On legitimate mining of cryptocurrency in the browser - a feasibility study
Authors:
Saulius Venskutonis,
Feng Hao,
Matthew Collison
Abstract:
Cryptocurrency mining in the browser has the potential to provide a new pay-as-you-go monetisation mechanism for consuming digital media over the Web. However, browser mining has recently received strong criticism due to illegitimate use of mining scripts in several popular websites (a practice called cryptojacking). Here we provide the first feasibility study of browser mining as a legitimate mea…
▽ More
Cryptocurrency mining in the browser has the potential to provide a new pay-as-you-go monetisation mechanism for consuming digital media over the Web. However, browser mining has recently received strong criticism due to illegitimate use of mining scripts in several popular websites (a practice called cryptojacking). Here we provide the first feasibility study of browser mining as a legitimate means of monetisation in terms of revenue, user consent and user experience within a specially built website. Our results compare browser mining to display advertisement and indicate browser mining provides a preferable user experience to advertising when the hash rate is user-adjustable. Furthermore, over 60% of participants would select browser mining over advertisement if they were invested in the ecosystem by obtaining half of the mined cryptocurrency. Our estimations show that browser mining currently generates revenue at a rate 46 times less than advertisement, however we would expect that gap to decrease as we observed a significant drop in mining difficulty after our tested cryptocurrency implemented ASIC-resistant mining measures. Overall, based on our results we find browser mining to be a legitimate alternative to display advertisement and conclude by discussing its current limitations and potential applications.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2019; v1 submitted 10 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
Can inferred provenance and its visualisation be used to detect erroneous annotation? A case study using UniProtKB
Authors:
Michael J. Bell,
Matthew Collison,
Phillip Lord
Abstract:
A constant influx of new data poses a challenge in kee** the annotation in biological databases current. Most biological databases contain significant quantities of textual annotation, which often contains the richest source of knowledge. Many databases reuse existing knowledge, during the curation process annotations are often propagated between entries. However, this is often not made explicit…
▽ More
A constant influx of new data poses a challenge in kee** the annotation in biological databases current. Most biological databases contain significant quantities of textual annotation, which often contains the richest source of knowledge. Many databases reuse existing knowledge, during the curation process annotations are often propagated between entries. However, this is often not made explicit. Therefore, it can be hard, potentially impossible, for a reader to identify where an annotation originated from. Within this work we attempt to identify annotation provenance and track its subsequent propagation. Specifically, we exploit annotation reuse within the UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB), at the level of individual sentences. We describe a visualisation approach for the provenance and propagation of sentences in UniProtKB which enables a large-scale statistical analysis. Initially levels of sentence reuse within UniProtKB were analysed, showing that reuse is heavily prevalent, which enables the tracking of provenance and propagation. By analysing sentences throughout UniProtKB, a number of interesting propagation patterns were identified, covering over 100, 000 sentences. Over 8000 sentences remain in the database after they have been removed from the entries where they originally occurred. Analysing a subset of these sentences suggest that approximately 30% are erroneous, whilst 35% appear to be inconsistent. These results suggest that being able to visualise sentence propagation and provenance can aid in the determination of the accuracy and quality of textual annotation. Source code and supplementary data are available from the authors website.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
