Showing 1–37 of 37 results for author: Dhami, D S

Towards Probabilistic Clearance, Explanation and Optimization

Authors: Simon Kohaut, Benedict Flade, Devendra Singh Dhami, Julian Eggert, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Employing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) is an endearing and challenging task. While UAS have the potential to significantly enhance today's logistics and emergency response capabilities, unmanned flying objects above the heads of unprotected pedestrians induce similarly significant safety risks. In this work, we make strides towards improved safety and legal c… ▽ More Employing Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) is an endearing and challenging task. While UAS have the potential to significantly enhance today's logistics and emergency response capabilities, unmanned flying objects above the heads of unprotected pedestrians induce similarly significant safety risks. In this work, we make strides towards improved safety and legal compliance in applying UAS in two ways. First, we demonstrate navigation within the Probabilistic Mission Design (ProMis) framework. To this end, our approach translates Probabilistic Mission Landscapes (PML) into a navigation graph and derives a cost from the probability of complying with all underlying constraints. Second, we introduce the clearance, explanation, and optimization (CEO) cycle on top of ProMis by leveraging the declaratively encoded domain knowledge, legal requirements, and safety assertions to guide the mission design process. Based on inaccurate, crowd-sourced map data and a synthetic scenario, we illustrate the application and utility of our methods in UAS navigation. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

EXPIL: Explanatory Predicate Invention for Learning in Games

Authors: **gyuan Sha, Hikaru Shindo, Quentin Delfosse, Kristian Kersting, Devendra Singh Dhami

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be a powerful tool for training agents that excel in various games. However, the black-box nature of neural network models often hinders our ability to understand the reasoning behind the agent's actions. Recent research has attempted to address this issue by using the guidance of pretrained neural agents to encode logic-based policies, allowing for interp… ▽ More Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven to be a powerful tool for training agents that excel in various games. However, the black-box nature of neural network models often hinders our ability to understand the reasoning behind the agent's actions. Recent research has attempted to address this issue by using the guidance of pretrained neural agents to encode logic-based policies, allowing for interpretable decisions. A drawback of such approaches is the requirement of large amounts of predefined background knowledge in the form of predicates, limiting its applicability and scalability. In this work, we propose a novel approach, Explanatory Predicate Invention for Learning in Games (EXPIL), that identifies and extracts predicates from a pretrained neural agent, later used in the logic-based agents, reducing the dependency on predefined background knowledge. Our experimental evaluation on various games demonstrate the effectiveness of EXPIL in achieving explainable behavior in logic agents while requiring less background knowledge. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: 9 pages, 2 pages references, 8 figures, 3 tables

Mission Design for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles using Hybrid Probabilistic Logic Program

Authors: Simon Kohaut, Benedict Flade, Devendra Singh Dhami, Julian Eggert, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) is a growing field that demands a deep understanding of legal, spatial and temporal concepts in navigation. Hence, any implementation of AAM is forced to deal with the inherent uncertainties of human-inhabited spaces. Enabling growth and innovation requires the creation of a system for safe and robust mission design, i.e., the way we formalize intentions and decide thei… ▽ More Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) is a growing field that demands a deep understanding of legal, spatial and temporal concepts in navigation. Hence, any implementation of AAM is forced to deal with the inherent uncertainties of human-inhabited spaces. Enabling growth and innovation requires the creation of a system for safe and robust mission design, i.e., the way we formalize intentions and decide their execution as trajectories for the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Although legal frameworks have emerged to govern urban air spaces, their full integration into the decision process of autonomous agents and operators remains an open task. In this work we present ProMis, a system architecture for probabilistic mission design. It links the data available from various static and dynamic data sources with legal text and operator requirements by following principles of formal verification and probabilistic modeling. Hereby, ProMis enables the combination of low-level perception and high-level rules in AAM to infer validity over the UAV's state-space. To this end, we employ Hybrid Probabilistic Logic Programs (HPLP) as a unifying, intermediate representation between perception and action-taking. Furthermore, we present methods to connect ProMis with crowd-sourced map data by generating HPLP atoms that represent spatial relations in a probabilistic fashion. Our claims of the utility and generality of ProMis are supported by experiments on a diverse set of scenarios and a discussion of the computational demands associated with probabilistic missions. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

United We Pretrain, Divided We Fail! Representation Learning for Time Series by Pretraining on 75 Datasets at Once

Authors: Maurice Kraus, Felix Divo, David Steinmann, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: In natural language processing and vision, pretraining is utilized to learn effective representations. Unfortunately, the success of pretraining does not easily carry over to time series due to potential mismatch between sources and target. Actually, common belief is that multi-dataset pretraining does not work for time series! Au contraire, we introduce a new self-supervised contrastive pretraini… ▽ More In natural language processing and vision, pretraining is utilized to learn effective representations. Unfortunately, the success of pretraining does not easily carry over to time series due to potential mismatch between sources and target. Actually, common belief is that multi-dataset pretraining does not work for time series! Au contraire, we introduce a new self-supervised contrastive pretraining approach to learn one encoding from many unlabeled and diverse time series datasets, so that the single learned representation can then be reused in several target domains for, say, classification. Specifically, we propose the XD-MixUp interpolation method and the Soft Interpolation Contextual Contrasting (SICC) loss. Empirically, this outperforms both supervised training and other self-supervised pretraining methods when finetuning on low-data regimes. This disproves the common belief: We can actually learn from multiple time series datasets, even from 75 at once. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

