-
Automatic Voice Classification Of Autistic Subjects
Authors:
Jessica Vacca,
Natascia Brondino,
Fabio Dell'Acqua,
Anna Vizziello,
Pietro Savazzi
Abstract:
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) describe a heterogeneous set of conditions classified as neurodevelopmental disorders. Although the mechanisms underlying ASD are not yet fully understood, more recent literature focused on multiple genetics and/or environmental risk factors. Heterogeneity of symptoms, especially in milder forms of this condition, could be a challenge for the clinician. In this work…
▽ More
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) describe a heterogeneous set of conditions classified as neurodevelopmental disorders. Although the mechanisms underlying ASD are not yet fully understood, more recent literature focused on multiple genetics and/or environmental risk factors. Heterogeneity of symptoms, especially in milder forms of this condition, could be a challenge for the clinician. In this work, an automatic speech classification algorithm is proposed to characterize the prosodic elements that best distinguish autism, to support the traditional diagnosis. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluted by testing the classification algorithms on a dataset composed of recorded speeches, collected among both autustic and non autistic subjects.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Biased Programmers? Or Biased Data? A Field Experiment in Operationalizing AI Ethics
Authors:
Bo Cowgill,
Fabrizio Dell'Acqua,
Samuel Deng,
Daniel Hsu,
Nakul Verma,
Augustin Chaintreau
Abstract:
Why do biased predictions arise? What interventions can prevent them? We evaluate 8.2 million algorithmic predictions of math performance from $\approx$400 AI engineers, each of whom developed an algorithm under a randomly assigned experimental condition. Our treatment arms modified programmers' incentives, training data, awareness, and/or technical knowledge of AI ethics. We then assess out-of-sa…
▽ More
Why do biased predictions arise? What interventions can prevent them? We evaluate 8.2 million algorithmic predictions of math performance from $\approx$400 AI engineers, each of whom developed an algorithm under a randomly assigned experimental condition. Our treatment arms modified programmers' incentives, training data, awareness, and/or technical knowledge of AI ethics. We then assess out-of-sample predictions from their algorithms using randomized audit manipulations of algorithm inputs and ground-truth math performance for 20K subjects. We find that biased predictions are mostly caused by biased training data. However, one-third of the benefit of better training data comes through a novel economic mechanism: Engineers exert greater effort and are more responsive to incentives when given better training data. We also assess how performance varies with programmers' demographic characteristics, and their performance on a psychological test of implicit bias (IAT) concerning gender and careers. We find no evidence that female, minority and low-IAT engineers exhibit lower bias or discrimination in their code. However, we do find that prediction errors are correlated within demographic groups, which creates performance improvements through cross-demographic averaging. Finally, we quantify the benefits and tradeoffs of practical managerial or policy interventions such as technical advice, simple reminders, and improved incentives for decreasing algorithmic bias.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
The Managerial Effects of Algorithmic Fairness Activism
Authors:
Bo Cowgill,
Fabrizio Dell'Acqua,
Sandra Matz
Abstract:
How do ethical arguments affect AI adoption in business? We randomly expose business decision-makers to arguments used in AI fairness activism. Arguments emphasizing the inescapability of algorithmic bias lead managers to abandon AI for manual review by humans and report greater expectations about lawsuits and negative PR. These effects persist even when AI lowers gender and racial disparities and…
▽ More
How do ethical arguments affect AI adoption in business? We randomly expose business decision-makers to arguments used in AI fairness activism. Arguments emphasizing the inescapability of algorithmic bias lead managers to abandon AI for manual review by humans and report greater expectations about lawsuits and negative PR. These effects persist even when AI lowers gender and racial disparities and when engineering investments to address AI fairness are feasible. Emphasis on status quo comparisons yields opposite effects. We also measure the effects of "scientific veneer" in AI ethics arguments. Scientific veneer changes managerial behavior but does not asymmetrically benefit favorable (versus critical) AI activism.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Generalized Richardson-Lucy (GRL) for analyzing multi-shell diffusion MRI data
Authors:
Fenghua Guo,
Alexander Leemans,
Max A. Viergever,
Flavio Dell'Acqua,
Alberto De Luca
Abstract:
Spherical deconvolution is a widely used approach to quantify fiber orientation distribution from diffusion MRI data. The damped Richardson-Lucy (dRL) is developed to perform robust spherical deconvolution on single shell diffusion MRI data. While the dRL algorithm could in theory be directly applied to multi-shell data, it is not optimised to model the signal from multiple tissue types. In this w…
▽ More
Spherical deconvolution is a widely used approach to quantify fiber orientation distribution from diffusion MRI data. The damped Richardson-Lucy (dRL) is developed to perform robust spherical deconvolution on single shell diffusion MRI data. While the dRL algorithm could in theory be directly applied to multi-shell data, it is not optimised to model the signal from multiple tissue types. In this work, we introduce a new framework based on dRL - dubbed Generalized Richardson Lucy (GRL) - that uses multi-shell data in combination with user-chosen tissue models to disentangle partial volume effects and increase the accuracy in FOD estimation. The optimal weighting of multi-shell data in the fit and the robustness to noise and partial volume effects of GRL was studied with synthetic data. Subsequently, we investigated the performances of GRL in comparison to dRL on a high-resolution diffusion MRI dataset from the Human Connectome Project and on an MRI dataset acquired at 3T on a clinical scanner. The feasibility of including intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) effects in the modelling was studied on a third dataset. Results of simulations show that GRL can robustly disentangle different tissue types at SNR above 20 and improves the angular accuracy of the FOD estimation. On real data, GRL provides signal fraction maps that are physiologically plausible and consistent between datasets. When considering IVIM effects, high blood pseudo-diffusion fraction is observed in the medial temporal lobe and in the sagittal sinus. In comparison to dRL, GRL provides sharper FODs and less spurious peaks in presence of partial volume effects and results in a better tract termination at the grey/white matter interface or at the outer cortical surface. In conclusion, GRL offers a new modular and flexible framework to perform spherical deconvolution of multi-shell data.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2020; v1 submitted 11 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
