Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Donovan, T A

On the Value of PHH3 for Mitotic Figure Detection on H&E-stained Images

Authors: Jonathan Ganz, Christian Marzahl, Jonas Ammeling, Barbara Richter, Chloé Puget, Daniela Denk, Elena A. Demeter, Flaviu A. Tabaran, Gabriel Wasinger, Karoline Lipnik, Marco Tecilla, Matthew J. Valentine, Michael J. Dark, Niklas Abele, Pompei Bolfa, Ramona Erber, Robert Klopfleisch, Sophie Merz, Taryn A. Donovan, Samir Jabari, Christof A. Bertram, Katharina Breininger, Marc Aubreville

Abstract: The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. Deep learning algorithms can standardize this task, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label nois… ▽ More The count of mitotic figures (MFs) observed in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides is an important prognostic marker as it is a measure for tumor cell proliferation. However, the identification of MFs has a known low inter-rater agreement. Deep learning algorithms can standardize this task, but they require large amounts of annotated data for training and validation. Furthermore, label noise introduced during the annotation process may impede the algorithm's performance. Unlike H&E, the mitosis-specific antibody phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) specifically highlights MFs. Counting MFs on slides stained against PHH3 leads to higher agreement among raters and has therefore recently been used as a ground truth for the annotation of MFs in H&E. However, as PHH3 facilitates the recognition of cells indistinguishable from H&E stain alone, the use of this ground truth could potentially introduce noise into the H&E-related dataset, impacting model performance. This study analyzes the impact of PHH3-assisted MF annotation on inter-rater reliability and object level agreement through an extensive multi-rater experiment. We found that the annotators' object-level agreement increased when using PHH3-assisted labeling. Subsequently, MF detectors were evaluated on the resulting datasets to investigate the influence of PHH3-assisted labeling on the models' performance. Additionally, a novel dual-stain MF detector was developed to investigate the interpretation-shift of PHH3-assisted labels used in H&E, which clearly outperformed single-stain detectors. However, the PHH3-assisted labels did not have a positive effect on solely H&E-based models. The high performance of our dual-input detector reveals an information mismatch between the H&E and PHH3-stained images as the cause of this effect. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures, 1 Table

Automated Volume Corrected Mitotic Index Calculation Through Annotation-Free Deep Learning using Immunohistochemistry as Reference Standard

Authors: Jonas Ammeling, Moritz Hecker, Jonathan Ganz, Taryn A. Donovan, Christof A. Bertram, Katharina Breininger, Marc Aubreville

Abstract: The volume-corrected mitotic index (M/V-Index) was shown to provide prognostic value in invasive breast carcinomas. However, despite its prognostic significance, it is not established as the standard method for assessing aggressive biological behaviour, due to the high additional workload associated with determining the epithelial proportion. In this work, we show that using a deep learning pipeli… ▽ More The volume-corrected mitotic index (M/V-Index) was shown to provide prognostic value in invasive breast carcinomas. However, despite its prognostic significance, it is not established as the standard method for assessing aggressive biological behaviour, due to the high additional workload associated with determining the epithelial proportion. In this work, we show that using a deep learning pipeline solely trained with an annotation-free, immunohistochemistry-based approach, provides accurate estimations of epithelial segmentation in canine breast carcinomas. We compare our automatic framework with the manually annotated M/V-Index in a study with three board-certified pathologists. Our results indicate that the deep learning-based pipeline shows expert-level performance, while providing time efficiency and reproducibility. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Domain generalization across tumor types, laboratories, and species -- insights from the 2022 edition of the Mitosis Domain Generalization Challenge

