Showing 1–16 of 16 results for author: Chaudhari, A S

Enhance the Image: Super Resolution using Artificial Intelligence in MRI

Authors: Ziyu Li, Zihan Li, Haoxiang Li, Qiuyun Fan, Karla L. Miller, Wenchuan Wu, Akshay S. Chaudhari, Qiyuan Tian

Abstract: This chapter provides an overview of deep learning techniques for improving the spatial resolution of MRI, ranging from convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, to more advanced models including transformers, diffusion models, and implicit neural representations. Our exploration extends beyond the methodologies to scrutinize the impact of super-resolved images on clinical an… ▽ More This chapter provides an overview of deep learning techniques for improving the spatial resolution of MRI, ranging from convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, to more advanced models including transformers, diffusion models, and implicit neural representations. Our exploration extends beyond the methodologies to scrutinize the impact of super-resolved images on clinical and neuroscientific assessments. We also cover various practical topics such as network architectures, image evaluation metrics, network loss functions, and training data specifics, including downsampling methods for simulating low-resolution images and dataset selection. Finally, we discuss existing challenges and potential future directions regarding the feasibility and reliability of deep learning-based MRI super-resolution, with the aim to facilitate its wider adoption to benefit various clinical and neuroscientific applications. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: A book chapter in Machine Learning in MRI: From methods to clinical translation. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible

Merlin: A Vision Language Foundation Model for 3D Computed Tomography

Authors: Louis Blankemeier, Joseph Paul Cohen, Ashwin Kumar, Dave Van Veen, Syed Jamal Safdar Gardezi, Magdalini Paschali, Zhihong Chen, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Eduardo Reis, Cesar Truyts, Christian Bluethgen, Malte Engmann Kjeldskov Jensen, Sophie Ostmeier, Maya Varma, Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Zhongnan Fang, Zepeng Huo, Zaid Nabulsi, Diego Ardila, Wei-Hung Weng, Edson Amaro Junior, Neera Ahuja, Jason Fries, Nigam H. Shah, Andrew Johnston , et al. (6 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Over 85 million computed tomography (CT) scans are performed annually in the US, of which approximately one quarter focus on the abdomen. Given the current radiologist shortage, there is a large impetus to use artificial intelligence to alleviate the burden of interpreting these complex imaging studies. Prior state-of-the-art approaches for automated medical image interpretation leverage vision la… ▽ More Over 85 million computed tomography (CT) scans are performed annually in the US, of which approximately one quarter focus on the abdomen. Given the current radiologist shortage, there is a large impetus to use artificial intelligence to alleviate the burden of interpreting these complex imaging studies. Prior state-of-the-art approaches for automated medical image interpretation leverage vision language models (VLMs). However, current medical VLMs are generally limited to 2D images and short reports, and do not leverage electronic health record (EHR) data for supervision. We introduce Merlin - a 3D VLM that we train using paired CT scans (6+ million images from 15,331 CTs), EHR diagnosis codes (1.8+ million codes), and radiology reports (6+ million tokens). We evaluate Merlin on 6 task types and 752 individual tasks. The non-adapted (off-the-shelf) tasks include zero-shot findings classification (31 findings), phenotype classification (692 phenotypes), and zero-shot cross-modal retrieval (image to findings and image to impressions), while model adapted tasks include 5-year disease prediction (6 diseases), radiology report generation, and 3D semantic segmentation (20 organs). We perform internal validation on a test set of 5,137 CTs, and external validation on 7,000 clinical CTs and on two public CT datasets (VerSe, TotalSegmentator). Beyond these clinically-relevant evaluations, we assess the efficacy of various network architectures and training strategies to depict that Merlin has favorable performance to existing task-specific baselines. We derive data scaling laws to empirically assess training data needs for requisite downstream task performance. Furthermore, unlike conventional VLMs that require hundreds of GPUs for training, we perform all training on a single GPU. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures

