Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Decadt, A

Decision-making with E-admissibility given a finite assessment of choices

Authors: Arne Decadt, Alexander Erreygers, Jasper De Bock, Gert de Cooman

Abstract: Given information about which options a decision-maker definitely rejects from given finite sets of options, we study the implications for decision-making with E-admissibility. This means that from any finite set of options, we reject those options that no probability mass function compatible with the given information gives the highest expected utility. We use the mathematical framework of choice… ▽ More Given information about which options a decision-maker definitely rejects from given finite sets of options, we study the implications for decision-making with E-admissibility. This means that from any finite set of options, we reject those options that no probability mass function compatible with the given information gives the highest expected utility. We use the mathematical framework of choice functions to specify choices and rejections, and specify the available information in the form of conditions on such functions. We characterise the most conservative extension of the given information to a choice function that makes choices based on E-admissibility, and provide an algorithm that computes this extension by solving linear feasibility problems. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2022; v1 submitted 15 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: 11 pages, 1 figure, extended version of conference paper

Inference with Choice Functions Made Practical

Authors: Arne Decadt, Jasper De Bock, Gert de Cooman

Abstract: We study how to infer new choices from previous choices in a conservative manner. To make such inferences, we use the theory of choice functions: a unifying mathematical framework for conservative decision making that allows one to impose axioms directly on the represented decisions. We here adopt the coherence axioms of De Bock and De Cooman (2019). We show how to naturally extend any given choic… ▽ More We study how to infer new choices from previous choices in a conservative manner. To make such inferences, we use the theory of choice functions: a unifying mathematical framework for conservative decision making that allows one to impose axioms directly on the represented decisions. We here adopt the coherence axioms of De Bock and De Cooman (2019). We show how to naturally extend any given choice assessment to such a coherent choice function, whenever possible, and use this natural extension to make new choices. We present a practical algorithm to compute this natural extension and provide several methods that can be used to improve its scalability. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2020; v1 submitted 7 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.