Authors: Marc Aubreville, Nikolas Stathonikos, Taryn A. Donovan, Robert Klopfleisch, Jonathan Ganz, Jonas Ammeling, Frauke Wilm, Mitko Veta, Samir Jabari, Markus Eckstein, Jonas Annuscheit, Christian Krumnow, Engin Bozaba, Sercan Cayir, Hongyan Gu, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Mostafa Jahanifar, Adam Shephard, Satoshi Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Sujatha Kotte, VG Saipradeep, Maxime W. Lafarge, Viktor H. Koelzer, Ziyue Wang , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Recognition of mitotic figures in histologic tumor specimens is highly relevant to patient outcome assessment. This task is challenging for algorithms and human experts alike, with deterioration of algorithmic performance under shifts in image representations. Considerable covariate shifts occur when assessment is performed on different tumor types, images are acquired using different digitization… ▽ More Recognition of mitotic figures in histologic tumor specimens is highly relevant to patient outcome assessment. This task is challenging for algorithms and human experts alike, with deterioration of algorithmic performance under shifts in image representations. Considerable covariate shifts occur when assessment is performed on different tumor types, images are acquired using different digitization devices, or specimens are produced in different laboratories. This observation motivated the inception of the 2022 challenge on MItosis Domain Generalization (MIDOG 2022). The challenge provided annotated histologic tumor images from six different domains and evaluated the algorithmic approaches for mitotic figure detection provided by nine challenge participants on ten independent domains. Ground truth for mitotic figure detection was established in two ways: a three-expert consensus and an independent, immunohistochemistry-assisted set of labels. This work represents an overview of the challenge tasks, the algorithmic strategies employed by the participants, and potential factors contributing to their success. With an $F_1$ score of 0.764 for the top-performing team, we summarize that domain generalization across various tumor domains is possible with today's deep learning-based recognition pipelines. However, we also found that domain characteristics not present in the training set (feline as new species, spindle cell shape as new morphology and a new scanner) led to small but significant decreases in performance. When assessed against the immunohistochemistry-assisted reference standard, all methods resulted in reduced recall scores, but with only minor changes in the order of participants in the ranking. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2024; v1 submitted 27 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Journal ref: Medical Image Analysis Volume 94, May 2024, 103155

Nuclear Pleomorphism in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors: Comparison of Reproducibility and Prognostic Relevance between Estimates, Manual Morphometry and Algorithmic Morphometry

Authors: Andreas Haghofer, Eda Parlak, Alexander Bartel, Taryn A. Donovan, Charles-Antoine Assenmacher, Pompei Bolfa, Michael J. Dark, Andrea Fuchs-Baumgartinger, Andrea Klang, Kathrin Jäger, Robert Klopfleisch, Sophie Merz, Barbara Richter, F. Yvonne Schulman, Hannah Janout, Jonathan Ganz, Josef Scharinger, Marc Aubreville, Stephan M. Winkler, Matti Kiupel, Christof A. Bertram

Abstract: Variation in nuclear size and shape is an important criterion of malignancy for many tumor types; however, categorical estimates by pathologists have poor reproducibility. Measurements of nuclear characteristics (morphometry) can improve reproducibility, but manual methods are time consuming. The aim of this study was to explore the limitations of estimates and develop alternative morphometric sol… ▽ More Variation in nuclear size and shape is an important criterion of malignancy for many tumor types; however, categorical estimates by pathologists have poor reproducibility. Measurements of nuclear characteristics (morphometry) can improve reproducibility, but manual methods are time consuming. The aim of this study was to explore the limitations of estimates and develop alternative morphometric solutions for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCT). We assessed the following nuclear evaluation methods for measurement accuracy, reproducibility, and prognostic utility: 1) anisokaryosis (karyomegaly) estimates by 11 pathologists; 2) gold standard manual morphometry of at least 100 nuclei; 3) practicable manual morphometry with stratified sampling of 12 nuclei by 9 pathologists; and 4) automated morphometry using a deep learning-based segmentation algorithm. The study dataset comprised 96 ccMCT with available outcome information. The study dataset comprised 96 ccMCT with available outcome information. Inter-rater reproducibility of karyomegaly estimates was low ($κ$ = 0.226), while it was good (ICC = 0.654) for practicable morphometry of the standard deviation (SD) of nuclear size. As compared to gold standard manual morphometry (AUC = 0.839, 95% CI: 0.701 - 0.977), the prognostic value (tumor-specific survival) of SDs of nuclear area for practicable manual morphometry (12 nuclei) and automated morphometry were high with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.737 - 0.991) and 0.943 (95% CI: 0.889 - 0.996), respectively. This study supports the use of manual morphometry with stratified sampling of 12 nuclei and algorithmic morphometry to overcome the poor reproducibility of estimates. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2024; v1 submitted 26 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Deep Learning-Based Automatic Assessment of AgNOR-scores in Histopathology Images

Authors: Jonathan Ganz, Karoline Lipnik, Jonas Ammeling, Barbara Richter, Chloé Puget, Eda Parlak, Laura Diehl, Robert Klopfleisch, Taryn A. Donovan, Matti Kiupel, Christof A. Bertram, Katharina Breininger, Marc Aubreville