GREEN: Generative Radiology Report Evaluation and Error Notation

Authors: Sophie Ostmeier, Justin Xu, Zhihong Chen, Maya Varma, Louis Blankemeier, Christian Bluethgen, Arne Edward Michalson, Michael Moseley, Curtis Langlotz, Akshay S Chaudhari, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck

Abstract: Evaluating radiology reports is a challenging problem as factual correctness is extremely important due to the need for accurate medical communication about medical images. Existing automatic evaluation metrics either suffer from failing to consider factual correctness (e.g., BLEU and ROUGE) or are limited in their interpretability (e.g., F1CheXpert and F1RadGraph). In this paper, we introduce GRE… ▽ More Evaluating radiology reports is a challenging problem as factual correctness is extremely important due to the need for accurate medical communication about medical images. Existing automatic evaluation metrics either suffer from failing to consider factual correctness (e.g., BLEU and ROUGE) or are limited in their interpretability (e.g., F1CheXpert and F1RadGraph). In this paper, we introduce GREEN (Generative Radiology Report Evaluation and Error Notation), a radiology report generation metric that leverages the natural language understanding of language models to identify and explain clinically significant errors in candidate reports, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Compared to current metrics, GREEN offers: 1) a score aligned with expert preferences, 2) human interpretable explanations of clinically significant errors, enabling feedback loops with end-users, and 3) a lightweight open-source method that reaches the performance of commercial counterparts. We validate our GREEN metric by comparing it to GPT-4, as well as to error counts of 6 experts and preferences of 2 experts. Our method demonstrates not only higher correlation with expert error counts, but simultaneously higher alignment with expert preferences when compared to previous approaches." △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

A Benchmark of Domain-Adapted Large Language Models for Generating Brief Hospital Course Summaries

Authors: Asad Aali, Dave Van Veen, Yamin Ishraq Arefeen, Jason Hom, Christian Bluethgen, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Sergios Gatidis, Namuun Clifford, Joseph Daws, Arash S. Tehrani, Jangwon Kim, Akshay S. Chaudhari

Abstract: Brief hospital course (BHC) summaries are common clinical documents generated by summarizing clinical notes. While large language models (LLMs) depict remarkable capabilities in automating real-world tasks, their capabilities for healthcare applications such as BHC synthesis have not been shown. To enable the adaptation of LLMs for BHC synthesis, we introduce a novel benchmark consisting of a pre-… ▽ More Brief hospital course (BHC) summaries are common clinical documents generated by summarizing clinical notes. While large language models (LLMs) depict remarkable capabilities in automating real-world tasks, their capabilities for healthcare applications such as BHC synthesis have not been shown. To enable the adaptation of LLMs for BHC synthesis, we introduce a novel benchmark consisting of a pre-processed dataset extracted from MIMIC-IV notes, encapsulating clinical note, and brief hospital course (BHC) pairs. We assess the performance of two general-purpose LLMs and three healthcare-adapted LLMs to improve BHC synthesis from clinical notes. Using clinical notes as input for generating BHCs, we apply prompting-based (using in-context learning) and fine-tuning-based adaptation strategies to three open-source LLMs (Clinical-T5-Large, Llama2-13B, FLAN-UL2) and two proprietary LLMs (GPT-3.5, GPT-4). We quantitatively evaluate the performance of these LLMs across varying context-length inputs using conventional natural language similarity metrics. We further perform a qualitative study where five diverse clinicians blindly compare clinician-written BHCs and two LLM-generated BHCs for 30 samples across metrics of comprehensiveness, conciseness, factual correctness, and fluency. Overall, we present a new benchmark and pre-processed dataset for using LLMs in BHC synthesis from clinical notes. We observe high-quality summarization performance for both in-context proprietary and fine-tuned open-source LLMs using both quantitative metrics and a qualitative clinical reader study. We propose our work as a benchmark to motivate future works to adapt and assess the performance of LLMs in BHC synthesis. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

