankar Gopalakrishnan,
Devendra Govil,
Aldo Guzmán-Sáenz,
Henry Kvinge,
Neal Livesay,
Soham Mukherjee,
Shreyas N. Samaga,
Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy,
Maneel Reddy Karri,
Paul Rosen,
Sophia Sanborn,
Robin Walters,
Jens Agerberg,
Sadrodin Barikbin,
Claudio Battiloro
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the computational challenge on topological deep learning that was hosted within the ICML 2023 Workshop on Topology and Geometry in Machine Learning. The competition asked participants to provide open-source implementations of topological neural networks from the literature by contributing to the python packages TopoNetX (data processing) and TopoModelX (deep learning). The chal…
▽ More
This paper presents the computational challenge on topological deep learning that was hosted within the ICML 2023 Workshop on Topology and Geometry in Machine Learning. The competition asked participants to provide open-source implementations of topological neural networks from the literature by contributing to the python packages TopoNetX (data processing) and TopoModelX (deep learning). The challenge attracted twenty-eight qualifying submissions in its two-month duration. This paper describes the design of the challenge and summarizes its main findings.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2024; v1 submitted 26 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Pruning for Sparse Hyperspectral Abundance Prediction
Authors:
Michael G. Rawson,
Timothy Doster
Abstract:
Hyperspectral measurements from long range sensors can give a detailed picture of the items, materials, and chemicals in a scene but analysis can be difficult, slow, and expensive due to high spatial and spectral resolutions of state-of-the-art sensors. As such, sparsity is important to enable the future of spectral compression and analytics. It has been observed that environmental and atmospheric…
▽ More
Hyperspectral measurements from long range sensors can give a detailed picture of the items, materials, and chemicals in a scene but analysis can be difficult, slow, and expensive due to high spatial and spectral resolutions of state-of-the-art sensors. As such, sparsity is important to enable the future of spectral compression and analytics. It has been observed that environmental and atmospheric effects, including scattering, can produce nonlinear effects posing challenges for existing source separation and compression methods. We present a novel transformation into Hilbert spaces for pruning and constructing sparse representations via non-negative least squares minimization. Then we introduce max likelihood compression vectors to decrease information loss. Our approach is benchmarked against standard pruning and least squares as well as deep learning methods. Our methods are evaluated in terms of overall spectral reconstruction error and compression rate using real and synthetic data. We find that pruning least squares methods converge quickly unlike matching pursuit methods. We find that Hilbert space pruning can reduce error by as much as 40% of the error of standard pruning and also outperform neural network autoencoders.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2023; v1 submitted 16 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
How many dimensions are required to find an adversarial example?
Authors:
Charles Godfrey,
Henry Kvinge,
Elise Bishoff,
Myles Mckay,
Davis Brown,
Tim Doster,
Eleanor Byler
Abstract:
Past work exploring adversarial vulnerability have focused on situations where an adversary can perturb all dimensions of model input. On the other hand, a range of recent works consider the case where either (i) an adversary can perturb a limited number of input parameters or (ii) a subset of modalities in a multimodal problem. In both of these cases, adversarial examples are effectively constrai…
▽ More
Past work exploring adversarial vulnerability have focused on situations where an adversary can perturb all dimensions of model input. On the other hand, a range of recent works consider the case where either (i) an adversary can perturb a limited number of input parameters or (ii) a subset of modalities in a multimodal problem. In both of these cases, adversarial examples are effectively constrained to a subspace $V$ in the ambient input space $\mathcal{X}$. Motivated by this, in this work we investigate how adversarial vulnerability depends on $\dim(V)$. In particular, we show that the adversarial success of standard PGD attacks with $\ell^p$ norm constraints behaves like a monotonically increasing function of $ε(\frac{\dim(V)}{\dim \mathcal{X}})^{\frac{1}{q}}$ where $ε$ is the perturbation budget and $\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} =1$, provided $p > 1$ (the case $p=1$ presents additional subtleties which we analyze in some detail). This functional form can be easily derived from a simple toy linear model, and as such our results land further credence to arguments that adversarial examples are endemic to locally linear models on high dimensional spaces.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023; v1 submitted 24 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
In What Ways Are Deep Neural Networks Invariant and How Should We Measure This?
