-
Bias Mitigation via Compensation: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective
Authors:
Nandhini Swaminathan,
David Danks
Abstract:
As AI increasingly integrates with human decision-making, we must carefully consider interactions between the two. In particular, current approaches focus on optimizing individual agent actions but often overlook the nuances of collective intelligence. Group dynamics might require that one agent (e.g., the AI system) compensate for biases and errors in another agent (e.g., the human), but this com…
▽ More
As AI increasingly integrates with human decision-making, we must carefully consider interactions between the two. In particular, current approaches focus on optimizing individual agent actions but often overlook the nuances of collective intelligence. Group dynamics might require that one agent (e.g., the AI system) compensate for biases and errors in another agent (e.g., the human), but this compensation should be carefully developed. We provide a theoretical framework for algorithmic compensation that synthesizes game theory and reinforcement learning principles to demonstrate the natural emergence of deceptive outcomes from the continuous learning dynamics of agents. We provide simulation results involving Markov Decision Processes (MDP) learning to interact. This work then underpins our ethical analysis of the conditions in which AI agents should adapt to biases and behaviors of other agents in dynamic and complex decision-making environments. Overall, our approach addresses the nuanced role of strategic deception of humans, challenging previous assumptions about its detrimental effects. We assert that compensation for others' biases can enhance coordination and ethical alignment: strategic deception, when ethically managed, can positively shape human-AI interactions.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Application of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to Surveillance Technology
Authors:
Nandhini Swaminathan,
David Danks
Abstract:
This study offers an in-depth analysis of the application and implications of the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI RMF) within the domain of surveillance technologies, particularly facial recognition technology. Given the inherently high-risk and consequential nature of facial recognition systems, our research emphasizes the critical need for a…
▽ More
This study offers an in-depth analysis of the application and implications of the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI RMF) within the domain of surveillance technologies, particularly facial recognition technology. Given the inherently high-risk and consequential nature of facial recognition systems, our research emphasizes the critical need for a structured approach to risk management in this sector. The paper presents a detailed case study demonstrating the utility of the NIST AI RMF in identifying and mitigating risks that might otherwise remain unnoticed in these technologies. Our primary objective is to develop a comprehensive risk management strategy that advances the practice of responsible AI utilization in feasible, scalable ways. We propose a six-step process tailored to the specific challenges of surveillance technology that aims to produce a more systematic and effective risk management practice. This process emphasizes continual assessment and improvement to facilitate companies in managing AI-related risks more robustly and ensuring ethical and responsible deployment of AI systems. Additionally, our analysis uncovers and discusses critical gaps in the current framework of the NIST AI RMF, particularly concerning its application to surveillance technologies. These insights contribute to the evolving discourse on AI governance and risk management, highlighting areas for future refinement and development in frameworks like the NIST AI RMF.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Future of Pandemic Prevention and Response CCC Workshop Report
Authors:
David Danks,
Rada Mihalcea,
Katie Siek,
Mona Singh,
Brian Dixon,
Haley Griffin
Abstract:
This report summarizes the discussions and conclusions of a 2-day multidisciplinary workshop that brought together researchers and practitioners in healthcare, computer science, and social sciences to explore what lessons were learned and what actions, primarily in research, could be taken. One consistent observation was that there is significant merit in thinking not only about pandemic situation…
▽ More
This report summarizes the discussions and conclusions of a 2-day multidisciplinary workshop that brought together researchers and practitioners in healthcare, computer science, and social sciences to explore what lessons were learned and what actions, primarily in research, could be taken. One consistent observation was that there is significant merit in thinking not only about pandemic situations, but also about peacetime advances, as many healthcare networks and communities are now in a perpetual state of crisis. Attendees discussed how the COVID-19 pandemic amplified gaps in our health and computing systems, and how current and future computing technologies could fill these gaps and improve the trajectory of the next pandemic.
Three major computing themes emerged from the workshop: models, data, and infrastructure. Computational models are extremely important during pandemics, from anticipating supply needs of hospitals, to determining the care capacity of hospital and social service providers, to projecting the spread of the disease. Accurate, reliable models can save lives, and inform community leaders on policy decisions. Health system users require accurate, reliable data to achieve success when applying models. This requires data and measurement standardization across health care organizations, modernizing the data infrastructure, and methods for ensuring data remains private while shared for model development, validation, and application. Finally, many health care systems lack the data, compute, and communication infrastructures required to build models on their data, use those models in ordinary operations, or even to reliably access their data. Robust and timely computing research has the potential to better support healthcare works to save lives in times of crisis (e.g., pandemics) and today during relative peacetime.