CheXagent: Towards a Foundation Model for Chest X-Ray Interpretation

Authors: Zhihong Chen, Maya Varma, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Magdalini Paschali, Louis Blankemeier, Dave Van Veen, Jeya Maria Jose Valanarasu, Alaa Youssef, Joseph Paul Cohen, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Emily B. Tsai, Andrew Johnston, Cameron Olsen, Tanishq Mathew Abraham, Sergios Gatidis, Akshay S. Chaudhari, Curtis Langlotz

Abstract: Chest X-rays (CXRs) are the most frequently performed imaging test in clinical practice. Recent advances in the development of vision-language foundation models (FMs) give rise to the possibility of performing automated CXR interpretation, which can assist physicians with clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. However, develo** FMs that can accurately interpret CXRs is challengin… ▽ More Chest X-rays (CXRs) are the most frequently performed imaging test in clinical practice. Recent advances in the development of vision-language foundation models (FMs) give rise to the possibility of performing automated CXR interpretation, which can assist physicians with clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. However, develo** FMs that can accurately interpret CXRs is challenging due to the (1) limited availability of large-scale vision-language datasets in the medical image domain, (2) lack of vision and language encoders that can capture the complexities of medical data, and (3) absence of evaluation frameworks for benchmarking the abilities of FMs on CXR interpretation. In this work, we address these challenges by first introducing \emph{CheXinstruct} - a large-scale instruction-tuning dataset curated from 28 publicly-available datasets. We then present \emph{CheXagent} - an instruction-tuned FM capable of analyzing and summarizing CXRs. To build CheXagent, we design a clinical large language model (LLM) for parsing radiology reports, a vision encoder for representing CXR images, and a network to bridge the vision and language modalities. Finally, we introduce \emph{CheXbench} - a novel benchmark designed to systematically evaluate FMs across 8 clinically-relevant CXR interpretation tasks. Extensive quantitative evaluations and qualitative reviews with five expert radiologists demonstrate that CheXagent outperforms previously-developed general- and medical-domain FMs on CheXbench tasks. Furthermore, in an effort to improve model transparency, we perform a fairness evaluation across factors of sex, race and age to highlight potential performance disparities. Our project is at \url{https://stanford-aimi.github.io/chexagent.html}. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 24 pages, 8 figures

Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization

Authors: Dave Van Veen, Cara Van Uden, Louis Blankemeier, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Asad Aali, Christian Bluethgen, Anuj Pareek, Malgorzata Polacin, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Anna Seehofnerova, Nidhi Rohatgi, Poonam Hosamani, William Collins, Neera Ahuja, Curtis P. Langlotz, Jason Hom, Sergios Gatidis, John Pauly, Akshay S. Chaudhari

Abstract: Analyzing vast textual data and summarizing key information from electronic health records imposes a substantial burden on how clinicians allocate their time. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing (NLP), their effectiveness on a diverse range of clinical summarization tasks remains unproven. In this study, we apply adaptation methods to eight LLMs,… ▽ More Analyzing vast textual data and summarizing key information from electronic health records imposes a substantial burden on how clinicians allocate their time. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing (NLP), their effectiveness on a diverse range of clinical summarization tasks remains unproven. In this study, we apply adaptation methods to eight LLMs, spanning four distinct clinical summarization tasks: radiology reports, patient questions, progress notes, and doctor-patient dialogue. Quantitative assessments with syntactic, semantic, and conceptual NLP metrics reveal trade-offs between models and adaptation methods. A clinical reader study with ten physicians evaluates summary completeness, correctness, and conciseness; in a majority of cases, summaries from our best adapted LLMs are either equivalent (45%) or superior (36%) compared to summaries from medical experts. The ensuing safety analysis highlights challenges faced by both LLMs and medical experts, as we connect errors to potential medical harm and categorize types of fabricated information. Our research provides evidence of LLMs outperforming medical experts in clinical text summarization across multiple tasks. This suggests that integrating LLMs into clinical workflows could alleviate documentation burden, allowing clinicians to focus more on patient care. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2024; v1 submitted 14 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 27 pages, 19 figures

