-
A flexured-gimbal 3-axis force-torque sensor reveals minimal cross-axis coupling in an insect-sized flap**-wing robot
Authors:
Aaron Weber,
Daksh Dhingra,
Sawyer B. Fuller
Abstract:
The mechanical complexity of flap** wings, their unsteady aerodynamic flow, and challenge of making measurements at the scale of a sub-gram flap**-wing flying insect robot (FIR) make its behavior hard to predict. Knowing the precise map** from voltage input to torque output, however, can be used to improve their mechanical and flight controller design. To address this challenge, we created a…
▽ More
The mechanical complexity of flap** wings, their unsteady aerodynamic flow, and challenge of making measurements at the scale of a sub-gram flap**-wing flying insect robot (FIR) make its behavior hard to predict. Knowing the precise map** from voltage input to torque output, however, can be used to improve their mechanical and flight controller design. To address this challenge, we created a sensitive force-torque sensor based on a flexured gimbal that only requires a standard motion capture system or accelerometer for readout. Our device precisely and accurately measures pitch and roll torques simultaneously, as well as thrust, on a tethered flap**-wing FIR in response to changing voltage input signals. With it, we were able to measure cross-axis coupling of both torque and thrust input commands on a 180 mg FIR, the UW Robofly. We validated these measurements using free-flight experiments. Our results showed that roll and pitch have maximum cross-axis coupling errors of 8.58% and 17.24%, respectively, relative to the range of torque that is possible. Similarly, varying the pitch and roll commands resulted in up to a 5.78% deviation from the commanded thrust, across the entire commanded torque range. Our system, the first to measure two torque axes simultaneously, shows that torque commands have a negligible cross-axis coupling on both torque and thrust.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Modeling and LQR Control of Insect Sized Flap** Wing Robot
Authors:
Daksh Dhingra,
Kadierdan Kaheman,
Sawyer B. Fuller
Abstract:
Flying insects can perform rapid, sophisticated maneuvers like backflips, sharp banked turns, and in-flight collision recovery. To emulate these in aerial robots weighing less than a gram, known as flying insect robots (FIRs), a fast and responsive control system is essential. To date, these have largely been, at their core, elaborations of proportional-integral-derivative (PID)-type feedback cont…
▽ More
Flying insects can perform rapid, sophisticated maneuvers like backflips, sharp banked turns, and in-flight collision recovery. To emulate these in aerial robots weighing less than a gram, known as flying insect robots (FIRs), a fast and responsive control system is essential. To date, these have largely been, at their core, elaborations of proportional-integral-derivative (PID)-type feedback control. Without exception, their gains have been painstakingly tuned by hand. Aggressive maneuvers have further required task-specific tuning. Optimal control has the potential to mitigate these issues, but has to date only been demonstrated using approxiate models and receding horizon controllers (RHC) that are too computationally demanding to be carried out onboard the robot. Here we used a more accurate stroke-averaged model of forces and torques to implement the first demonstration of optimal control on an FIR that is computationally efficient enough to be performed by a microprocessor carried onboard. We took force and torque measurements from a 150 mg FIR, the UW Robofly, using a custom-built sensitive force-torque sensor, and validated them using motion capture data in free flight. We demonstrated stable hovering (RMS error of about 4 cm) and trajectory tracking maneuvers at translational velocities up to 25 cm/s using an optimal linear quadratic regulator (LQR). These results were enabled by a more accurate model and lay the foundation for future work that uses our improved model and optimal controller in conjunction with recent advances in low-power receding horizon control to perform accurate aggressive maneuvers without iterative, task-specific tuning.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
CRUSH4SQL: Collective Retrieval Using Schema Hallucination For Text2SQL
Authors:
Mayank Kothyari,
Dhruva Dhingra,
Sunita Sarawagi,
Soumen Chakrabarti
Abstract:
Existing Text-to-SQL generators require the entire schema to be encoded with the user text. This is expensive or impractical for large databases with tens of thousands of columns. Standard dense retrieval techniques are inadequate for schema subsetting of a large structured database, where the correct semantics of retrieval demands that we rank sets of schema elements rather than individual elemen…
▽ More
Existing Text-to-SQL generators require the entire schema to be encoded with the user text. This is expensive or impractical for large databases with tens of thousands of columns. Standard dense retrieval techniques are inadequate for schema subsetting of a large structured database, where the correct semantics of retrieval demands that we rank sets of schema elements rather than individual elements. In response, we propose a two-stage process for effective coverage during retrieval. First, we instruct an LLM to hallucinate a minimal DB schema deemed adequate to answer the query. We use the hallucinated schema to retrieve a subset of the actual schema, by composing the results from multiple dense retrievals. Remarkably, hallucination $\unicode{x2013}$ generally considered a nuisance $\unicode{x2013}$ turns out to be actually useful as a bridging mechanism. Since no existing benchmarks exist for schema subsetting on large databases, we introduce three benchmarks. Two semi-synthetic datasets are derived from the union of schemas in two well-known datasets, SPIDER and BIRD, resulting in 4502 and 798 schema elements respectively. A real-life benchmark called SocialDB is sourced from an actual large data warehouse comprising 17844 schema elements. We show that our method1 leads to significantly higher recall than SOTA retrieval-based augmentation methods.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