DeiSAM: Segment Anything with Deictic Prompting

Authors: Hikaru Shindo, Manuel Brack, Gopika Sudhakaran, Devendra Singh Dhami, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Large-scale, pre-trained neural networks have demonstrated strong capabilities in various tasks, including zero-shot image segmentation. To identify concrete objects in complex scenes, humans instinctively rely on deictic descriptions in natural language, i.e., referring to something depending on the context such as "The object that is on the desk and behind the cup.". However, deep learning appro… ▽ More Large-scale, pre-trained neural networks have demonstrated strong capabilities in various tasks, including zero-shot image segmentation. To identify concrete objects in complex scenes, humans instinctively rely on deictic descriptions in natural language, i.e., referring to something depending on the context such as "The object that is on the desk and behind the cup.". However, deep learning approaches cannot reliably interpret such deictic representations due to their lack of reasoning capabilities in complex scenarios. To remedy this issue, we propose DeiSAM -- a combination of large pre-trained neural networks with differentiable logic reasoners -- for deictic promptable segmentation. Given a complex, textual segmentation description, DeiSAM leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate first-order logic rules and performs differentiable forward reasoning on generated scene graphs. Subsequently, DeiSAM segments objects by matching them to the logically inferred image regions. As part of our evaluation, we propose the Deictic Visual Genome (DeiVG) dataset, containing paired visual input and complex, deictic textual prompts. Our empirical results demonstrate that DeiSAM is a substantial improvement over purely data-driven baselines for deictic promptable segmentation. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Preprint

Pix2Code: Learning to Compose Neural Visual Concepts as Programs

Authors: Antonia Wüst, Wolfgang Stammer, Quentin Delfosse, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: The challenge in learning abstract concepts from images in an unsupervised fashion lies in the required integration of visual perception and generalizable relational reasoning. Moreover, the unsupervised nature of this task makes it necessary for human users to be able to understand a model's learnt concepts and potentially revise false behaviours. To tackle both the generalizability and interpret… ▽ More The challenge in learning abstract concepts from images in an unsupervised fashion lies in the required integration of visual perception and generalizable relational reasoning. Moreover, the unsupervised nature of this task makes it necessary for human users to be able to understand a model's learnt concepts and potentially revise false behaviours. To tackle both the generalizability and interpretability constraints of visual concept learning, we propose Pix2Code, a framework that extends program synthesis to visual relational reasoning by utilizing the abilities of both explicit, compositional symbolic and implicit neural representations. This is achieved by retrieving object representations from images and synthesizing relational concepts as lambda-calculus programs. We evaluate the diverse properties of Pix2Code on the challenging reasoning domains, Kandinsky Patterns and CURI, thereby testing its ability to identify compositional visual concepts that generalize to novel data and concept configurations. Particularly, in stark contrast to neural approaches, we show that Pix2Code's representations remain human interpretable and can be easily revised for improved performance. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Do Not Marginalize Mechanisms, Rather Consolidate!

Authors: Moritz Willig, Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Structural causal models (SCMs) are a powerful tool for understanding the complex causal relationships that underlie many real-world systems. As these systems grow in size, the number of variables and complexity of interactions between them does, too. Thus, becoming convoluted and difficult to analyze. This is particularly true in the context of machine learning and artificial intelligence, where… ▽ More Structural causal models (SCMs) are a powerful tool for understanding the complex causal relationships that underlie many real-world systems. As these systems grow in size, the number of variables and complexity of interactions between them does, too. Thus, becoming convoluted and difficult to analyze. This is particularly true in the context of machine learning and artificial intelligence, where an ever increasing amount of data demands for new methods to simplify and compress large scale SCM. While methods for marginalizing and abstracting SCM already exist today, they may destroy the causality of the marginalized model. To alleviate this, we introduce the concept of consolidating causal mechanisms to transform large-scale SCM while preserving consistent interventional behaviour. We show consolidation is a powerful method for simplifying SCM, discuss reduction of computational complexity and give a perspective on generalizing abilities of consolidated SCM. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 19 pages, 8 figures

Causal Parrots: Large Language Models May Talk Causality But Are Not Causal

Authors: Matej Zečević, Moritz Willig, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Some argue scale is all what is needed to achieve AI, covering even causal models. We make it clear that large language models (LLMs) cannot be causal and give reason onto why sometimes we might feel otherwise. To this end, we define and exemplify a new subgroup of Structural Causal Model (SCM) that we call meta SCM which encode causal facts about other SCM within their variables. We conjecture th… ▽ More Some argue scale is all what is needed to achieve AI, covering even causal models. We make it clear that large language models (LLMs) cannot be causal and give reason onto why sometimes we might feel otherwise. To this end, we define and exemplify a new subgroup of Structural Causal Model (SCM) that we call meta SCM which encode causal facts about other SCM within their variables. We conjecture that in the cases where LLM succeed in doing causal inference, underlying was a respective meta SCM that exposed correlations between causal facts in natural language on whose data the LLM was ultimately trained. If our hypothesis holds true, then this would imply that LLMs are like parrots in that they simply recite the causal knowledge embedded in the data. Our empirical analysis provides favoring evidence that current LLMs are even weak `causal parrots.' △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Published in Transactions in Machine Learning Research (TMLR) (08/2023). Main paper: 17 pages, References: 3 pages, Appendix: 7 pages. Figures: 5 main, 3 appendix. Tables: 3 main

Journal ref: Transactions in Machine Learning Research (08/2023)

Vision Relation Transformer for Unbiased Scene Graph Generation

Authors: Gopika Sudhakaran, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting, Stefan Roth

Abstract: Recent years have seen a growing interest in Scene Graph Generation (SGG), a comprehensive visual scene understanding task that aims to predict entity relationships using a relation encoder-decoder pipeline stacked on top of an object encoder-decoder backbone. Unfortunately, current SGG methods suffer from an information loss regarding the entities local-level cues during the relation encoding pro… ▽ More Recent years have seen a growing interest in Scene Graph Generation (SGG), a comprehensive visual scene understanding task that aims to predict entity relationships using a relation encoder-decoder pipeline stacked on top of an object encoder-decoder backbone. Unfortunately, current SGG methods suffer from an information loss regarding the entities local-level cues during the relation encoding process. To mitigate this, we introduce the Vision rElation TransfOrmer (VETO), consisting of a novel local-level entity relation encoder. We further observe that many existing SGG methods claim to be unbiased, but are still biased towards either head or tail classes. To overcome this bias, we introduce a Mutually Exclusive ExperT (MEET) learning strategy that captures important relation features without bias towards head or tail classes. Experimental results on the VG and GQA datasets demonstrate that VETO + MEET boosts the predictive performance by up to 47 percentage over the state of the art while being 10 times smaller. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Accepted for publication in ICCV 2023

