Fairness and bias correction in machine learning for depression prediction: results from four study populations
Authors:
Vien Ngoc Dang,
Anna Cascarano,
Rosa H. Mulder,
Charlotte Cecil,
Maria A. Zuluaga,
Jerónimo Hernández-González,
Karim Lekadir
Abstract:
A significant level of stigma and inequality exists in mental healthcare, especially in under-served populations. Inequalities are reflected in the data collected for scientific purposes. When not properly accounted for, machine learning (ML) models leart from data can reinforce these structural inequalities or biases. Here, we present a systematic study of bias in ML models designed to predict de…
▽ More
A significant level of stigma and inequality exists in mental healthcare, especially in under-served populations. Inequalities are reflected in the data collected for scientific purposes. When not properly accounted for, machine learning (ML) models leart from data can reinforce these structural inequalities or biases. Here, we present a systematic study of bias in ML models designed to predict depression in four different case studies covering different countries and populations. We find that standard ML approaches show regularly biased behaviors. We also show that mitigation techniques, both standard and our own post-hoc method, can be effective in reducing the level of unfair bias. No single best ML model for depression prediction provides equality of outcomes. This emphasizes the importance of analyzing fairness during model selection and transparent reporting about the impact of debiasing interventions. Finally, we provide practical recommendations to develop bias-aware ML models for depression risk prediction.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2023; v1 submitted 9 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
Vessel-CAPTCHA: an efficient learning framework for vessel annotation and segmentation
Authors:
Vien Ngoc Dang,
Francesco Galati,
Rosa Cortese,
Giuseppe Di Giacomo,
Viola Marconetto,
Prateek Mathur,
Karim Lekadir,
Marco Lorenzi,
Ferran Prados,
Maria A. Zuluaga
Abstract:
Deep learning techniques for 3D brain vessel image segmentation have not been as successful as in the segmentation of other organs and tissues. This can be explained by two factors. First, deep learning techniques tend to show poor performances at the segmentation of relatively small objects compared to the size of the full image. Second, due to the complexity of vascular trees and the small size…
▽ More
Deep learning techniques for 3D brain vessel image segmentation have not been as successful as in the segmentation of other organs and tissues. This can be explained by two factors. First, deep learning techniques tend to show poor performances at the segmentation of relatively small objects compared to the size of the full image. Second, due to the complexity of vascular trees and the small size of vessels, it is challenging to obtain the amount of annotated training data typically needed by deep learning methods. To address these problems, we propose a novel annotation-efficient deep learning vessel segmentation framework. The framework avoids pixel-wise annotations, only requiring weak patch-level labels to discriminate between vessel and non-vessel 2D patches in the training set, in a setup similar to the CAPTCHAs used to differentiate humans from bots in web applications. The user-provided weak annotations are used for two tasks: 1) to synthesize pixel-wise pseudo-labels for vessels and background in each patch, which are used to train a segmentation network, and 2) to train a classifier network. The classifier network allows to generate additional weak patch labels, further reducing the annotation burden, and it acts as a noise filter for poor quality images. We use this framework for the segmentation of the cerebrovascular tree in Time-of-Flight angiography (TOF) and Susceptibility-Weighted Images (SWI). The results show that the framework achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, while reducing the annotation time by ~77% w.r.t. learning-based segmentation methods using pixel-wise labels for training.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2021; v1 submitted 22 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
