-
RakutenAI-7B: Extending Large Language Models for Japanese
Authors:
Rakuten Group,
Aaron Levine,
Connie Huang,
Chenguang Wang,
Eduardo Batista,
Ewa Szymanska,
Hongyi Ding,
Hou Wei Chou,
Jean-François Pessiot,
Johanes Effendi,
Justin Chiu,
Kai Torben Ohlhus,
Karan Chopra,
Keiji Shinzato,
Koji Murakami,
Lee Xiong,
Lei Chen,
Maki Kubota,
Maksim Tkachenko,
Miroku Lee,
Naoki Takahashi,
Prathyusha Jwalapuram,
Ryutaro Tatsushima,
Saurabh Jain,
Sunil Kumar Yadav
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We introduce RakutenAI-7B, a suite of Japanese-oriented large language models that achieve the best performance on the Japanese LM Harness benchmarks among the open 7B models. Along with the foundation model, we release instruction- and chat-tuned models, RakutenAI-7B-instruct and RakutenAI-7B-chat respectively, under the Apache 2.0 license.
We introduce RakutenAI-7B, a suite of Japanese-oriented large language models that achieve the best performance on the Japanese LM Harness benchmarks among the open 7B models. Along with the foundation model, we release instruction- and chat-tuned models, RakutenAI-7B-instruct and RakutenAI-7B-chat respectively, under the Apache 2.0 license.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Randomized Controlled Trials without Data Retention
Authors:
Winston Chou
Abstract:
Amidst rising appreciation for privacy and data usage rights, researchers have increasingly acknowledged the principle of data minimization, which holds that the accessibility, collection, and retention of subjects' data should be kept to the bare amount needed to answer focused research questions. Applying this principle to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this paper presents algorithms for m…
▽ More
Amidst rising appreciation for privacy and data usage rights, researchers have increasingly acknowledged the principle of data minimization, which holds that the accessibility, collection, and retention of subjects' data should be kept to the bare amount needed to answer focused research questions. Applying this principle to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this paper presents algorithms for making accurate inferences from RCTs under stringent data retention and anonymization policies. In particular, we show how to use recursive algorithms to construct running estimates of treatment effects in RCTs, which allow individualized records to be deleted or anonymized shortly after collection. Devoting special attention to non-i.i.d. data, we further show how to draw robust inferences from RCTs by combining recursive algorithms with bootstrap and federated strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 5 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
MLPerf Mobile Inference Benchmark
Authors:
Vijay Janapa Reddi,
David Kanter,
Peter Mattson,
Jared Duke,
Thai Nguyen,
Ramesh Chukka,
Ken Shiring,
Koan-Sin Tan,
Mark Charlebois,
William Chou,
Mostafa El-Khamy,
Jungwook Hong,
Tom St. John,
Cindy Trinh,
Michael Buch,
Mark Mazumder,
Relia Markovic,
Thomas Atta,
Fatih Cakir,
Masoud Charkhabi,
Xiaodong Chen,
Cheng-Ming Chiang,
Dave Dexter,
Terry Heo,
Gunther Schmuelling
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the first industry-standard open-source machine learning (ML) benchmark to allow perfor mance and accuracy evaluation of mobile devices with different AI chips and software stacks. The benchmark draws from the expertise of leading mobile-SoC vendors, ML-framework providers, and model producers. It comprises a suite of models that operate with standard data sets, quality metrics…
▽ More
This paper presents the first industry-standard open-source machine learning (ML) benchmark to allow perfor mance and accuracy evaluation of mobile devices with different AI chips and software stacks. The benchmark draws from the expertise of leading mobile-SoC vendors, ML-framework providers, and model producers. It comprises a suite of models that operate with standard data sets, quality metrics and run rules. We describe the design and implementation of this domain-specific ML benchmark. The current benchmark version comes as a mobile app for different computer vision and natural language processing tasks. The benchmark also supports non-smartphone devices, such as laptops and mobile PCs. Benchmark results from the first two rounds reveal the overwhelming complexity of the underlying mobile ML system stack, emphasizing the need for transparency in mobile ML performance analysis. The results also show that the strides being made all through the ML stack improve performance. Within six months, offline throughput improved by 3x, while latency reduced by as much as 12x. ML is an evolving field with changing use cases, models, data sets and quality targets. MLPerf Mobile will evolve and serve as an open-source community framework to guide research and innovation for mobile AI.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2022; v1 submitted 3 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
MLPerf Inference Benchmark
Authors:
Vijay Janapa Reddi,
Christine Cheng,
David Kanter,
Peter Mattson,
Guenther Schmuelling,
Carole-Jean Wu,
Brian Anderson,
Maximilien Breughe,
Mark Charlebois,
William Chou,
Ramesh Chukka,
Cody Coleman,
Sam Davis,
Pan Deng,
Greg Diamos,
Jared Duke,
Dave Fick,
J. Scott Gardner,
Itay Hubara,
Sachin Idgunji,
Thomas B. Jablin,
Jeff Jiao,
Tom St. John,
Pankaj Kanwar,
David Lee
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning. Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance; they range from embedded devic…
▽ More
Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning. Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance; they range from embedded devices to data-center solutions. Fueling the hardware are a dozen or more software frameworks and libraries. The myriad combinations of ML hardware and ML software make assessing ML-system performance in an architecture-neutral, representative, and reproducible manner challenging. There is a clear need for industry-wide standard ML benchmarking and evaluation criteria. MLPerf Inference answers that call. In this paper, we present our benchmarking method for evaluating ML inference systems. Driven by more than 30 organizations as well as more than 200 ML engineers and practitioners, MLPerf prescribes a set of rules and best practices to ensure comparability across systems with wildly differing architectures. The first call for submissions garnered more than 600 reproducible inference-performance measurements from 14 organizations, representing over 30 systems that showcase a wide range of capabilities. The submissions attest to the benchmark's flexibility and adaptability.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2020; v1 submitted 6 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
AI Benchmark: Running Deep Neural Networks on Android Smartphones
Authors:
Andrey Ignatov,
Radu Timofte,
William Chou,
Ke Wang,
Max Wu,
Tim Hartley,
Luc Van Gool
Abstract:
Over the last years, the computational power of mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets has grown dramatically, reaching the level of desktop computers available not long ago. While standard smartphone apps are no longer a problem for them, there is still a group of tasks that can easily challenge even high-end devices, namely running artificial intelligence algorithms. In this paper, we pr…
▽ More
Over the last years, the computational power of mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets has grown dramatically, reaching the level of desktop computers available not long ago. While standard smartphone apps are no longer a problem for them, there is still a group of tasks that can easily challenge even high-end devices, namely running artificial intelligence algorithms. In this paper, we present a study of the current state of deep learning in the Android ecosystem and describe available frameworks, programming models and the limitations of running AI on smartphones. We give an overview of the hardware acceleration resources available on four main mobile chipset platforms: Qualcomm, HiSilicon, MediaTek and Samsung. Additionally, we present the real-world performance results of different mobile SoCs collected with AI Benchmark that are covering all main existing hardware configurations.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2018; v1 submitted 2 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