Learning Differentiable Logic Programs for Abstract Visual Reasoning

Authors: Hikaru Shindo, Viktor Pfanschilling, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Visual reasoning is essential for building intelligent agents that understand the world and perform problem-solving beyond perception. Differentiable forward reasoning has been developed to integrate reasoning with gradient-based machine learning paradigms. However, due to the memory intensity, most existing approaches do not bring the best of the expressivity of first-order logic, excluding a cru… ▽ More Visual reasoning is essential for building intelligent agents that understand the world and perform problem-solving beyond perception. Differentiable forward reasoning has been developed to integrate reasoning with gradient-based machine learning paradigms. However, due to the memory intensity, most existing approaches do not bring the best of the expressivity of first-order logic, excluding a crucial ability to solve abstract visual reasoning, where agents need to perform reasoning by using analogies on abstract concepts in different scenarios. To overcome this problem, we propose NEUro-symbolic Message-pAssiNg reasoNer (NEUMANN), which is a graph-based differentiable forward reasoner, passing messages in a memory-efficient manner and handling structured programs with functors. Moreover, we propose a computationally-efficient structure learning algorithm to perform explanatory program induction on complex visual scenes. To evaluate, in addition to conventional visual reasoning tasks, we propose a new task, visual reasoning behind-the-scenes, where agents need to learn abstract programs and then answer queries by imagining scenes that are not observed. We empirically demonstrate that NEUMANN solves visual reasoning tasks efficiently, outperforming neural, symbolic, and neuro-symbolic baselines. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: under review

Scalable Neural-Probabilistic Answer Set Programming

Authors: Arseny Skryagin, Daniel Ochs, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: The goal of combining the robustness of neural networks and the expressiveness of symbolic methods has rekindled the interest in Neuro-Symbolic AI. Deep Probabilistic Programming Languages (DPPLs) have been developed for probabilistic logic programming to be carried out via the probability estimations of deep neural networks. However, recent SOTA DPPL approaches allow only for limited conditional… ▽ More The goal of combining the robustness of neural networks and the expressiveness of symbolic methods has rekindled the interest in Neuro-Symbolic AI. Deep Probabilistic Programming Languages (DPPLs) have been developed for probabilistic logic programming to be carried out via the probability estimations of deep neural networks. However, recent SOTA DPPL approaches allow only for limited conditional probabilistic queries and do not offer the power of true joint probability estimation. In our work, we propose an easy integration of tractable probabilistic inference within a DPPL. To this end, we introduce SLASH, a novel DPPL that consists of Neural-Probabilistic Predicates (NPPs) and a logic program, united via answer set programming (ASP). NPPs are a novel design principle allowing for combining all deep model types and combinations thereof to be represented as a single probabilistic predicate. In this context, we introduce a novel $+/-$ notation for answering various types of probabilistic queries by adjusting the atom notations of a predicate. To scale well, we show how to prune the stochastically insignificant parts of the (ground) program, speeding up reasoning without sacrificing the predictive performance. We evaluate SLASH on a variety of different tasks, including the benchmark task of MNIST addition and Visual Question Answering (VQA). △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 37 pages, 14 figures

V-LoL: A Diagnostic Dataset for Visual Logical Learning

Authors: Lukas Helff, Wolfgang Stammer, Hikaru Shindo, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Despite the successes of recent developments in visual AI, different shortcomings still exist; from missing exact logical reasoning, to abstract generalization abilities, to understanding complex and noisy scenes. Unfortunately, existing benchmarks, were not designed to capture more than a few of these aspects. Whereas deep learning datasets focus on visually complex data but simple visual reasoni… ▽ More Despite the successes of recent developments in visual AI, different shortcomings still exist; from missing exact logical reasoning, to abstract generalization abilities, to understanding complex and noisy scenes. Unfortunately, existing benchmarks, were not designed to capture more than a few of these aspects. Whereas deep learning datasets focus on visually complex data but simple visual reasoning tasks, inductive logic datasets involve complex logical learning tasks, however, lack the visual component. To address this, we propose the visual logical learning dataset, V-LoL, that seamlessly combines visual and logical challenges. Notably, we introduce the first instantiation of V-LoL, V-LoL-Trains, -- a visual rendition of a classic benchmark in symbolic AI, the Michalski train problem. By incorporating intricate visual scenes and flexible logical reasoning tasks within a versatile framework, V-LoL-Trains provides a platform for investigating a wide range of visual logical learning challenges. We evaluate a variety of AI systems including traditional symbolic AI, neural AI, as well as neuro-symbolic AI. Our evaluations demonstrate that even state-of-the-art AI faces difficulties in dealing with visual logical learning challenges, highlighting unique advantages and limitations specific to each methodology. Overall, V-LoL opens up new avenues for understanding and enhancing current abilities in visual logical learning for AI systems. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Pearl Causal Hierarchy on Image Data: Intricacies & Challenges

Authors: Matej Zečević, Moritz Willig, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Many researchers have voiced their support towards Pearl's counterfactual theory of causation as a step** stone for AI/ML research's ultimate goal of intelligent systems. As in any other growing subfield, patience seems to be a virtue since significant progress on integrating notions from both fields takes time, yet, major challenges such as the lack of ground truth benchmarks or a unified persp… ▽ More Many researchers have voiced their support towards Pearl's counterfactual theory of causation as a step** stone for AI/ML research's ultimate goal of intelligent systems. As in any other growing subfield, patience seems to be a virtue since significant progress on integrating notions from both fields takes time, yet, major challenges such as the lack of ground truth benchmarks or a unified perspective on classical problems such as computer vision seem to hinder the momentum of the research movement. This present work exemplifies how the Pearl Causal Hierarchy (PCH) can be understood on image data by providing insights on several intricacies but also challenges that naturally arise when applying key concepts from Pearlian causality to the study of image data. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 9 pages, References: 2 pages. Main paper: 7 figures