Journal ref: Nature Medicine, 2024

MedAlign: A Clinician-Generated Dataset for Instruction Following with Electronic Medical Records

Authors: Scott L. Fleming, Alejandro Lozano, William J. Haberkorn, Jenelle A. **dal, Eduardo P. Reis, Rahul Thapa, Louis Blankemeier, Julian Z. Genkins, Ethan Steinberg, Ashwin Nayak, Birju S. Patel, Chia-Chun Chiang, Alison Callahan, Zepeng Huo, Sergios Gatidis, Scott J. Adams, Oluseyi Fayanju, Shreya J. Shah, Thomas Savage, Ethan Goh, Akshay S. Chaudhari, Nima Aghaeepour, Christopher Sharp, Michael A. Pfeffer, Percy Liang , et al. (5 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow natural language instructions with human-level fluency suggests many opportunities in healthcare to reduce administrative burden and improve quality of care. However, evaluating LLMs on realistic text generation tasks for healthcare remains challenging. Existing question answering datasets for electronic health record (EHR) data fail to capture… ▽ More The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow natural language instructions with human-level fluency suggests many opportunities in healthcare to reduce administrative burden and improve quality of care. However, evaluating LLMs on realistic text generation tasks for healthcare remains challenging. Existing question answering datasets for electronic health record (EHR) data fail to capture the complexity of information needs and documentation burdens experienced by clinicians. To address these challenges, we introduce MedAlign, a benchmark dataset of 983 natural language instructions for EHR data. MedAlign is curated by 15 clinicians (7 specialities), includes clinician-written reference responses for 303 instructions, and provides 276 longitudinal EHRs for grounding instruction-response pairs. We used MedAlign to evaluate 6 general domain LLMs, having clinicians rank the accuracy and quality of each LLM response. We found high error rates, ranging from 35% (GPT-4) to 68% (MPT-7B-Instruct), and an 8.3% drop in accuracy moving from 32k to 2k context lengths for GPT-4. Finally, we report correlations between clinician rankings and automated natural language generation metrics as a way to rank LLMs without human review. We make MedAlign available under a research data use agreement to enable LLM evaluations on tasks aligned with clinician needs and preferences. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2023; v1 submitted 27 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

RadAdapt: Radiology Report Summarization via Lightweight Domain Adaptation of Large Language Models

Authors: Dave Van Veen, Cara Van Uden, Maayane Attias, Anuj Pareek, Christian Bluethgen, Malgorzata Polacin, Wah Chiu, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck, Juan Manuel Zambrano Chaves, Curtis P. Langlotz, Akshay S. Chaudhari, John Pauly

Abstract: We systematically investigate lightweight strategies to adapt large language models (LLMs) for the task of radiology report summarization (RRS). Specifically, we focus on domain adaptation via pretraining (on natural language, biomedical text, or clinical text) and via discrete prompting or parameter-efficient fine-tuning. Our results consistently achieve best performance by maximally adapting to… ▽ More We systematically investigate lightweight strategies to adapt large language models (LLMs) for the task of radiology report summarization (RRS). Specifically, we focus on domain adaptation via pretraining (on natural language, biomedical text, or clinical text) and via discrete prompting or parameter-efficient fine-tuning. Our results consistently achieve best performance by maximally adapting to the task via pretraining on clinical text and fine-tuning on RRS examples. Importantly, this method fine-tunes a mere 0.32% of parameters throughout the model, in contrast to end-to-end fine-tuning (100% of parameters). Additionally, we study the effect of in-context examples and out-of-distribution (OOD) training before concluding with a radiologist reader study and qualitative analysis. Our findings highlight the importance of domain adaptation in RRS and provide valuable insights toward develo** effective natural language processing solutions for clinical tasks. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2023; v1 submitted 1 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 12 pages, 10 figures. Published in ACL BioNLP. Compared to v1, v2 includes minor edits and one additional figure in the appendix. Compared to v2, v3 includes a link to the project's GitHub repository