Authors:
Henry Kvinge,
Tegan H. Emerson,
Grayson Jorgenson,
Scott Vasquez,
Timothy Doster,
Jesse D. Lew
Abstract:
It is often said that a deep learning model is "invariant" to some specific type of transformation. However, what is meant by this statement strongly depends on the context in which it is made. In this paper we explore the nature of invariance and equivariance of deep learning models with the goal of better understanding the ways in which they actually capture these concepts on a formal level. We…
▽ More
It is often said that a deep learning model is "invariant" to some specific type of transformation. However, what is meant by this statement strongly depends on the context in which it is made. In this paper we explore the nature of invariance and equivariance of deep learning models with the goal of better understanding the ways in which they actually capture these concepts on a formal level. We introduce a family of invariance and equivariance metrics that allows us to quantify these properties in a way that disentangles them from other metrics such as loss or accuracy. We use our metrics to better understand the two most popular methods used to build invariance into networks: data augmentation and equivariant layers. We draw a range of conclusions about invariance and equivariance in deep learning models, ranging from whether initializing a model with pretrained weights has an effect on a trained model's invariance, to the extent to which invariance learned via training can generalize to out-of-distribution data.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
DNA: Dynamic Network Augmentation
Authors:
Scott Mahan,
Tim Doster,
Henry Kvinge
Abstract:
In many classification problems, we want a classifier that is robust to a range of non-semantic transformations. For example, a human can identify a dog in a picture regardless of the orientation and pose in which it appears. There is substantial evidence that this kind of invariance can significantly improve the accuracy and generalization of machine learning models. A common technique to teach a…
▽ More
In many classification problems, we want a classifier that is robust to a range of non-semantic transformations. For example, a human can identify a dog in a picture regardless of the orientation and pose in which it appears. There is substantial evidence that this kind of invariance can significantly improve the accuracy and generalization of machine learning models. A common technique to teach a model geometric invariances is to augment training data with transformed inputs. However, which invariances are desired for a given classification task is not always known. Determining an effective data augmentation policy can require domain expertise or extensive data pre-processing. Recent efforts like AutoAugment optimize over a parameterized search space of data augmentation policies to automate the augmentation process. While AutoAugment and similar methods achieve state-of-the-art classification accuracy on several common datasets, they are limited to learning one data augmentation policy. Often times different classes or features call for different geometric invariances. We introduce Dynamic Network Augmentation (DNA), which learns input-conditional augmentation policies. Augmentation parameters in our model are outputs of a neural network and are implicitly learned as the network weights are updated. Our model allows for dynamic augmentation policies and performs well on data with geometric transformations conditional on input features.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Reward-Free Attacks in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Ted Fujimoto,
Timothy Doster,
Adam Attarian,
Jill Brandenberger,
Nathan Hodas
Abstract:
We investigate how effective an attacker can be when it only learns from its victim's actions, without access to the victim's reward. In this work, we are motivated by the scenario where the attacker wants to behave strategically when the victim's motivations are unknown. We argue that one heuristic approach an attacker can use is to maximize the entropy of the victim's policy. The policy is gener…
▽ More
We investigate how effective an attacker can be when it only learns from its victim's actions, without access to the victim's reward. In this work, we are motivated by the scenario where the attacker wants to behave strategically when the victim's motivations are unknown. We argue that one heuristic approach an attacker can use is to maximize the entropy of the victim's policy. The policy is generally not obfuscated, which implies it may be extracted simply by passively observing the victim. We provide such a strategy in the form of a reward-free exploration algorithm that maximizes the attacker's entropy during the exploration phase, and then maximizes the victim's empirical entropy during the planning phase. In our experiments, the victim agents are subverted through policy entropy maximization, implying an attacker might not need access to the victim's reward to succeed. Hence, reward-free attacks, which are based only on observing behavior, show the feasibility of an attacker to act strategically without knowledge of the victim's motives even if the victim's reward information is protected.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Rotating spiders and reflecting dogs: a class conditional approach to learning data augmentation distributions