Neural Meta-Symbolic Reasoning and Learning

Authors: Zihan Ye, Hikaru Shindo, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Deep neural learning uses an increasing amount of computation and data to solve very specific problems. By stark contrast, human minds solve a wide range of problems using a fixed amount of computation and limited experience. One ability that seems crucial to this kind of general intelligence is meta-reasoning, i.e., our ability to reason about reasoning. To make deep learning do more from less, w… ▽ More Deep neural learning uses an increasing amount of computation and data to solve very specific problems. By stark contrast, human minds solve a wide range of problems using a fixed amount of computation and limited experience. One ability that seems crucial to this kind of general intelligence is meta-reasoning, i.e., our ability to reason about reasoning. To make deep learning do more from less, we propose the first neural meta-symbolic system (NEMESYS) for reasoning and learning: meta programming using differentiable forward-chaining reasoning in first-order logic. Differentiable meta programming naturally allows NEMESYS to reason and learn several tasks efficiently. This is different from performing object-level deep reasoning and learning, which refers in some way to entities external to the system. In contrast, NEMESYS enables self-introspection, lifting from object- to meta-level reasoning and vice versa. In our extensive experiments, we demonstrate that NEMESYS can solve different kinds of tasks by adapting the meta-level programs without modifying the internal reasoning system. Moreover, we show that NEMESYS can learn meta-level programs given examples. This is difficult, if not impossible, for standard differentiable logic programming △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2023; v1 submitted 21 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

LogicRank: Logic Induced Reranking for Generative Text-to-Image Systems

Authors: Björn Deiseroth, Patrick Schramowski, Hikaru Shindo, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Text-to-image models have recently achieved remarkable success with seemingly accurate samples in photo-realistic quality. However as state-of-the-art language models still struggle evaluating precise statements consistently, so do language model based image generation processes. In this work we showcase problems of state-of-the-art text-to-image models like DALL-E with generating accurate samples… ▽ More Text-to-image models have recently achieved remarkable success with seemingly accurate samples in photo-realistic quality. However as state-of-the-art language models still struggle evaluating precise statements consistently, so do language model based image generation processes. In this work we showcase problems of state-of-the-art text-to-image models like DALL-E with generating accurate samples from statements related to the draw bench benchmark. Furthermore we show that CLIP is not able to rerank those generated samples consistently. To this end we propose LogicRank, a neuro-symbolic reasoning framework that can result in a more accurate ranking-system for such precision-demanding settings. LogicRank integrates smoothly into the generation process of text-to-image models and moreover can be used to further fine-tune towards a more logical precise model. △ Less

Submitted 29 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

FEATHERS: Federated Architecture and Hyperparameter Search

Authors: Jonas Seng, Pooja Prasad, Martin Mundt, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Deep neural architectures have profound impact on achieved performance in many of today's AI tasks, yet, their design still heavily relies on human prior knowledge and experience. Neural architecture search (NAS) together with hyperparameter optimization (HO) helps to reduce this dependence. However, state of the art NAS and HO rapidly become infeasible with increasing amount of data being stored… ▽ More Deep neural architectures have profound impact on achieved performance in many of today's AI tasks, yet, their design still heavily relies on human prior knowledge and experience. Neural architecture search (NAS) together with hyperparameter optimization (HO) helps to reduce this dependence. However, state of the art NAS and HO rapidly become infeasible with increasing amount of data being stored in a distributed fashion, typically violating data privacy regulations such as GDPR and CCPA. As a remedy, we introduce FEATHERS - $\textbf{FE}$derated $\textbf{A}$rchi$\textbf{T}$ecture and $\textbf{H}$yp$\textbf{ER}$parameter $\textbf{S}$earch, a method that not only optimizes both neural architectures and optimization-related hyperparameters jointly in distributed data settings, but further adheres to data privacy through the use of differential privacy (DP). We show that FEATHERS efficiently optimizes architectural and optimization-related hyperparameters alike, while demonstrating convergence on classification tasks at no detriment to model performance when complying with privacy constraints. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2023; v1 submitted 24 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 8 pages, References: 2 pages, Supplement: 4.5 pages, Main paper: 3 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm, Supplement: 2 figure, 4 algorithms, extended previous version by Differential Privacy, theoretical results and more experiments. Updated author list as it was incomplete

Can Foundation Models Talk Causality?

Authors: Moritz Willig, Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Foundation models are subject to an ongoing heated debate, leaving open the question of progress towards AGI and dividing the community into two camps: the ones who see the arguably impressive results as evidence to the scaling hypothesis, and the others who are worried about the lack of interpretability and reasoning capabilities. By investigating to which extent causal representations might be c… ▽ More Foundation models are subject to an ongoing heated debate, leaving open the question of progress towards AGI and dividing the community into two camps: the ones who see the arguably impressive results as evidence to the scaling hypothesis, and the others who are worried about the lack of interpretability and reasoning capabilities. By investigating to which extent causal representations might be captured by these large scale language models, we make a humble efforts towards resolving the ongoing philosophical conflicts. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 14 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 6 pages, References: 1.5 pages, Supplement: 11.5 pages. Main paper: 4 figures, Supplement: 3 figures, 8 tables

Attributions Beyond Neural Networks: The Linear Program Case

Authors: Florian Peter Busch, Matej Zečević, Kristian Kersting, Devendra Singh Dhami

Abstract: Linear Programs (LPs) have been one of the building blocks in machine learning and have championed recent strides in differentiable optimizers for learning systems. While there exist solvers for even high-dimensional LPs, understanding said high-dimensional solutions poses an orthogonal and unresolved problem. We introduce an approach where we consider neural encodings for LPs that justify the app… ▽ More Linear Programs (LPs) have been one of the building blocks in machine learning and have championed recent strides in differentiable optimizers for learning systems. While there exist solvers for even high-dimensional LPs, understanding said high-dimensional solutions poses an orthogonal and unresolved problem. We introduce an approach where we consider neural encodings for LPs that justify the application of attribution methods from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) designed for neural learning systems. The several encoding functions we propose take into account aspects such as feasibility of the decision space, the cost attached to each input, or the distance to special points of interest. We investigate the mathematical consequences of several XAI methods on said neural LP encodings. We empirically show that the attribution methods Saliency and LIME reveal indistinguishable results up to perturbation levels, and we propose the property of Directedness as the main discriminative criterion between Saliency and LIME on one hand, and a perturbation-based Feature Permutation approach on the other hand. Directedness indicates whether an attribution method gives feature attributions with respect to an increase of that feature. We further notice the baseline selection problem beyond the classical computer vision setting for Integrated Gradients. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 9.5 pages, References: 2 pages, Supplement: 2.5 pages. Main paper: 5 figures, 2 tables, Supplement: 1 figure