△ Less
Submitted 29 February, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Commercial AI, Conflict, and Moral Responsibility: A theoretical analysis and practical approach to the moral responsibilities associated with dual-use AI technology
Authors:
Daniel Trusilo,
David Danks
Abstract:
This paper presents a theoretical analysis and practical approach to the moral responsibilities when develo** AI systems for non-military applications that may nonetheless be used for conflict applications. We argue that AI represents a form of crossover technology that is different from previous historical examples of dual- or multi-use technology as it has a multiplicative effect across other…
▽ More
This paper presents a theoretical analysis and practical approach to the moral responsibilities when develo** AI systems for non-military applications that may nonetheless be used for conflict applications. We argue that AI represents a form of crossover technology that is different from previous historical examples of dual- or multi-use technology as it has a multiplicative effect across other technologies. As a result, existing analyses of ethical responsibilities around dual-use technologies do not necessarily work for AI systems. We instead argue that stakeholders involved in the AI system lifecycle are morally responsible for uses of their systems that are reasonably foreseeable. The core idea is that an agent's moral responsibility for some action is not necessarily determined by their intentions alone; we must also consider what the agent could reasonably have foreseen to be potential outcomes of their action, such as the potential use of a system in conflict even when it is not designed for that. In particular, we contend that it is reasonably foreseeable that: (1) civilian AI systems will be applied to active conflict, including conflict support activities, (2) the use of civilian AI systems in conflict will impact applications of the law of armed conflict, and (3) crossover AI technology will be applied to conflicts that fall short of armed conflict. Given these reasonably foreseeably outcomes, we present three technically feasible actions that developers of civilian AIs can take to potentially mitigate their moral responsibility: (a) establishing systematic approaches to multi-perspective capability testing, (b) integrating digital watermarking in model weight matrices, and (c) utilizing monitoring and reporting mechanisms for conflict-related AI applications.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Beyond Behaviorist Representational Harms: A Plan for Measurement and Mitigation
Authors:
Jennifer Chien,
David Danks
Abstract:
Algorithmic harms are commonly categorized as either allocative or representational. This study specifically addresses the latter, focusing on an examination of current definitions of representational harms to discern what is included and what is not. This analysis motivates our expansion beyond behavioral definitions to encompass harms to cognitive and affective states. The paper outlines high-le…
▽ More
Algorithmic harms are commonly categorized as either allocative or representational. This study specifically addresses the latter, focusing on an examination of current definitions of representational harms to discern what is included and what is not. This analysis motivates our expansion beyond behavioral definitions to encompass harms to cognitive and affective states. The paper outlines high-level requirements for measurement: identifying the necessary expertise to implement this approach and illustrating it through a case study. Our work highlights the unique vulnerabilities of large language models to perpetrating representational harms, particularly when these harms go unmeasured and unmitigated. The work concludes by presenting proposed mitigations and delineating when to employ them. The overarching aim of this research is to establish a framework for broadening the definition of representational harms and to translate insights from fairness research into practical measurement and mitigation praxis.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024; v1 submitted 24 January, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Fairness Vs. Personalization: Towards Equity in Epistemic Utility
Authors:
Jennifer Chien,
David Danks
Abstract:
The applications of personalized recommender systems are rapidly expanding: encompassing social media, online shop**, search engine results, and more. These systems offer a more efficient way to navigate the vast array of items available. However, alongside this growth, there has been increased recognition of the potential for algorithmic systems to exhibit and perpetuate biases, risking unfairn…
▽ More
The applications of personalized recommender systems are rapidly expanding: encompassing social media, online shop**, search engine results, and more. These systems offer a more efficient way to navigate the vast array of items available. However, alongside this growth, there has been increased recognition of the potential for algorithmic systems to exhibit and perpetuate biases, risking unfairness in personalized domains. In this work, we explicate the inherent tension between personalization and conventional implementations of fairness. As an alternative, we propose equity to achieve fairness in the context of epistemic utility. We provide a map** between goals and practical implementations and detail policy recommendations across key stakeholders to forge a path towards achieving fairness in personalized systems.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
A Multi-Resolution Framework for U-Nets with Applications to Hierarchical VAEs
Authors:
Fabian Falck,
Christopher Williams,
Dominic Danks,
George Deligiannidis,
Christopher Yau,
Chris Holmes,
Arnaud Doucet,
Matthew Willetts
Abstract:
U-Net architectures are ubiquitous in state-of-the-art deep learning, however their regularisation properties and relationship to wavelets are understudied. In this paper, we formulate a multi-resolution framework which identifies U-Nets as finite-dimensional truncations of models on an infinite-dimensional function space. We provide theoretical results which prove that average pooling corresponds…
▽ More
