How Spammers and Scammers Leverage AI-Generated Images on Facebook for Audience Growth
Authors:
Renee DiResta,
Josh A. Goldstein
Abstract:
Much of the research and discourse on risks from artificial intelligence (AI) image generators, such as DALL-E and Midjourney, has centered around whether they could be used to inject false information into political discourse. We show that spammers and scammers - seemingly motivated by profit or clout, not ideology - are already using AI-generated images to gain significant traction on Facebook.…
▽ More
Much of the research and discourse on risks from artificial intelligence (AI) image generators, such as DALL-E and Midjourney, has centered around whether they could be used to inject false information into political discourse. We show that spammers and scammers - seemingly motivated by profit or clout, not ideology - are already using AI-generated images to gain significant traction on Facebook. At times, the Facebook Feed is recommending unlabeled AI-generated images to users who neither follow the Pages posting the images nor realize that the images are AI-generated, highlighting the need for improved transparency and provenance standards as AI models proliferate.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Models
Authors:
Isabelle Augenstein,
Timothy Baldwin,
Meeyoung Cha,
Tanmoy Chakraborty,
Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,
David Corney,
Renee DiResta,
Emilio Ferrara,
Scott Hale,
Alon Halevy,
Eduard Hovy,
Heng Ji,
Filippo Menczer,
Ruben Miguez,
Preslav Nakov,
Dietram Scheufele,
Shivam Sharma,
Giovanni Zagni
Abstract:
The emergence of tools based on Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Microsoft's Bing Chat, and Google's Bard, has garnered immense public attention. These incredibly useful, natural-sounding tools mark significant advances in natural language generation, yet they exhibit a propensity to generate false, erroneous, or misleading content -- commonly referred to as "hallucinations.…
▽ More
The emergence of tools based on Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Microsoft's Bing Chat, and Google's Bard, has garnered immense public attention. These incredibly useful, natural-sounding tools mark significant advances in natural language generation, yet they exhibit a propensity to generate false, erroneous, or misleading content -- commonly referred to as "hallucinations." Moreover, LLMs can be exploited for malicious applications, such as generating false but credible-sounding content and profiles at scale. This poses a significant challenge to society in terms of the potential deception of users and the increasing dissemination of inaccurate information. In light of these risks, we explore the kinds of technological innovations, regulatory reforms, and AI literacy initiatives needed from fact-checkers, news organizations, and the broader research and policy communities. By identifying the risks, the imminent threats, and some viable solutions, we seek to shed light on navigating various aspects of veracity in the era of generative AI.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2023; v1 submitted 8 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigations
Authors:
Josh A. Goldstein,
Girish Sastry,
Micah Musser,
Renee DiResta,
Matthew Gentzel,
Katerina Sedova
Abstract:
Generative language models have improved drastically, and can now produce realistic text outputs that are difficult to distinguish from human-written content. For malicious actors, these language models bring the promise of automating the creation of convincing and misleading text for use in influence operations. This report assesses how language models might change influence operations in the fut…
▽ More
Generative language models have improved drastically, and can now produce realistic text outputs that are difficult to distinguish from human-written content. For malicious actors, these language models bring the promise of automating the creation of convincing and misleading text for use in influence operations. This report assesses how language models might change influence operations in the future, and what steps can be taken to mitigate this threat. We lay out possible changes to the actors, behaviors, and content of online influence operations, and provide a framework for stages of the language model-to-influence operations pipeline that mitigations could target (model construction, model access, content dissemination, and belief formation). While no reasonable mitigation can be expected to fully prevent the threat of AI-enabled influence operations, a combination of multiple mitigations may make an important difference.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