Towards a Solution to Bongard Problems: A Causal Approach

Authors: Salahedine Youssef, Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Even though AI has advanced rapidly in recent years displaying success in solving highly complex problems, the class of Bongard Problems (BPs) yet remain largely unsolved by modern ML techniques. In this paper, we propose a new approach in an attempt to not only solve BPs but also extract meaning out of learned representations. This includes the reformulation of the classical BP into a reinforceme… ▽ More Even though AI has advanced rapidly in recent years displaying success in solving highly complex problems, the class of Bongard Problems (BPs) yet remain largely unsolved by modern ML techniques. In this paper, we propose a new approach in an attempt to not only solve BPs but also extract meaning out of learned representations. This includes the reformulation of the classical BP into a reinforcement learning (RL) setting which will allow the model to gain access to counterfactuals to guide its decisions but also explain its decisions. Since learning meaningful representations in BPs is an essential sub-problem, we further make use of contrastive learning for the extraction of low level features from pixel data. Several experiments have been conducted for analyzing the general BP-RL setup, feature extraction methods and using the best combination for the feature space analysis and its interpretation. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 14 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 12 pages, References: 2 pages, Supplement: 3 pages. Main paper: 9 figures, Supplement: 3 figures

Tearing Apart NOTEARS: Controlling the Graph Prediction via Variance Manipulation

Authors: Jonas Seng, Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Simulations are ubiquitous in machine learning. Especially in graph learning, simulations of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) are being deployed for evaluating new algorithms. In the literature, it was recently argued that continuous-optimization approaches to structure discovery such as NOTEARS might be exploiting the sortability of the variable's variances in the available data due to their use of… ▽ More Simulations are ubiquitous in machine learning. Especially in graph learning, simulations of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) are being deployed for evaluating new algorithms. In the literature, it was recently argued that continuous-optimization approaches to structure discovery such as NOTEARS might be exploiting the sortability of the variable's variances in the available data due to their use of least square losses. Specifically, since structure discovery is a key problem in science and beyond, we want to be invariant to the scale being used for measuring our data (e.g. meter versus centimeter should not affect the causal direction inferred by the algorithm). In this work, we further strengthen this initial, negative empirical suggestion by both proving key results in the multivariate case and corroborating with further empirical evidence. In particular, we show that we can control the resulting graph with our targeted variance attacks, even in the case where we can only partially manipulate the variances of the data. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 5.5 pages, References: 1 page, Supplement: 2 pages. Main paper: 3 figures, Supplement: 1 figure, 1 table

Machines Explaining Linear Programs

Authors: David Steinmann, Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: There has been a recent push in making machine learning models more interpretable so that their performance can be trusted. Although successful, these methods have mostly focused on the deep learning methods while the fundamental optimization methods in machine learning such as linear programs (LP) have been left out. Even if LPs can be considered as whitebox or clearbox models, they are not easy… ▽ More There has been a recent push in making machine learning models more interpretable so that their performance can be trusted. Although successful, these methods have mostly focused on the deep learning methods while the fundamental optimization methods in machine learning such as linear programs (LP) have been left out. Even if LPs can be considered as whitebox or clearbox models, they are not easy to understand in terms of relationships between inputs and outputs. As a linear program only provides the optimal solution to an optimization problem, further explanations are often helpful. In this work, we extend the attribution methods for explaining neural networks to linear programs. These methods explain the model by providing relevance scores for the model inputs, to show the influence of each input on the output. Alongside using classical gradient-based attribution methods we also propose a way to adapt perturbation-based attribution methods to LPs. Our evaluations of several different linear and integer problems showed that attribution methods can generate useful explanations for linear programs. However, we also demonstrate that using a neural attribution method directly might come with some drawbacks, as the properties of these methods on neural networks do not necessarily transfer to linear programs. The methods can also struggle if a linear program has more than one optimal solution, as a solver just returns one possible solution. Our results can hopefully be used as a good starting point for further research in this direction. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 9.5 pages, References: 2.5 pages, Supplement: 6 pages. Main paper: 5 figures, 4 tables, Supplement: 3 figures, 6 tables

Finding Structure and Causality in Linear Programs

Authors: Matej Zečević, Florian Peter Busch, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Linear Programs (LP) are celebrated widely, particularly so in machine learning where they have allowed for effectively solving probabilistic inference tasks or imposing structure on end-to-end learning systems. Their potential might seem depleted but we propose a foundational, causal perspective that reveals intriguing intra- and inter-structure relations for LP components. We conduct a systemati… ▽ More Linear Programs (LP) are celebrated widely, particularly so in machine learning where they have allowed for effectively solving probabilistic inference tasks or imposing structure on end-to-end learning systems. Their potential might seem depleted but we propose a foundational, causal perspective that reveals intriguing intra- and inter-structure relations for LP components. We conduct a systematic, empirical investigation on general-, shortest path- and energy system LPs. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: Main paper: 5 pages, References: 2 pages, Appendix: 1 page. Figures: 8 main, 1 appendix. Tables: 1 appendix

The Causal Loss: Driving Correlation to Imply Causation

Authors: Moritz Willig, Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Most algorithms in classical and contemporary machine learning focus on correlation-based dependence between features to drive performance. Although success has been observed in many relevant problems, these algorithms fail when the underlying causality is inconsistent with the assumed relations. We propose a novel model-agnostic loss function called Causal Loss that improves the interventional qu… ▽ More Most algorithms in classical and contemporary machine learning focus on correlation-based dependence between features to drive performance. Although success has been observed in many relevant problems, these algorithms fail when the underlying causality is inconsistent with the assumed relations. We propose a novel model-agnostic loss function called Causal Loss that improves the interventional quality of the prediction using an intervened neural-causal regularizer. In support of our theoretical results, our experimental illustration shows how causal loss bestows a non-causal associative model (like a standard neural net or decision tree) with interventional capabilities. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Main paper: 8 pages, References: 2 pages, Appendix: 3 pages. Figures: 4 main, 4 appendix. Tables: 2 main

