Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Deppert, M

A $(3/2 + \varepsilon)$-Approximation for Multiple TSP with a Variable Number of Depots

Authors: Max Deppert, Matthias Kaul, Matthias Mnich

Abstract: One of the most studied extensions of the famous Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) is the {\sc Multiple TSP}: a set of $m\geq 1$ salespersons collectively traverses a set of $n$ cities by $m$ non-trivial tours, to minimize the total length of their tours. This problem can also be considered to be a variant of {\sc Uncapacitated Vehicle Routing} where the objective function is the sum of all to… ▽ More One of the most studied extensions of the famous Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) is the {\sc Multiple TSP}: a set of $m\geq 1$ salespersons collectively traverses a set of $n$ cities by $m$ non-trivial tours, to minimize the total length of their tours. This problem can also be considered to be a variant of {\sc Uncapacitated Vehicle Routing} where the objective function is the sum of all tour lengths. When all $m$ tours start from a single common \emph{depot} $v_0$, then the metric {\sc Multiple TSP} can be approximated equally well as the standard metric TSP, as shown by Frieze (1983). The {\sc Multiple TSP} becomes significantly harder to approximate when there is a \emph{set} $D$ of $d \geq 1$ depots that form the starting and end points of the $m$ tours. For this case only a $(2-1/d)$-approximation in polynomial time is known, as well as a $3/2$-approximation for \emph{constant} $d$ which requires a prohibitive run time of $n^{Θ(d)}$ (Xu and Rodrigues, \emph{INFORMS J. Comput.}, 2015). A recent work of Traub, Vygen and Zenklusen (STOC 2020) gives another approximation algorithm for {\sc Multiple TSP} running in time $n^{Θ(d)}$ and reducing the problem to approximating TSP. In this paper we overcome the $n^{Θ(d)}$ time barrier: we give the first efficient approximation algorithm for {\sc Multiple TSP} with a \emph{variable} number $d$ of depots that yields a better-than-2 approximation. Our algorithm runs in time $(1/\varepsilon)^{\mathcal O(d\log d)}\cdot n^{\mathcal O(1)}$, and produces a $(3/2+\varepsilon)$-approximation with constant probability. For the graphic case, we obtain a deterministic $3/2$-approximation in time $2^d\cdot n^{\mathcal O(1)}$.ithm for metric {\sc Multiple TSP} with run time $n^{Θ(d)}$, which reduces the problem to approximating metric TSP. △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: To be published at ESA 2023

The Power of Duality: Response Time Analysis meets Integer Programming

Authors: Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen

Abstract: We study a mutually enriching connection between response time analysis in real-time systems and the mixing set problem. Thereby generalizing over known results we present a new approach to the computation of response times in fixed-priority uniprocessor real-time scheduling. We even allow that the tasks are delayed by some period-constrained release jitter. By studying a dual problem formulation… ▽ More We study a mutually enriching connection between response time analysis in real-time systems and the mixing set problem. Thereby generalizing over known results we present a new approach to the computation of response times in fixed-priority uniprocessor real-time scheduling. We even allow that the tasks are delayed by some period-constrained release jitter. By studying a dual problem formulation of the decision problem as an integer linear program we show that worst-case response times can be computed by algorithmically exploiting a conditional reduction to an instance of the mixing set problem. In the important case of harmonic periods our new technique admits a near-quadratic algorithm to the exact computation of worst-case response times. We show that generally, a smaller utilization leads to more efficient algorithms even in fixed-priority scheduling. Worst-case response times can be understood as least fixed points to non-trivial fixed point equations and as such, our approach may also be used to solve suitable fixed point problems. Furthermore, we show that our technique can be reversed to solve the mixing set problem by computing worst-case response times to associated real-time scheduling task systems. Finally, we also apply our optimization technique to solve 4-block integer programs with simple objective functions. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 5 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Scheduling with Many Shared Resources

Authors: Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen, Marten Maack, Simon Pukrop, Malin Rau