Authors:
Scott Mahan,
Henry Kvinge,
Tim Doster
Abstract:
Building invariance to non-meaningful transformations is essential to building efficient and generalizable machine learning models. In practice, the most common way to learn invariance is through data augmentation. There has been recent interest in the development of methods that learn distributions on augmentation transformations from the training data itself. While such approaches are beneficial…
▽ More
Building invariance to non-meaningful transformations is essential to building efficient and generalizable machine learning models. In practice, the most common way to learn invariance is through data augmentation. There has been recent interest in the development of methods that learn distributions on augmentation transformations from the training data itself. While such approaches are beneficial since they are responsive to the data, they ignore the fact that in many situations the range of transformations to which a model needs to be invariant changes depending on the particular class input belongs to. For example, if a model needs to be able to predict whether an image contains a starfish or a dog, we may want to apply random rotations to starfish images during training (since these do not have a preferred orientation), but we would not want to do this to images of dogs. In this work we introduce a method by which we can learn class conditional distributions on augmentation transformations. We give a number of examples where our methods learn different non-meaningful transformations depending on class and further show how our method can be used as a tool to probe the symmetries intrinsic to a potentially complex dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Argumentative Topology: Finding Loop(holes) in Logic
Authors:
Sarah Tymochko,
Zachary New,
Lucius Bynum,
Emilie Purvine,
Timothy Doster,
Julien Chaput,
Tegan Emerson
Abstract:
Advances in natural language processing have resulted in increased capabilities with respect to multiple tasks. One of the possible causes of the observed performance gains is the introduction of increasingly sophisticated text representations. While many of the new word embedding techniques can be shown to capture particular notions of sentiment or associative structures, we explore the ability o…
▽ More
Advances in natural language processing have resulted in increased capabilities with respect to multiple tasks. One of the possible causes of the observed performance gains is the introduction of increasingly sophisticated text representations. While many of the new word embedding techniques can be shown to capture particular notions of sentiment or associative structures, we explore the ability of two different word embeddings to uncover or capture the notion of logical shape in text. To this end we present a novel framework that we call Topological Word Embeddings which leverages mathematical techniques in dynamical system analysis and data driven shape extraction (i.e. topological data analysis). In this preliminary work we show that using a topological delay embedding we are able to capture and extract a different, shape-based notion of logic aimed at answering the question "Can we find a circle in a circular argument?"
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Gradual DropIn of Layers to Train Very Deep Neural Networks
Authors:
Leslie N. Smith,
Emily M. Hand,
Timothy Doster
Abstract:
We introduce the concept of dynamically growing a neural network during training. In particular, an untrainable deep network starts as a trainable shallow network and newly added layers are slowly, organically added during training, thereby increasing the network's depth. This is accomplished by a new layer, which we call DropIn. The DropIn layer starts by passing the output from a previous layer…
▽ More
We introduce the concept of dynamically growing a neural network during training. In particular, an untrainable deep network starts as a trainable shallow network and newly added layers are slowly, organically added during training, thereby increasing the network's depth. This is accomplished by a new layer, which we call DropIn. The DropIn layer starts by passing the output from a previous layer (effectively skip** over the newly added layers), then increasingly including units from the new layers for both feedforward and backpropagation. We show that deep networks, which are untrainable with conventional methods, will converge with DropIn layers interspersed in the architecture. In addition, we demonstrate that DropIn provides regularization during training in an analogous way as dropout. Experiments are described with the MNIST dataset and various expanded LeNet architectures, CIFAR-10 dataset with its architecture expanded from 3 to 11 layers, and on the ImageNet dataset with the AlexNet architecture expanded to 13 layers and the VGG 16-layer architecture.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