A Taxonomy for Inference in Causal Model Families

Authors: Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Neurally-parameterized Structural Causal Models in the Pearlian notion to causality, referred to as NCM, were recently introduced as a step towards next-generation learning systems. However, said NCM are only concerned with the learning aspect of causal inference but totally miss out on the architecture aspect. That is, actual causal inference within NCM is intractable in that the NCM won't return… ▽ More Neurally-parameterized Structural Causal Models in the Pearlian notion to causality, referred to as NCM, were recently introduced as a step towards next-generation learning systems. However, said NCM are only concerned with the learning aspect of causal inference but totally miss out on the architecture aspect. That is, actual causal inference within NCM is intractable in that the NCM won't return an answer to a query in polynomial time. This insight follows as corollary to the more general statement on the intractability of arbitrary SCM parameterizations, which we prove in this work through classical 3-SAT reduction. Since future learning algorithms will be required to deal with both high dimensional data and highly complex mechanisms governing the data, we ultimately believe work on tractable inference for causality to be decisive. We also show that not all ``causal'' models are created equal. More specifically, there are models capable of answering causal queries that are not SCM, which we refer to as \emph{partially causal models} (PCM). We provide a tabular taxonomy in terms of tractability properties for all of the different model families, namely correlation-based, PCM and SCM. To conclude our work, we also provide some initial ideas on how to overcome parts of the intractability of causal inference with SCM by showing an example of how parameterizing an SCM with SPN modules can at least allow for tractable mechanisms. We hope that our impossibility result alongside the taxonomy for tractability in causal models can raise awareness for this novel research direction since achieving success with causality in real world downstream tasks will not only depend on learning correct models as we also require having the practical ability to gain access to model inferences. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Main paper: 12 pages, References: 3 pages, Appendix: 4 pages. Figures: 3 main, 2 appendix

Neuro-Symbolic Forward Reasoning

Authors: Hikaru Shindo, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Reasoning is an essential part of human intelligence and thus has been a long-standing goal in artificial intelligence research. With the recent success of deep learning, incorporating reasoning with deep learning systems, i.e., neuro-symbolic AI has become a major field of interest. We propose the Neuro-Symbolic Forward Reasoner (NSFR), a new approach for reasoning tasks taking advantage of diffe… ▽ More Reasoning is an essential part of human intelligence and thus has been a long-standing goal in artificial intelligence research. With the recent success of deep learning, incorporating reasoning with deep learning systems, i.e., neuro-symbolic AI has become a major field of interest. We propose the Neuro-Symbolic Forward Reasoner (NSFR), a new approach for reasoning tasks taking advantage of differentiable forward-chaining using first-order logic. The key idea is to combine differentiable forward-chaining reasoning with object-centric (deep) learning. Differentiable forward-chaining reasoning computes logical entailments smoothly, i.e., it deduces new facts from given facts and rules in a differentiable manner. The object-centric learning approach factorizes raw inputs into representations in terms of objects. Thus, it allows us to provide a consistent framework to perform the forward-chaining inference from raw inputs. NSFR factorizes the raw inputs into the object-centric representations, converts them into probabilistic ground atoms, and finally performs differentiable forward-chaining inference using weighted rules for inference. Our comprehensive experimental evaluations on object-centric reasoning data sets, 2D Kandinsky patterns and 3D CLEVR-Hans, and a variety of tasks show the effectiveness and advantage of our approach. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Preprint

SLASH: Embracing Probabilistic Circuits into Neural Answer Set Programming

Authors: Arseny Skryagin, Wolfgang Stammer, Daniel Ochs, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: The goal of combining the robustness of neural networks and the expressivity of symbolic methods has rekindled the interest in neuro-symbolic AI. Recent advancements in neuro-symbolic AI often consider specifically-tailored architectures consisting of disjoint neural and symbolic components, and thus do not exhibit desired gains that can be achieved by integrating them into a unifying framework. W… ▽ More The goal of combining the robustness of neural networks and the expressivity of symbolic methods has rekindled the interest in neuro-symbolic AI. Recent advancements in neuro-symbolic AI often consider specifically-tailored architectures consisting of disjoint neural and symbolic components, and thus do not exhibit desired gains that can be achieved by integrating them into a unifying framework. We introduce SLASH -- a novel deep probabilistic programming language (DPPL). At its core, SLASH consists of Neural-Probabilistic Predicates (NPPs) and logical programs which are united via answer set programming. The probability estimates resulting from NPPs act as the binding element between the logical program and raw input data, thereby allowing SLASH to answer task-dependent logical queries. This allows SLASH to elegantly integrate the symbolic and neural components in a unified framework. We evaluate SLASH on the benchmark data of MNIST addition as well as novel tasks for DPPLs such as missing data prediction and set prediction with state-of-the-art performance, thereby showing the effectiveness and generality of our method. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2021; v1 submitted 7 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures and 6 tables