Comp2Comp: Open-Source Body Composition Assessment on Computed Tomography

Authors: Louis Blankemeier, Arjun Desai, Juan Manuel Zambrano Chaves, Andrew Wentland, Sally Yao, Eduardo Reis, Malte Jensen, Bhanushree Bahl, Khushboo Arora, Bhavik N. Patel, Leon Lenchik, Marc Willis, Robert D. Boutin, Akshay S. Chaudhari

Abstract: Computed tomography (CT) is routinely used in clinical practice to evaluate a wide variety of medical conditions. While CT scans provide diagnoses, they also offer the ability to extract quantitative body composition metrics to analyze tissue volume and quality. Extracting quantitative body composition measures manually from CT scans is a cumbersome and time-consuming task. Proprietary software ha… ▽ More Computed tomography (CT) is routinely used in clinical practice to evaluate a wide variety of medical conditions. While CT scans provide diagnoses, they also offer the ability to extract quantitative body composition metrics to analyze tissue volume and quality. Extracting quantitative body composition measures manually from CT scans is a cumbersome and time-consuming task. Proprietary software has been developed recently to automate this process, but the closed-source nature impedes widespread use. There is a growing need for fully automated body composition software that is more accessible and easier to use, especially for clinicians and researchers who are not experts in medical image processing. To this end, we have built Comp2Comp, an open-source Python package for rapid and automated body composition analysis of CT scans. This package offers models, post-processing heuristics, body composition metrics, automated batching, and polychromatic visualizations. Comp2Comp currently computes body composition measures for bone, skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue on CT scans of the abdomen. We have created two pipelines for this purpose. The first pipeline computes vertebral measures, as well as muscle and adipose tissue measures, at the T12 - L5 vertebral levels from abdominal CT scans. The second pipeline computes muscle and adipose tissue measures on user-specified 2D axial slices. In this guide, we discuss the architecture of the Comp2Comp pipelines, provide usage instructions, and report internal and external validation results to measure the quality of segmentations and body composition measures. Comp2Comp can be found at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/Comp2Comp. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Scale-Agnostic Super-Resolution in MRI using Feature-Based Coordinate Networks

Authors: Dave Van Veen, Rogier van der Sluijs, Batu Ozturkler, Arjun Desai, Christian Bluethgen, Robert D. Boutin, Marc H. Willis, Gordon Wetzstein, David Lindell, Shreyas Vasanawala, John Pauly, Akshay S. Chaudhari

Abstract: We propose using a coordinate network decoder for the task of super-resolution in MRI. The continuous signal representation of coordinate networks enables this approach to be scale-agnostic, i.e. one can train over a continuous range of scales and subsequently query at arbitrary resolutions. Due to the difficulty of performing super-resolution on inherently noisy data, we analyze network behavior… ▽ More We propose using a coordinate network decoder for the task of super-resolution in MRI. The continuous signal representation of coordinate networks enables this approach to be scale-agnostic, i.e. one can train over a continuous range of scales and subsequently query at arbitrary resolutions. Due to the difficulty of performing super-resolution on inherently noisy data, we analyze network behavior under multiple denoising strategies. Lastly we compare this method to a standard convolutional decoder using both quantitative metrics and a radiologist study implemented in Voxel, our newly developed tool for web-based evaluation of medical images. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2022; v1 submitted 16 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Journal ref: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning. 2022

Data-Limited Tissue Segmentation using Inpainting-Based Self-Supervised Learning

Authors: Jeffrey Dominic, Nandita Bhaskhar, Arjun D. Desai, Andrew Schmidt, Elka Rubin, Beliz Gunel, Garry E. Gold, Brian A. Hargreaves, Leon Lenchik, Robert Boutin, Akshay S. Chaudhari

