Evaluation of software impact designed for biomedical research: Are we measuring what's meaningful?
Authors:
Awan Afiaz,
Andrey Ivanov,
John Chamberlin,
David Hanauer,
Candace Savonen,
Mary J Goldman,
Martin Morgan,
Michael Reich,
Alexander Getka,
Aaron Holmes,
Sarthak Pati,
Dan Knight,
Paul C. Boutros,
Spyridon Bakas,
J. Gregory Caporaso,
Guilherme Del Fiol,
Harry Hochheiser,
Brian Haas,
Patrick D. Schloss,
James A. Eddy,
Jake Albrecht,
Andrey Fedorov,
Levi Waldron,
Ava M. Hoffman,
Richard L. Bradshaw
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Software is vital for the advancement of biology and medicine. Analysis of usage and impact metrics can help developers determine user and community engagement, justify additional funding, encourage additional use, identify unanticipated use cases, and help define improvement areas. However, there are challenges associated with these analyses including distorted or misleading metrics, as well as e…
▽ More
Software is vital for the advancement of biology and medicine. Analysis of usage and impact metrics can help developers determine user and community engagement, justify additional funding, encourage additional use, identify unanticipated use cases, and help define improvement areas. However, there are challenges associated with these analyses including distorted or misleading metrics, as well as ethical and security concerns. More attention to the nuances involved in capturing impact across the spectrum of biological software is needed. Furthermore, some tools may be especially beneficial to a small audience, yet may not have compelling typical usage metrics. We propose more general guidelines, as well as strategies for more specific types of software. We highlight outstanding issues regarding how communities measure or evaluate software impact. To get a deeper understanding of current practices for software evaluations, we performed a survey of participants in the Informatics Technology for Cancer Research (ITCR) program funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). We also investigated software among this community and others to assess how often infrastructure that supports such evaluations is implemented and how this impacts rates of papers describing usage of the software. We find that developers recognize the utility of analyzing software usage, but struggle to find the time or funding for such analyses. We also find that infrastructure such as social media presence, more in-depth documentation, the presence of software health metrics, and clear information on how to contact developers seem to be associated with increased usage rates. Our findings can help scientific software developers make the most out of evaluations of their software.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
A sco** review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNet
Authors:
Mohammad Amin Morid,
Alireza Borjali,
Guilherme Del Fiol
Abstract:
Objective: Employing transfer learning (TL) with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), well-trained on non-medical ImageNet dataset, has shown promising results for medical image analysis in recent years. We aimed to conduct a sco** review to identify these studies and summarize their characteristics in terms of the problem description, input, methodology, and outcome. Materials and Methods: To…
▽ More
Objective: Employing transfer learning (TL) with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), well-trained on non-medical ImageNet dataset, has shown promising results for medical image analysis in recent years. We aimed to conduct a sco** review to identify these studies and summarize their characteristics in terms of the problem description, input, methodology, and outcome. Materials and Methods: To identify relevant studies, MEDLINE, IEEE, and ACM digital library were searched. Two investigators independently reviewed articles to determine eligibility and to extract data according to a study protocol defined a priori. Results: After screening of 8,421 articles, 102 met the inclusion criteria. Of 22 anatomical areas, eye (18%), breast (14%), and brain (12%) were the most commonly studied. Data augmentation was performed in 72% of fine-tuning TL studies versus 15% of the feature-extracting TL studies. Inception models were the most commonly used in breast related studies (50%), while VGGNet was the common in eye (44%), skin (50%) and tooth (57%) studies. AlexNet for brain (42%) and DenseNet for lung studies (38%) were the most frequently used models. Inception models were the most frequently used for studies that analyzed ultrasound (55%), endoscopy (57%), and skeletal system X-rays (57%). VGGNet was the most common for fundus (42%) and optical coherence tomography images (50%). AlexNet was the most frequent model for brain MRIs (36%) and breast X-Rays (50%). 35% of the studies compared their model with other well-trained CNN models and 33% of them provided visualization for interpretation. Discussion: This study identified the most prevalent tracks of implementation in the literature for data preparation, methodology selection and output evaluation for medical image analysis. Also, we identified several critical research gaps existing in the TL studies on medical image analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2020; v1 submitted 27 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
