Classification of Stress via Ambulatory ECG and GSR Data
Authors:
Zachary Dair,
Muhammad Muneeb Saad,
Urja Pawar,
Samantha Dockray,
Ruairi O'Reilly
Abstract:
In healthcare, detecting stress and enabling individuals to monitor their mental health and wellbeing is challenging. Advancements in wearable technology now enable continuous physiological data collection. This data can provide insights into mental health and behavioural states through psychophysiological analysis. However, automated analysis is required to provide timely results due to the quant…
▽ More
In healthcare, detecting stress and enabling individuals to monitor their mental health and wellbeing is challenging. Advancements in wearable technology now enable continuous physiological data collection. This data can provide insights into mental health and behavioural states through psychophysiological analysis. However, automated analysis is required to provide timely results due to the quantity of data collected. Machine learning has shown efficacy in providing an automated classification of physiological data for health applications in controlled laboratory environments. Ambulatory uncontrolled environments, however, provide additional challenges requiring further modelling to overcome. This work empirically assesses several approaches utilising machine learning classifiers to detect stress using physiological data recorded in an ambulatory setting with self-reported stress annotations. A subset of the training portion SMILE dataset enables the evaluation of approaches before submission. The optimal stress detection approach achieves 90.77% classification accuracy, 91.24 F1-Score, 90.42 Sensitivity and 91.08 Specificity, utilising an ExtraTrees classifier and feature imputation methods. Meanwhile, accuracy on the challenge data is much lower at 59.23% (submission #54 from BEaTS-MTU, username ZacDair). The cause of the performance disparity is explored in this work.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023; v1 submitted 19 July, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
Inter and Intra Signal Variance in Feature Extraction and Classification of Affective State
Authors:
Zachary Dair,
Samantha Dockray,
Ruairi O'Reilly
Abstract:
Psychophysiology investigates the causal relationship of physiological changes resulting from psychological states. There are significant challenges with machine learning-based momentary assessments of physiology due to varying data collection methods, physiological differences, data availability and the requirement for expertly annotated data. Advances in wearable technology have significantly in…
▽ More
Psychophysiology investigates the causal relationship of physiological changes resulting from psychological states. There are significant challenges with machine learning-based momentary assessments of physiology due to varying data collection methods, physiological differences, data availability and the requirement for expertly annotated data. Advances in wearable technology have significantly increased the scale, sensitivity and accuracy of devices for recording physiological signals, enabling large-scale unobtrusive physiological data gathering. This work contributes an empirical evaluation of signal variances acquired from wearables and their associated impact on the classification of affective states by (i) assessing differences occurring in features representative of affective states extracted from electrocardiograms and photoplethysmography, (ii) investigating the disparity in feature importance between signals to determine signal-specific features, and (iii) investigating the disparity in feature importance between affective states to determine affect-specific features. Results demonstrate that the degree of feature variance between ECG and PPG in a dataset is reflected in the classification performance of that dataset. Additionally, beats-per-minute, inter-beat-interval and breathing rate are identified as common best-performing features across both signals. Finally, feature variance per-affective state identifies hard-to-distinguish affective states requiring one-versus-rest or additional features to enable accurate classification.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2022; v1 submitted 6 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