Abstract: Although supervised learning has enabled high performance for image segmentation, it requires a large amount of labeled training data, which can be difficult to obtain in the medical imaging field. Self-supervised learning (SSL) methods involving pretext tasks have shown promise in overcoming this requirement by first pretraining models using unlabeled data. In this work, we evaluate the efficacy… ▽ More Although supervised learning has enabled high performance for image segmentation, it requires a large amount of labeled training data, which can be difficult to obtain in the medical imaging field. Self-supervised learning (SSL) methods involving pretext tasks have shown promise in overcoming this requirement by first pretraining models using unlabeled data. In this work, we evaluate the efficacy of two SSL methods (inpainting-based pretext tasks of context prediction and context restoration) for CT and MRI image segmentation in label-limited scenarios, and investigate the effect of implementation design choices for SSL on downstream segmentation performance. We demonstrate that optimally trained and easy-to-implement inpainting-based SSL segmentation models can outperform classically supervised methods for MRI and CT tissue segmentation in label-limited scenarios, for both clinically-relevant metrics and the traditional Dice score. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: Submitted to Radiology: Artificial Intelligence

Scale-Equivariant Unrolled Neural Networks for Data-Efficient Accelerated MRI Reconstruction

Authors: Beliz Gunel, Arda Sahiner, Arjun D. Desai, Akshay S. Chaudhari, Shreyas Vasanawala, Mert Pilanci, John Pauly

Abstract: Unrolled neural networks have enabled state-of-the-art reconstruction performance and fast inference times for the accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction task. However, these approaches depend on fully-sampled scans as ground truth data which is either costly or not possible to acquire in many clinical medical imaging applications; hence, reducing dependence on data is desirab… ▽ More Unrolled neural networks have enabled state-of-the-art reconstruction performance and fast inference times for the accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction task. However, these approaches depend on fully-sampled scans as ground truth data which is either costly or not possible to acquire in many clinical medical imaging applications; hence, reducing dependence on data is desirable. In this work, we propose modeling the proximal operators of unrolled neural networks with scale-equivariant convolutional neural networks in order to improve the data-efficiency and robustness to drifts in scale of the images that might stem from the variability of patient anatomies or change in field-of-view across different MRI scanners. Our approach demonstrates strong improvements over the state-of-the-art unrolled neural networks under the same memory constraints both with and without data augmentations on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scaled images without significantly increasing the train or inference time. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

SKM-TEA: A Dataset for Accelerated MRI Reconstruction with Dense Image Labels for Quantitative Clinical Evaluation

Authors: Arjun D Desai, Andrew M Schmidt, Elka B Rubin, Christopher M Sandino, Marianne S Black, Valentina Mazzoli, Kathryn J Stevens, Robert Boutin, Christopher Ré, Garry E Gold, Brian A Hargreaves, Akshay S Chaudhari

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a cornerstone of modern medical imaging. However, long image acquisition times, the need for qualitative expert analysis, and the lack of (and difficulty extracting) quantitative indicators that are sensitive to tissue health have curtailed widespread clinical and research studies. While recent machine learning methods for MRI reconstruction and analysis have sh… ▽ More Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a cornerstone of modern medical imaging. However, long image acquisition times, the need for qualitative expert analysis, and the lack of (and difficulty extracting) quantitative indicators that are sensitive to tissue health have curtailed widespread clinical and research studies. While recent machine learning methods for MRI reconstruction and analysis have shown promise for reducing this burden, these techniques are primarily validated with imperfect image quality metrics, which are discordant with clinically-relevant measures that ultimately hamper clinical deployment and clinician trust. To mitigate this challenge, we present the Stanford Knee MRI with Multi-Task Evaluation (SKM-TEA) dataset, a collection of quantitative knee MRI (qMRI) scans that enables end-to-end, clinically-relevant evaluation of MRI reconstruction and analysis tools. This 1.6TB dataset consists of raw-data measurements of ~25,000 slices (155 patients) of anonymized patient MRI scans, the corresponding scanner-generated DICOM images, manual segmentations of four tissues, and bounding box annotations for sixteen clinically relevant pathologies. We provide a framework for using qMRI parameter maps, along with image reconstructions and dense image labels, for measuring the quality of qMRI biomarker estimates extracted from MRI reconstruction, segmentation, and detection techniques. Finally, we use this framework to benchmark state-of-the-art baselines on this dataset. We hope our SKM-TEA dataset and code can enable a broad spectrum of research for modular image reconstruction and image analysis in a clinically informed manner. Dataset access, code, and benchmarks are available at https://github.com/StanfordMIMI/skm-tea. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: Accepted to NeurIPS Datasets & Benchmarks (2021)