ACM Class: I.2.5; D.3.2

Causal Explanations of Structural Causal Models

Authors: Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Constantin A. Rothkopf, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: In explanatory interactive learning (XIL) the user queries the learner, then the learner explains its answer to the user and finally the loop repeats. XIL is attractive for two reasons, (1) the learner becomes better and (2) the user's trust increases. For both reasons to hold, the learner's explanations must be useful to the user and the user must be allowed to ask useful questions. Ideally, both… ▽ More In explanatory interactive learning (XIL) the user queries the learner, then the learner explains its answer to the user and finally the loop repeats. XIL is attractive for two reasons, (1) the learner becomes better and (2) the user's trust increases. For both reasons to hold, the learner's explanations must be useful to the user and the user must be allowed to ask useful questions. Ideally, both questions and explanations should be grounded in a causal model since they avoid spurious fallacies. Ultimately, we seem to seek a causal variant of XIL. The question part on the user's end we believe to be solved since the user's mental model can provide the causal model. But how would the learner provide causal explanations? In this work we show that existing explanation methods are not guaranteed to be causal even when provided with a Structural Causal Model (SCM). Specifically, we use the popular, proclaimed causal explanation method CXPlain to illustrate how the generated explanations leave open the question of truly causal explanations. Thus as a step towards causal XIL, we propose a solution to the lack of causal explanations. We solve this problem by deriving from first principles an explanation method that makes full use of a given SCM, which we refer to as SC$\textbf{E}$ ($\textbf{E}$ standing for explanation). Since SCEs make use of structural information, any causal graph learner can now provide human-readable explanations. We conduct several experiments including a user study with 22 participants to investigate the virtue of SCE as causal explanations of SCMs. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 5 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Main paper: 9 pages, References: 2.5 pages, Supplement: 12 pages. Main paper: 4 figures, Supplement: 6 figures, 2 tables

Sum-Product-Attention Networks: Leveraging Self-Attention in Probabilistic Circuits

Authors: Zhongjie Yu, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Probabilistic circuits (PCs) have become the de-facto standard for learning and inference in probabilistic modeling. We introduce Sum-Product-Attention Networks (SPAN), a new generative model that integrates probabilistic circuits with Transformers. SPAN uses self-attention to select the most relevant parts of a probabilistic circuit, here sum-product networks, to improve the modeling capability o… ▽ More Probabilistic circuits (PCs) have become the de-facto standard for learning and inference in probabilistic modeling. We introduce Sum-Product-Attention Networks (SPAN), a new generative model that integrates probabilistic circuits with Transformers. SPAN uses self-attention to select the most relevant parts of a probabilistic circuit, here sum-product networks, to improve the modeling capability of the underlying sum-product network. We show that while modeling, SPAN focuses on a specific set of independent assumptions in every product layer of the sum-product network. Our empirical evaluations show that SPAN outperforms state-of-the-art probabilistic generative models on various benchmark data sets as well is an efficient generative image model. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Relating Graph Neural Networks to Structural Causal Models

Authors: Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Petar Veličković, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: Causality can be described in terms of a structural causal model (SCM) that carries information on the variables of interest and their mechanistic relations. For most processes of interest the underlying SCM will only be partially observable, thus causal inference tries leveraging the exposed. Graph neural networks (GNN) as universal approximators on structured input pose a viable candidate for ca… ▽ More Causality can be described in terms of a structural causal model (SCM) that carries information on the variables of interest and their mechanistic relations. For most processes of interest the underlying SCM will only be partially observable, thus causal inference tries leveraging the exposed. Graph neural networks (GNN) as universal approximators on structured input pose a viable candidate for causal learning, suggesting a tighter integration with SCM. To this effect we present a theoretical analysis from first principles that establishes a more general view on neural-causal models, revealing several novel connections between GNN and SCM. We establish a new model class for GNN-based causal inference that is necessary and sufficient for causal effect identification. Our empirical illustration on simulations and standard benchmarks validate our theoretical proofs. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2021; v1 submitted 9 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: Main paper: 12 pages, References: 2 pages, Appendix: 13 pages; Main paper: 4 figures, Appendix: 2 figures

Structural Causal Models Reveal Confounder Bias in Linear Program Modelling

Authors: Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: The recent years have been marked by extended research on adversarial attacks, especially on deep neural networks. With this work we intend on posing and investigating the question of whether the phenomenon might be more general in nature, that is, adversarial-style attacks outside classical classification tasks. Specifically, we investigate optimization problems as they constitute a fundamental p… ▽ More The recent years have been marked by extended research on adversarial attacks, especially on deep neural networks. With this work we intend on posing and investigating the question of whether the phenomenon might be more general in nature, that is, adversarial-style attacks outside classical classification tasks. Specifically, we investigate optimization problems as they constitute a fundamental part of modern AI research. To this end, we consider the base class of optimizers namely Linear Programs (LPs). On our initial attempt of a naïve map** between the formalism of adversarial examples and LPs, we quickly identify the key ingredients missing for making sense of a reasonable notion of adversarial examples for LPs. Intriguingly, the formalism of Pearl's notion to causality allows for the right description of adversarial like examples for LPs. Characteristically, we show the direct influence of the Structural Causal Model (SCM) onto the subsequent LP optimization, which ultimately exposes a notion of confounding in LPs (inherited by said SCM) that allows for adversarial-style attacks. We provide both the general proof formally alongside existential proofs of such intriguing LP-parameterizations based on SCM for three combinatorial problems, namely Linear Assignment, Shortest Path and a real world problem of energy systems. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: Published at the 15th Asian Conference on Machine Learning (ACML 2023) Journal Track. Main paper: 19 pages, References: 2 pages, Supplement: .5 page. Main paper: 3 figures, 3 tables, Supplement: 1 table

Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions from Heterogeneous Data: An Embedding Approach

Authors: Devendra Singh Dhami, Siwen Yan, Gautam Kunapuli, David Page, Sriraam Natarajan

Abstract: Predicting and discovering drug-drug interactions (DDIs) using machine learning has been studied extensively. However, most of the approaches have focused on text data or textual representation of the drug structures. We present the first work that uses multiple data sources such as drug structure images, drug structure string representation and relational representation of drug relationships as t… ▽ More Predicting and discovering drug-drug interactions (DDIs) using machine learning has been studied extensively. However, most of the approaches have focused on text data or textual representation of the drug structures. We present the first work that uses multiple data sources such as drug structure images, drug structure string representation and relational representation of drug relationships as the input. To this effect, we exploit the recent advances in deep networks to integrate these varied sources of inputs in predicting DDIs. Our empirical evaluation against several state-of-the-art methods using standalone different data types for drugs clearly demonstrate the efficacy of combining heterogeneous data in predicting DDIs. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures, Accepted as a short paper to 'Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2021'

Interventional Sum-Product Networks: Causal Inference with Tractable Probabilistic Models

Authors: Matej Zečević, Devendra Singh Dhami, Athresh Karanam, Sriraam Natarajan, Kristian Kersting

