-
A Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Approach to Registration of CLARITY Images via Mutual Information
Authors:
Kwame S. Kutten,
Nicolas Charon,
Michael I. Miller,
J. T. Ratnanather,
Jordan Matelsky,
Alexander D. Baden,
Kunal Lillaney,
Karl Deisseroth,
Li Ye,
Joshua T. Vogelstein
Abstract:
CLARITY is a method for converting biological tissues into translucent and porous hydrogel-tissue hybrids. This facilitates interrogation with light sheet microscopy and penetration of molecular probes while avoiding physical slicing. In this work, we develop a pipeline for registering CLARIfied mouse brains to an annotated brain atlas. Due to the novelty of this microscopy technique it is impract…
▽ More
CLARITY is a method for converting biological tissues into translucent and porous hydrogel-tissue hybrids. This facilitates interrogation with light sheet microscopy and penetration of molecular probes while avoiding physical slicing. In this work, we develop a pipeline for registering CLARIfied mouse brains to an annotated brain atlas. Due to the novelty of this microscopy technique it is impractical to use absolute intensity values to align these images to existing standard atlases. Thus we adopt a large deformation diffeomorphic approach for registering images via mutual information matching. Furthermore we show how a cascaded multi-resolution approach can improve registration quality while reducing algorithm run time. As acquired image volumes were over a terabyte in size, they were far too large for work on personal computers. Therefore the NeuroData computational infrastructure was deployed for multi-resolution storage and visualization of these images and aligned annotations on the web.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2017; v1 submitted 1 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Deformably Registering and Annotating Whole CLARITY Brains to an Atlas via Masked LDDMM
Authors:
Kwame S. Kutten,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Nicolas Charon,
Li Ye,
Karl Deisseroth,
Michael I. Miller
Abstract:
The CLARITY method renders brains optically transparent to enable high-resolution imaging in the structurally intact brain. Anatomically annotating CLARITY brains is necessary for discovering which regions contain signals of interest. Manually annotating whole-brain, terabyte CLARITY images is difficult, time-consuming, subjective, and error-prone. Automatically registering CLARITY images to a pre…
▽ More
The CLARITY method renders brains optically transparent to enable high-resolution imaging in the structurally intact brain. Anatomically annotating CLARITY brains is necessary for discovering which regions contain signals of interest. Manually annotating whole-brain, terabyte CLARITY images is difficult, time-consuming, subjective, and error-prone. Automatically registering CLARITY images to a pre-annotated brain atlas offers a solution, but is difficult for several reasons. Removal of the brain from the skull and subsequent storage and processing cause variable non-rigid deformations, thus compounding inter-subject anatomical variability. Additionally, the signal in CLARITY images arises from various biochemical contrast agents which only sparsely label brain structures. This sparse labeling challenges the most commonly used registration algorithms that need to match image histogram statistics to the more densely labeled histological brain atlases. The standard method is a multiscale Mutual Information B-spline algorithm that dynamically generates an average template as an intermediate registration target. We determined that this method performs poorly when registering CLARITY brains to the Allen Institute's Mouse Reference Atlas (ARA), because the image histogram statistics are poorly matched. Therefore, we developed a method (Mask-LDDMM) for registering CLARITY images, that automatically find the brain boundary and learns the optimal deformation between the brain and atlas masks. Using Mask-LDDMM without an average template provided better results than the standard approach when registering CLARITY brains to the ARA. The LDDMM pipelines developed here provide a fast automated way to anatomically annotate CLARITY images. Our code is available as open source software at http://NeuroData.io.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
The Open Connectome Project Data Cluster: Scalable Analysis and Vision for High-Throughput Neuroscience
Authors:
Randal Burns,
William Gray Roncal,
Dean Kleissas,
Kunal Lillaney,
Priya Manavalan,
Eric Perlman,
Daniel R. Berger,
Davi D. Bock,
Kwanghun Chung,
Logan Grosenick,
Narayanan Kasthuri,
Nicholas C. Weiler,
Karl Deisseroth,
Michael Kazhdan,
Jeff Lichtman,
R. Clay Reid,
Stephen J. Smith,
Alexander S. Szalay,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
R. Jacob Vogelstein
Abstract:
We describe a scalable database cluster for the spatial analysis and annotation of high-throughput brain imaging data, initially for 3-d electron microscopy image stacks, but for time-series and multi-channel data as well. The system was designed primarily for workloads that build connectomes---neural connectivity maps of the brain---using the parallel execution of computer vision algorithms on hi…
▽ More
We describe a scalable database cluster for the spatial analysis and annotation of high-throughput brain imaging data, initially for 3-d electron microscopy image stacks, but for time-series and multi-channel data as well. The system was designed primarily for workloads that build connectomes---neural connectivity maps of the brain---using the parallel execution of computer vision algorithms on high-performance compute clusters. These services and open-science data sets are publicly available at http://openconnecto.me.
The system design inherits much from NoSQL scale-out and data-intensive computing architectures. We distribute data to cluster nodes by partitioning a spatial index. We direct I/O to different systems---reads to parallel disk arrays and writes to solid-state storage---to avoid I/O interference and maximize throughput. All programming interfaces are RESTful Web services, which are simple and stateless, improving scalability and usability. We include a performance evaluation of the production system, highlighting the effectiveness of spatial data organization.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2013; v1 submitted 14 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
