Distributed derandomization revisited
Authors:
Sameep Dahal,
Francesco d'Amore,
Henrik Lievonen,
Timothé Picavet,
Jukka Suomela
Abstract:
One of the cornerstones of the distributed complexity theory is the derandomization result by Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS 2016]: any randomized LOCAL algorithm that solves a locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) can be derandomized with at most exponential overhead. The original proof assumes that the number of random bits is bounded by some function of the input size. We give a new, si…
▽ More
One of the cornerstones of the distributed complexity theory is the derandomization result by Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS 2016]: any randomized LOCAL algorithm that solves a locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) can be derandomized with at most exponential overhead. The original proof assumes that the number of random bits is bounded by some function of the input size. We give a new, simple proof that does not make any such assumptions-it holds even if the randomized algorithm uses infinitely many bits. While at it, we also broaden the scope of the result so that it is directly applicable far beyond LCL problems.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 12 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Distributed Half-Integral Matching and Beyond
Authors:
Sameep Dahal,
Jukka Suomela
Abstract:
By prior work, it is known that any distributed graph algorithm that finds a maximal matching requires $Ω(\log^* n)$ communication rounds, while it is possible to find a maximal fractional matching in $O(1)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs. However, all prior $O(1)$-round algorithms for maximal fractional matching use arbitrarily fine-grained fractional values. In particular, none of them is able…
▽ More
By prior work, it is known that any distributed graph algorithm that finds a maximal matching requires $Ω(\log^* n)$ communication rounds, while it is possible to find a maximal fractional matching in $O(1)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs. However, all prior $O(1)$-round algorithms for maximal fractional matching use arbitrarily fine-grained fractional values. In particular, none of them is able to find a half-integral solution, using only values from $\{0, \frac12, 1\}$. We show that the use of fine-grained fractional values is necessary, and moreover we give a complete characterization on exactly how small values are needed: if we consider maximal fractional matching in graphs of maximum degree $Δ= 2d$, and any distributed graph algorithm with round complexity $T(Δ)$ that only depends on $Δ$ and is independent of $n$, we show that the algorithm has to use fractional values with a denominator at least $2^d$. We give a new algorithm that shows that this is also sufficient.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2023; v1 submitted 9 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