U-Net architectures are ubiquitous in state-of-the-art deep learning, however their regularisation properties and relationship to wavelets are understudied. In this paper, we formulate a multi-resolution framework which identifies U-Nets as finite-dimensional truncations of models on an infinite-dimensional function space. We provide theoretical results which prove that average pooling corresponds to projection within the space of square-integrable functions and show that U-Nets with average pooling implicitly learn a Haar wavelet basis representation of the data. We then leverage our framework to identify state-of-the-art hierarchical VAEs (HVAEs), which have a U-Net architecture, as a type of two-step forward Euler discretisation of multi-resolution diffusion processes which flow from a point mass, introducing sampling instabilities. We also demonstrate that HVAEs learn a representation of time which allows for improved parameter efficiency through weight-sharing. We use this observation to achieve state-of-the-art HVAE performance with half the number of parameters of existing models, exploiting the properties of our continuous-time formulation.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Homophily and Incentive Effects in Use of Algorithms
Authors:
Riccardo Fogliato,
Sina Fazelpour,
Shantanu Gupta,
Zachary Lipton,
David Danks
Abstract:
As algorithmic tools increasingly aid experts in making consequential decisions, the need to understand the precise factors that mediate their influence has grown commensurately. In this paper, we present a crowdsourcing vignette study designed to assess the impacts of two plausible factors on AI-informed decision-making. First, we examine homophily -- do people defer more to models that tend to a…
▽ More
As algorithmic tools increasingly aid experts in making consequential decisions, the need to understand the precise factors that mediate their influence has grown commensurately. In this paper, we present a crowdsourcing vignette study designed to assess the impacts of two plausible factors on AI-informed decision-making. First, we examine homophily -- do people defer more to models that tend to agree with them? -- by manipulating the agreement during training between participants and the algorithmic tool. Second, we considered incentives -- how do people incorporate a (known) cost structure in the hybrid decision-making setting? -- by varying rewards associated with true positives vs. true negatives. Surprisingly, we found limited influence of either homophily and no evidence of incentive effects, despite participants performing similarly to previous studies. Higher levels of agreement between the participant and the AI tool yielded more confident predictions, but only when outcome feedback was absent. These results highlight the complexity of characterizing human-algorithm interactions, and suggest that findings from social psychology may require re-examination when humans interact with algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints
Authors:
Mohammadsajad Abavisani,
David Danks,
Sergey Plis
Abstract:
Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego…
▽ More
Graphical structures estimated by causal learning algorithms from time series data can provide misleading causal information if the causal timescale of the generating process fails to match the measurement timescale of the data. Existing algorithms provide limited resources to respond to this challenge, and so researchers must either use models that they know are likely misleading, or else forego causal learning entirely. Existing methods face up-to-four distinct shortfalls, as they might 1) require that the difference between causal and measurement timescales is known; 2) only handle very small number of random variables when the timescale difference is unknown; 3) only apply to pairs of variables; or 4) be unable to find a solution given statistical noise in the data. This research addresses these challenges. Our approach combines constraint programming with both theoretical insights into the problem structure and prior information about admissible causal interactions to achieve multiple orders of magnitude in speed-up. The resulting system maintains theoretical guarantees while scaling to significantly larger sets of random variables (>100) without knowledge of timescale differences. This method is also robust to edge misidentification and can use parametric connection strengths, while optionally finding the optimal solution among many possible ones.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024; v1 submitted 18 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Dynamic Certification for Autonomous Systems
Authors:
Georgios Bakirtzis,
Steven Carr,
David Danks,
Ufuk Topcu
Abstract:
Autonomous systems are often deployed in complex sociotechnical environments, such as public roads, where they must behave safely and securely. Unlike many traditionally engineered systems, autonomous systems are expected to behave predictably in varying "open world" environmental contexts that cannot be fully specified formally. As a result, assurance about autonomous systems requires us to devel…
▽ More
Autonomous systems are often deployed in complex sociotechnical environments, such as public roads, where they must behave safely and securely. Unlike many traditionally engineered systems, autonomous systems are expected to behave predictably in varying "open world" environmental contexts that cannot be fully specified formally. As a result, assurance about autonomous systems requires us to develop new certification methods and mathematical tools that can bound the uncertainty engendered by these diverse deployment scenarios, rather than relying on static tools.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 21 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Choosing with unknown causal information: Action-outcome probabilities for decision making can be grounded in causal models
Authors:
Mauricio Gonzalez Soto,
David Danks,
Hugo J. Escalante Balderas,
L. Enrique Sucar
Abstract:
Decision-making under uncertainty and causal thinking are fundamental aspects of intelligent reasoning. Decision-making has been well studied when the available information is considered at the associative (probabilistic) level. The classical Theorems of von Neumann-Morgenstern and Savage provide a formal criterion for rational choice using associative information: maximize expected utility. There…
▽ More