Abstract: While probabilistic models are an important tool for studying causality, doing so suffers from the intractability of inference. As a step towards tractable causal models, we consider the problem of learning interventional distributions using sum-product networks (SPNs) that are over-parameterized by gate functions, e.g., neural networks. Providing an arbitrarily intervened causal graph as input, e… ▽ More While probabilistic models are an important tool for studying causality, doing so suffers from the intractability of inference. As a step towards tractable causal models, we consider the problem of learning interventional distributions using sum-product networks (SPNs) that are over-parameterized by gate functions, e.g., neural networks. Providing an arbitrarily intervened causal graph as input, effectively subsuming Pearl's do-operator, the gate function predicts the parameters of the SPN. The resulting interventional SPNs are motivated and illustrated by a structural causal model themed around personal health. Our empirical evaluation on three benchmark data sets as well as a synthetic health data set clearly demonstrates that interventional SPNs indeed are both expressive in modelling and flexible in adapting to the interventions. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2021; v1 submitted 20 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Main paper: 10 pages, References: 3 pages, Appendix: 8 pages. Main paper: 6 figures, Appendix: 5 figures

A Statistical Relational Approach to Learning Distance-based GCNs

Authors: Devendra Singh Dhami, Siwen Yan, Sriraam Natarajan

Abstract: We consider the problem of learning distance-based Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) for relational data. Specifically, we first embed the original graph into the Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^m$ using a relational density estimation technique thereby constructing a secondary Euclidean graph. The graph vertices correspond to the target triples and edges denote the Euclidean distances between the t… ▽ More We consider the problem of learning distance-based Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) for relational data. Specifically, we first embed the original graph into the Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^m$ using a relational density estimation technique thereby constructing a secondary Euclidean graph. The graph vertices correspond to the target triples and edges denote the Euclidean distances between the target triples. We emphasize the importance of learning the secondary Euclidean graph and the advantages of employing a distance matrix over the typically used adjacency matrix. Our comprehensive empirical evaluation demonstrates the superiority of our approach over $12$ different GCN models, relational embedding techniques and rule learning techniques. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2021; v1 submitted 13 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables; accepted to STARAI workshop

Non-Parametric Learning of Gaifman Models

Authors: Devendra Singh Dhami, Siwen Yan, Gautam Kunapuli, Sriraam Natarajan

Abstract: We consider the problem of structure learning for Gaifman models and learn relational features that can be used to derive feature representations from a knowledge base. These relational features are first-order rules that are then partially grounded and counted over local neighborhoods of a Gaifman model to obtain the feature representations. We propose a method for learning these relational featu… ▽ More We consider the problem of structure learning for Gaifman models and learn relational features that can be used to derive feature representations from a knowledge base. These relational features are first-order rules that are then partially grounded and counted over local neighborhoods of a Gaifman model to obtain the feature representations. We propose a method for learning these relational features for a Gaifman model by using relational tree distances. Our empirical evaluation on real data sets demonstrates the superiority of our approach over classical rule-learning. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2020; v1 submitted 2 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: 8 pages, 6 figures

Beyond Textual Data: Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions from Molecular Structure Images using Siamese Neural Networks

Authors: Devendra Singh Dhami, Siwen Yan, Gautam Kunapuli, David Page, Sriraam Natarajan

Abstract: Predicting and discovering drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is an important problem and has been studied extensively both from medical and machine learning point of view. Almost all of the machine learning approaches have focused on text data or textual representation of the structural data of drugs. We present the first work that uses drug structure images as the input and utilizes a Siamese convolu… ▽ More Predicting and discovering drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is an important problem and has been studied extensively both from medical and machine learning point of view. Almost all of the machine learning approaches have focused on text data or textual representation of the structural data of drugs. We present the first work that uses drug structure images as the input and utilizes a Siamese convolutional network architecture to predict DDIs. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2020; v1 submitted 14 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 9 pages, 9 figures

Knowledge-augmented Column Networks: Guiding Deep Learning with Advice

Authors: Mayukh Das, Devendra Singh Dhami, Yang Yu, Gautam Kunapuli, Sriraam Natarajan

Abstract: Recently, deep models have had considerable success in several tasks, especially with low-level representations. However, effective learning from sparse noisy samples is a major challenge in most deep models, especially in domains with structured representations. Inspired by the proven success of human guided machine learning, we propose Knowledge-augmented Column Networks, a relational deep learn… ▽ More Recently, deep models have had considerable success in several tasks, especially with low-level representations. However, effective learning from sparse noisy samples is a major challenge in most deep models, especially in domains with structured representations. Inspired by the proven success of human guided machine learning, we propose Knowledge-augmented Column Networks, a relational deep learning framework that leverages human advice/knowledge to learn better models in presence of sparsity and systematic noise. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: Presented at 2019 ICML Workshop on Human in the Loop Learning (HILL 2019), Long Beach, USA. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1904.06950

Human-Guided Learning of Column Networks: Augmenting Deep Learning with Advice

Authors: Mayukh Das, Yang Yu, Devendra Singh Dhami, Gautam Kunapuli, Sriraam Natarajan

Abstract: Recently, deep models have been successfully applied in several applications, especially with low-level representations. However, sparse, noisy samples and structured domains (with multiple objects and interactions) are some of the open challenges in most deep models. Column Networks, a deep architecture, can succinctly capture such domain structure and interactions, but may still be prone to sub-… ▽ More Recently, deep models have been successfully applied in several applications, especially with low-level representations. However, sparse, noisy samples and structured domains (with multiple objects and interactions) are some of the open challenges in most deep models. Column Networks, a deep architecture, can succinctly capture such domain structure and interactions, but may still be prone to sub-optimal learning from sparse and noisy samples. Inspired by the success of human-advice guided learning in AI, especially in data-scarce domains, we propose Knowledge-augmented Column Networks that leverage human advice/knowledge for better learning with noisy/sparse samples. Our experiments demonstrate that our approach leads to either superior overall performance or faster convergence (i.e., both effective and efficient). △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: Under Review at 'Machine Learning Journal' (MLJ)