Abstract: Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) are parts of the DNA that are involved in RNA transcription. Due to the silver affinity of associated proteins, argyrophilic NORs (AgNORs) can be visualized using silver-based staining. The average number of AgNORs per nucleus has been shown to be a prognostic factor for predicting the outcome of many tumors. Since manual detection of AgNORs is laborious, automat… ▽ More Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) are parts of the DNA that are involved in RNA transcription. Due to the silver affinity of associated proteins, argyrophilic NORs (AgNORs) can be visualized using silver-based staining. The average number of AgNORs per nucleus has been shown to be a prognostic factor for predicting the outcome of many tumors. Since manual detection of AgNORs is laborious, automation is of high interest. We present a deep learning-based pipeline for automatically determining the AgNOR-score from histopathological sections. An additional annotation experiment was conducted with six pathologists to provide an independent performance evaluation of our approach. Across all raters and images, we found a mean squared error of 0.054 between the AgNOR- scores of the experts and those of the model, indicating that our approach offers performance comparable to humans. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, 1 table

Deep learning-based Subty** of Atypical and Normal Mitoses using a Hierarchical Anchor-Free Object Detector

Authors: Marc Aubreville, Jonathan Ganz, Jonas Ammeling, Taryn A. Donovan, Rutger H. J. Fick, Katharina Breininger, Christof A. Bertram

Abstract: Mitotic activity is key for the assessment of malignancy in many tumors. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the proportion of abnormal mitosis to normal mitosis is of prognostic significance. Atypical mitotic figures (MF) can be identified morphologically as having segregation abnormalities of the chromatids. In this work, we perform, for the first time, automatic subty** of mitotic figures… ▽ More Mitotic activity is key for the assessment of malignancy in many tumors. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the proportion of abnormal mitosis to normal mitosis is of prognostic significance. Atypical mitotic figures (MF) can be identified morphologically as having segregation abnormalities of the chromatids. In this work, we perform, for the first time, automatic subty** of mitotic figures into normal and atypical categories according to characteristic morphological appearances of the different phases of mitosis. Using the publicly available MIDOG21 and TUPAC16 breast cancer mitosis datasets, two experts blindly subtyped mitotic figures into five morphological categories. Further, we set up a state-of-the-art object detection pipeline extending the anchor-free FCOS approach with a gated hierarchical subclassification branch. Our labeling experiment indicated that subty** of mitotic figures is a challenging task and prone to inter-rater disagreement, which we found in 24.89% of MF. Using the more diverse MIDOG21 dataset for training and TUPAC16 for testing, we reached a mean overall average precision score of 0.552, a ROC AUC score of 0.833 for atypical/normal MF and a mean class-averaged ROC-AUC score of 0.977 for discriminating the different phases of cells undergoing mitosis. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables

Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challenge

Authors: Marc Aubreville, Nikolas Stathonikos, Christof A. Bertram, Robert Klopleisch, Natalie ter Hoeve, Francesco Ciompi, Frauke Wilm, Christian Marzahl, Taryn A. Donovan, Andreas Maier, Jack Breen, Nishant Ravikumar, You** Chung, **ah Park, Ramin Nateghi, Fattaneh Pourakpour, Rutger H. J. Fick, Saima Ben Hadj, Mostafa Jahanifar, Nasir Rajpoot, Jakob Dexl, Thomas Wittenberg, Satoshi Kondo, Maxime W. Lafarge, Viktor H. Koelzer , et al. (10 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly… ▽ More The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment than was used for training. One decisive component in the underlying domain shift has been identified as the variability caused by using different whole slide scanners. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge has been to propose and evaluate methods that counter this domain shift and derive scanner-agnostic mitosis detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As a test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were given. The best approaches performed on an expert level, with the winning algorithm yielding an F_1 score of 0.748 (CI95: 0.704-0.781). In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: 19 pages, 9 figures, summary paper of the 2021 MICCAI MIDOG challenge

Journal ref: Medical Image Analysis 84 (2023) 102699

Dataset on Bi- and Multi-Nucleated Tumor Cells in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors

Authors: Christof A. Bertram, Taryn A. Donovan, Marco Tecilla, Florian Bartenschlager, Marco Fragoso, Frauke Wilm, Christian Marzahl, Katharina Breininger, Andreas Maier, Robert Klopfleisch, Marc Aubreville