Decision-making under uncertainty and causal thinking are fundamental aspects of intelligent reasoning. Decision-making has been well studied when the available information is considered at the associative (probabilistic) level. The classical Theorems of von Neumann-Morgenstern and Savage provide a formal criterion for rational choice using associative information: maximize expected utility. There is an ongoing debate around the origin of probabilities involved in such calculation. In this work, we will show how the probabilities for decision-making can be grounded in causal models by considering decision problems in which the available actions and consequences are causally connected. In this setting, actions are regarded as an intervention over a causal model. Then, we extend a previous causal decision-making result, which relies on a known causal model, to the case in which the causal mechanism that controls some environment is unknown to a rational decision-maker. In this way, action-outcome probabilities can be grounded in causal models in known and unknown cases. Finally, as an application, we extend the well-known concept of Nash Equilibrium to the case in which the players of a strategic game consider causal information.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2022; v1 submitted 26 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
EQuANt (Enhanced Question Answer Network)
Authors:
François-Xavier Aubet,
Dominic Danks,
Yuchen Zhu
Abstract:
Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is an important topic in the domain of automated question answering and in natural language processing more generally. Since the release of the SQuAD 1.1 and SQuAD 2 datasets, progress in the field has been particularly significant, with current state-of-the-art models now exhibiting near-human performance at both answering well-posed questions and detecting que…
▽ More
Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is an important topic in the domain of automated question answering and in natural language processing more generally. Since the release of the SQuAD 1.1 and SQuAD 2 datasets, progress in the field has been particularly significant, with current state-of-the-art models now exhibiting near-human performance at both answering well-posed questions and detecting questions which are unanswerable given a corresponding context. In this work, we present Enhanced Question Answer Network (EQuANt), an MRC model which extends the successful QANet architecture of Yu et al. to cope with unanswerable questions. By training and evaluating EQuANt on SQuAD 2, we show that it is indeed possible to extend QANet to the unanswerable domain. We achieve results which are close to 2 times better than our chosen baseline obtained by evaluating a lightweight version of the original QANet architecture on SQuAD 2. In addition, we report that the performance of EQuANt on SQuAD 1.1 after being trained on SQuAD2 exceeds that of our lightweight QANet architecture trained and evaluated on SQuAD 1.1, demonstrating the utility of multi-task learning in the MRC context.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2019; v1 submitted 24 June, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Causal Discovery from Subsampled Time Series Data by Constraint Optimization
Authors:
Antti Hyttinen,
Sergey Plis,
Matti Järvisalo,
Frederick Eberhardt,
David Danks
Abstract:
This paper focuses on causal structure estimation from time series data in which measurements are obtained at a coarser timescale than the causal timescale of the underlying system. Previous work has shown that such subsampling can lead to significant errors about the system's causal structure if not properly taken into account. In this paper, we first consider the search for the system timescale…
▽ More
This paper focuses on causal structure estimation from time series data in which measurements are obtained at a coarser timescale than the causal timescale of the underlying system. Previous work has shown that such subsampling can lead to significant errors about the system's causal structure if not properly taken into account. In this paper, we first consider the search for the system timescale causal structures that correspond to a given measurement timescale structure. We provide a constraint satisfaction procedure whose computational performance is several orders of magnitude better than previous approaches. We then consider finite-sample data as input, and propose the first constraint optimization approach for recovering the system timescale causal structure. This algorithm optimally recovers from possible conflicts due to statistical errors. More generally, these advances allow for a robust and non-parametric estimation of system timescale causal structures from subsampled time series data.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2016; v1 submitted 25 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Linearity Properties of Bayes Nets with Binary Variables
Authors:
David Danks,
Clark Glymour
Abstract:
It is "well known" that in linear models: (1) testable constraints on the marginal distribution of observed variables distinguish certain cases in which an unobserved cause jointly influences several observed variables; (2) the technique of "instrumental variables" sometimes permits an estimation of the influence of one variable on another even when the association between the variables may be con…
▽ More
It is "well known" that in linear models: (1) testable constraints on the marginal distribution of observed variables distinguish certain cases in which an unobserved cause jointly influences several observed variables; (2) the technique of "instrumental variables" sometimes permits an estimation of the influence of one variable on another even when the association between the variables may be confounded by unobserved common causes; (3) the association (or conditional probability distribution of one variable given another) of two variables connected by a path or trek can be computed directly from the parameter values associated with each edge in the path or trek; (4) the association of two variables produced by multiple treks can be computed from the parameters associated with each trek; and (5) the independence of two variables conditional on a third implies the corresponding independence of the sums of the variables over all units conditional on the sums over all units of each of the original conditioning variables.These properties are exploited in search procedures. It is also known that properties (2)-(5) do not hold for all Bayes nets with binary variables. We show that (1) holds for all Bayes nets with binary variables and (5) holds for all singly trek-connected Bayes nets of that kind. We further show that all five properties hold for Bayes nets with any DAG and binary variables parameterized with noisy-or and noisy-and gates.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.
