Towards Automatic Honey Bee Flower-Patch Assays with Paint Marking Re-Identification
Authors:
Luke Meyers,
Josué Rodríguez Cordero,
Carlos Corrada Bravo,
Fanfan Noel,
José Agosto-Rivera,
Tugrul Giray,
Rémi Mégret
Abstract:
In this paper, we show that paint markings are a feasible approach to automatize the analysis of behavioral assays involving honey bees in the field where marking has to be as lightweight as possible. We contribute a novel dataset for bees re-identification with paint-markings with 4392 images and 27 identities. Contrastive learning with a ResNet backbone and triplet loss led to identity represent…
▽ More
In this paper, we show that paint markings are a feasible approach to automatize the analysis of behavioral assays involving honey bees in the field where marking has to be as lightweight as possible. We contribute a novel dataset for bees re-identification with paint-markings with 4392 images and 27 identities. Contrastive learning with a ResNet backbone and triplet loss led to identity representation features with almost perfect recognition in closed setting where identities are known in advance. Diverse experiments evaluate the capability to generalize to separate IDs, and show the impact of using different body parts for identification, such as using the unmarked abdomen only. In addition, we show the potential to fully automate the visit detection and provide preliminary results of compute time for future real-time deployment in the field on an edge device.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
What and How Are We Reporting in HRI? A Review and Recommendations for Reporting Recruitment, Compensation, and Gender
Authors:
Julia R. Cordero,
Thomas R. Groechel,
Maja J. Matarić
Abstract:
Study reproducibility and generalizability of results to broadly inclusive populations is crucial in any research. Previous meta-analyses in HRI have focused on the consistency of reported information from papers in various categories. However, members of the HRI community have noted that much of the information needed for reproducible and generalizable studies is not found in published papers. We…
▽ More
Study reproducibility and generalizability of results to broadly inclusive populations is crucial in any research. Previous meta-analyses in HRI have focused on the consistency of reported information from papers in various categories. However, members of the HRI community have noted that much of the information needed for reproducible and generalizable studies is not found in published papers. We address this issue by surveying the reported study metadata over the past three years (2019 through 2021) of the main proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) as well as alt.HRI. Based on the analysis results, we propose a set of recommendations for the HRI community that follow the longer-standing reporting guidelines from human-computer interaction (HCI), psychology, and other fields most related to HRI. Finally, we examine three key areas for user study reproducibility: recruitment details, participant compensation, and participant gender. We find a lack of reporting within each of these study metadata categories: of the 236 studies, 139 studies failed to report recruitment method, 118 studies failed to report compensation, and 62 studies failed to report gender data. This analysis therefore provides guidance about specific types of needed reporting improvements for HRI.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2022; v1 submitted 22 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