Abstract: Consider the many shared resource scheduling problem where jobs have to be scheduled on identical parallel machines with the goal of minimizing the makespan. However, each job needs exactly one additional shared resource in order to be executed and hence prevents the execution of jobs that need the same resource while being processed. Previously a $(2m/(m+1))$-approximation was the best known resu… ▽ More Consider the many shared resource scheduling problem where jobs have to be scheduled on identical parallel machines with the goal of minimizing the makespan. However, each job needs exactly one additional shared resource in order to be executed and hence prevents the execution of jobs that need the same resource while being processed. Previously a $(2m/(m+1))$-approximation was the best known result for this problem. Furthermore, a $6/5$-approximation for the case with only two machines was known as well as a PTAS for the case with a constant number of machines. We present a simple and fast 5/3-approximation and a much more involved but still reasonable 1.5-approximation. Furthermore, we provide a PTAS for the case with only a constant number of machines, which is arguably simpler and faster than the previously known one, as well as a PTAS with resource augmentation for the general case. The approximation schemes make use of the N-fold integer programming machinery, which has found more and more applications in the field of scheduling recently. It is plausible that the latter results can be improved and extended to more general cases. Lastly, we give a $5/4 - \varepsilon$ inapproximability result for the natural problem extension where each job may need up to a constant number (in particular $3$) of different resources. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Load Balancing: The Long Road from Theory to Practice

Authors: Sebastian Berndt, Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen, Lars Rohwedder

Abstract: There is a long history of approximation schemes for the problem of scheduling jobs on identical machines to minimize the makespan. Such a scheme grants a $(1+ε)$-approximation solution for every $ε> 0$, but the running time grows exponentially in $1/ε$. For a long time, these schemes seemed like a purely theoretical concept. Even solving instances for moderate values of $ε$ seemed completely illu… ▽ More There is a long history of approximation schemes for the problem of scheduling jobs on identical machines to minimize the makespan. Such a scheme grants a $(1+ε)$-approximation solution for every $ε> 0$, but the running time grows exponentially in $1/ε$. For a long time, these schemes seemed like a purely theoretical concept. Even solving instances for moderate values of $ε$ seemed completely illusional. In an effort to bridge theory and practice, we refine recent ILP techniques to develop the fastest known approximation scheme for this problem. An implementation of this algorithm reaches values of $ε$ lower than $2/11\approx 18.2\%$ within a reasonable timespan. This is the approximation guarantee of MULTIFIT, which, to the best of our knowledge, has the best proven guarantee of any non-scheme algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 28 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Peak Demand Minimization via Sliced Strip Packing

Authors: Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen, Arindam Khan, Malin Rau, Malte Tutas

Abstract: We study Nonpreemptive Peak Demand Minimization (NPDM) problem, where we are given a set of jobs, specified by their processing times and energy requirements. The goal is to schedule all jobs within a fixed time period such that the peak load (the maximum total energy requirement at any time) is minimized. This problem has recently received significant attention due to its relevance in smart-grids… ▽ More We study Nonpreemptive Peak Demand Minimization (NPDM) problem, where we are given a set of jobs, specified by their processing times and energy requirements. The goal is to schedule all jobs within a fixed time period such that the peak load (the maximum total energy requirement at any time) is minimized. This problem has recently received significant attention due to its relevance in smart-grids. Theoretically, the problem is related to the classical strip packing problem (SP). In SP, a given set of axis-aligned rectangles must be packed into a fixed-width strip, such that the height of the strip is minimized. NPDM can be modeled as strip packing with slicing and stacking constraint: each rectangle may be cut vertically into multiple slices and the slices may be packed into the strip as individual pieces. The stacking constraint forbids solutions where two slices of the same rectangle are intersected by the same vertical line. Nonpreemption enforces the slices to be placed in contiguous horizontal locations (but may be placed at different vertical locations). We obtain a $(5/3+ε)$-approximation algorithm for the problem. We also provide an asymptotic efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (AEPTAS) which generates a schedule for almost all jobs with energy consumption $(1+ε)OPT$. The remaining jobs fit into a thin container of height $1$. The previous best for NPDM was 2.7 approximation based on FFDH [Ranjan et al. 2015]. One of our key ideas is providing several new lower bounds on the optimal solution of a geometric packing, which could be useful in other related problems. These lower bounds help us to obtain approximative solutions based on Steinberg's algorithm in many cases. In addition, we show how to split schedules generated by the AEPTAS into few segments and to rearrange the corresponding jobs to insert the thin container mentioned above. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: 24 pages

