Predicting the risk of pancreatic cancer with a CT-based ensemble AI algorithm
Authors:
Chenjie Zhou MD,
Jianhua Ma Ph. D,
** Xu MD,
Lei Feng MD,
Adilijiang Yimamu MD,
Xianlong Wang MD,
Zhiming Li MD,
Jianhua Mo MS,
Chengyan Huang MS,
Dexia Kong MS,
Yi Gao MD,
Shulong Li Ph. D
Abstract:
Objectives: Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease, hard to diagnose and usually results in poor prognosis and high mortality. Develo** an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to accurately and universally predict the early cancer risk of all kinds of pancreatic cancer is extremely important. We propose an ensemble AI algorithm to predict universally cancer risk of all kinds of pancreatic lesio…
▽ More
Objectives: Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease, hard to diagnose and usually results in poor prognosis and high mortality. Develo** an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to accurately and universally predict the early cancer risk of all kinds of pancreatic cancer is extremely important. We propose an ensemble AI algorithm to predict universally cancer risk of all kinds of pancreatic lesions with noncontrast CT. Methods: Our algorithm combines the radiomics method and a support tensor machine (STM) by the evidence reasoning (ER) technique to construct a binary classifier, called RadSTM-ER. RadSTM-ER takes advantage of the handcrafted features used in radiomics and learning features learned automatically by the STM from the CTs for presenting better characteristics of lesions. The patient cohort consisted of 135 patients with pathological diagnosis results where 97 patients had malignant lesions. Twenty-seven patients were randomly selected as independent test samples, and the remaining patients were used in a 5-fold cross validation experiment to confirm the hyperparameters, select optimal handcrafted features and train the model. Results: RadSTM-ER achieved independent test results: an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8951, an accuracy of 85.19%, a sensitivity of 88.89%, a specificity of 77.78%, a positive predictive value of 88.89% and a negative predictive value of 77.78%. Conclusions: These results are better than the diagnostic performance of the five experimental radiologists, four conventional AI algorithms, which initially demonstrate the potential of noncontrast CT-based RadSTM-ER in cancer risk prediction for all kinds of pancreatic lesions.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
Measures of Cluster Informativeness for Medical Evidence Aggregation and Dissemination
Authors:
Michael Segundo Ortiz,
Sam Bubnovich,
Mengqian Wang,
Kazuhiro Seki Ph. D.,
Javed Mostafa Ph. D
Abstract:
The largest collection of medical evidence in the world is PubMed. However, the significant barrier in accessing and extracting information is information organization. A factor that contributes towards this barrier is managing medical controlled vocabularies that allow us to systematically and consistently organize, index, and search biomedical literature. Additionally, from users' perspective, t…
▽ More
The largest collection of medical evidence in the world is PubMed. However, the significant barrier in accessing and extracting information is information organization. A factor that contributes towards this barrier is managing medical controlled vocabularies that allow us to systematically and consistently organize, index, and search biomedical literature. Additionally, from users' perspective, to ultimately improve access, visualization is likely to play a powerful role. There is a strong link between information organization and information visualization, as many powerful visualizations depend on clustering methods. To improve visualization, therefore, one has to develop concrete and scalable measures for vocabularies used in indexing and their impact on document clustering. The focus of this study is on the development and evaluation of clustering methods. The paper concludes with demonstration of downstream network visualizations and their impact on discovering potentially valuable and latent genetic and molecular associations.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