Abstract: Tumor cells with two nuclei (binucleated cells, BiNC) or more nuclei (multinucleated cells, MuNC) indicate an increased amount of cellular genetic material which is thought to facilitate oncogenesis, tumor progression and treatment resistance. In canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCT), binucleation and multinucleation are parameters used in cytologic and histologic grading schemes (respectively… ▽ More Tumor cells with two nuclei (binucleated cells, BiNC) or more nuclei (multinucleated cells, MuNC) indicate an increased amount of cellular genetic material which is thought to facilitate oncogenesis, tumor progression and treatment resistance. In canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (ccMCT), binucleation and multinucleation are parameters used in cytologic and histologic grading schemes (respectively) which correlate with poor patient outcome. For this study, we created the first open source data-set with 19,983 annotations of BiNC and 1,416 annotations of MuNC in 32 histological whole slide images of ccMCT. Labels were created by a pathologist and an algorithmic-aided labeling approach with expert review of each generated candidate. A state-of-the-art deep learning-based model yielded an $F_1$ score of 0.675 for BiNC and 0.623 for MuNC on 11 test whole slide images. In regions of interest ($2.37 mm^2$) extracted from these test images, 6 pathologists had an object detection performance between 0.270 - 0.526 for BiNC and 0.316 - 0.622 for MuNC, while our model archived an $F_1$ score of 0.667 for BiNC and 0.685 for MuNC. This open dataset can facilitate development of automated image analysis for this task and may thereby help to promote standardization of this facet of histologic tumor prognostication. △ Less

Submitted 5 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Comments: Accepted at BVM workshop 2021

How Many Annotators Do We Need? -- A Study on the Influence of Inter-Observer Variability on the Reliability of Automatic Mitotic Figure Assessment

Authors: Frauke Wilm, Christof A. Bertram, Christian Marzahl, Alexander Bartel, Taryn A. Donovan, Charles-Antoine Assenmacher, Kathrin Becker, Mark Bennett, Sarah Corner, Brieuc Cossic, Daniela Denk, Martina Dettwiler, Beatriz Garcia Gonzalez, Corinne Gurtner, Annika Lehmbecker, Sophie Merz, Stephanie Plog, Anja Schmidt, Rebecca C. Smedley, Marco Tecilla, Tuddow Thaiwong, Katharina Breininger, Matti Kiupel, Andreas Maier, Robert Klopfleisch , et al. (1 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Density of mitotic figures in histologic sections is a prognostically relevant characteristic for many tumours. Due to high inter-pathologist variability, deep learning-based algorithms are a promising solution to improve tumour prognostication. Pathologists are the gold standard for database development, however, labelling errors may hamper development of accurate algorithms. In the present work… ▽ More Density of mitotic figures in histologic sections is a prognostically relevant characteristic for many tumours. Due to high inter-pathologist variability, deep learning-based algorithms are a promising solution to improve tumour prognostication. Pathologists are the gold standard for database development, however, labelling errors may hamper development of accurate algorithms. In the present work we evaluated the benefit of multi-expert consensus (n = 3, 5, 7, 9, 11) on algorithmic performance. While training with individual databases resulted in highly variable F$_1$ scores, performance was notably increased and more consistent when using the consensus of three annotators. Adding more annotators only resulted in minor improvements. We conclude that databases by few pathologists and high label accuracy may be the best compromise between high algorithmic performance and time investment. △ Less

Submitted 8 January, 2021; v1 submitted 4 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Due to data inconsistencies experiments had to be repeated with a reduced number of annotators (17 in version 1). All findings of the previous version were reproducible. 7 pages, 2 figures, accepted at BVM workshop 2021

A completely annotated whole slide image dataset of canine breast cancer to aid human breast cancer research

Authors: Marc Aubreville, Christof A. Bertram, Taryn A. Donovan, Christian Marzahl, Andreas Maier, Robert Klopfleisch

Abstract: Canine mammary carcinoma (CMC) has been used as a model to investigate the pathogenesis of human breast cancer and the same grading scheme is commonly used to assess tumor malignancy in both. One key component of this grading scheme is the density of mitotic figures (MF). Current publicly available datasets on human breast cancer only provide annotations for small subsets of whole slide images (WS… ▽ More Canine mammary carcinoma (CMC) has been used as a model to investigate the pathogenesis of human breast cancer and the same grading scheme is commonly used to assess tumor malignancy in both. One key component of this grading scheme is the density of mitotic figures (MF). Current publicly available datasets on human breast cancer only provide annotations for small subsets of whole slide images (WSIs). We present a novel dataset of 21 WSIs of CMC completely annotated for MF. For this, a pathologist screened all WSIs for potential MF and structures with a similar appearance. A second expert blindly assigned labels, and for non-matching labels, a third expert assigned the final labels. Additionally, we used machine learning to identify previously undetected MF. Finally, we performed representation learning and two-dimensional projection to further increase the consistency of the annotations. Our dataset consists of 13,907 MF and 36,379 hard negatives. We achieved a mean F1-score of 0.791 on the test set and of up to 0.696 on a human breast cancer dataset. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2020; v1 submitted 24 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures

Journal ref: Sci Data 7, 417 (2020)