Fuzzy Simultaneous Congruences

Authors: Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen, Kim-Manuel Klein

Abstract: We introduce a very natural generalization of the well-known problem of simultaneous congruences. Instead of searching for a positive integer $s$ that is specified by $n$ fixed remainders modulo integer divisors $a_1,\dots,a_n$ we consider remainder intervals $R_1,\dots,R_n$ such that $s$ is feasible if and only if $s$ is congruent to $r_i$ modulo $a_i$ for some remainder $r_i$ in interval $R_i$ f… ▽ More We introduce a very natural generalization of the well-known problem of simultaneous congruences. Instead of searching for a positive integer $s$ that is specified by $n$ fixed remainders modulo integer divisors $a_1,\dots,a_n$ we consider remainder intervals $R_1,\dots,R_n$ such that $s$ is feasible if and only if $s$ is congruent to $r_i$ modulo $a_i$ for some remainder $r_i$ in interval $R_i$ for all $i$. This problem is a special case of a 2-stage integer program with only two variables per constraint which is is closely related to directed Diophantine approximation as well as the mixing set problem. We give a hardness result showing that the problem is NP-hard in general. By investigating the case of harmonic divisors, i.e. $a_{i+1}/a_i$ is an integer for all $i<n$, which was heavily studied for the mixing set problem as well, we also answer a recent algorithmic question from the field of real-time systems. We present an algorithm to decide the feasibility of an instance in time $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ and we show that if it exists even the smallest feasible solution can be computed in strongly polynomial time $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2020; v1 submitted 18 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Near-Linear Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling Problems with Batch Setup Times

Authors: Max A. Deppert, Klaus Jansen

Abstract: We investigate the scheduling of $n$ jobs divided into $c$ classes on $m$ identical parallel machines. For every class there is a setup time which is required whenever a machine switches from the processing of one class to another class. The objective is to find a schedule that minimizes the makespan. We give near-linear approximation algorithms for the following problem variants: the non-preempti… ▽ More We investigate the scheduling of $n$ jobs divided into $c$ classes on $m$ identical parallel machines. For every class there is a setup time which is required whenever a machine switches from the processing of one class to another class. The objective is to find a schedule that minimizes the makespan. We give near-linear approximation algorithms for the following problem variants: the non-preemptive context where jobs may not be preempted, the preemptive context where jobs may be preempted but not parallelized, as well as the splittable context where jobs may be preempted and parallelized. We present the first algorithm improving the previously best approximation ratio of $2$ to a better ratio of $3/2$ in the preemptive case. In more detail, for all three flavors we present an approximation ratio $2$ with running time $\mathcal{O}(n)$, ratio $3/2+\varepsilon$ in time $\mathcal{O}(n\log 1/\varepsilon)$ as well as a ratio of $3/2$. The $(3/2)$-approximate algorithms have different running times. In the non-preemptive case we get time $\mathcal{O}(n\log (n+Δ))$ where $Δ$ is the largest value of the input. The splittable approximation runs in time $\mathcal{O}(n+c\log(c+m))$ whereas the preemptive algorithm has a running time $\mathcal{O}(n \log (c+m)) \leq \mathcal{O}(n \log n)$. So far, no PTAS is known for the preemptive problem without restrictions, so we make progress towards that question. Recently Jansen et al. found an EPTAS for the splittable and non-preemptive case but with impractical running times exponential in $1/\varepsilon$. △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2019; v1 submitted 2 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.