Noise2Recon: Enabling Joint MRI Reconstruction and Denoising with Semi-Supervised and Self-Supervised Learning

Authors: Arjun D Desai, Batu M Ozturkler, Christopher M Sandino, Robert Boutin, Marc Willis, Shreyas Vasanawala, Brian A Hargreaves, Christopher M Ré, John M Pauly, Akshay S Chaudhari

Abstract: Deep learning (DL) has shown promise for faster, high quality accelerated MRI reconstruction. However, supervised DL methods depend on extensive amounts of fully-sampled (labeled) data and are sensitive to out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts, particularly low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) acquisitions. To alleviate this challenge, we propose Noise2Recon, a model-agnostic, consistency training method fo… ▽ More Deep learning (DL) has shown promise for faster, high quality accelerated MRI reconstruction. However, supervised DL methods depend on extensive amounts of fully-sampled (labeled) data and are sensitive to out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts, particularly low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) acquisitions. To alleviate this challenge, we propose Noise2Recon, a model-agnostic, consistency training method for joint MRI reconstruction and denoising that can use both fully-sampled (labeled) and undersampled (unlabeled) scans in semi-supervised and self-supervised settings. With limited or no labeled training data, Noise2Recon outperforms compressed sensing and deep learning baselines, including supervised networks, augmentation-based training, fine-tuned denoisers, and self-supervised methods, and matches performance of supervised models, which were trained with 14x more fully-sampled scans. Noise2Recon also outperforms all baselines, including state-of-the-art fine-tuning and augmentation techniques, among low-SNR scans and when generalizing to other OOD factors, such as changes in acceleration factors and different datasets. Augmentation extent and loss weighting hyperparameters had negligible impact on Noise2Recon compared to supervised methods, which may indicate increased training stability. Our code is available at https://github.com/ad12/meddlr. △ Less

Submitted 7 October, 2022; v1 submitted 30 September, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset

Authors: Arjun D. Desai, Francesco Caliva, Claudia Iriondo, Naji Khosravan, Aliasghar Mortazi, Sachin Jambawalikar, Drew Torigian, Jutta Ellermann, Mehmet Akcakaya, Ulas Bagci, Radhika Tibrewala, Io Flament, Matthew O`Brien, Sharmila Majumdar, Mathias Perslev, Akshay Pai, Christian Igel, Erik B. Dam, Sibaji Gaj, Mingrui Yang, Kunio Nakamura, Xiaojuan Li, Cem M. Deniz, Vladimir Juras, Ravinder Regatte , et al. (4 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Purpose: To organize a knee MRI segmentation challenge for characterizing the semantic and clinical efficacy of automatic segmentation methods relevant for monitoring osteoarthritis progression. Methods: A dataset partition consisting of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar) cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Ch… ▽ More Purpose: To organize a knee MRI segmentation challenge for characterizing the semantic and clinical efficacy of automatic segmentation methods relevant for monitoring osteoarthritis progression. Methods: A dataset partition consisting of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar) cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Challenge submissions and a majority-vote ensemble were evaluated using Dice score, average symmetric surface distance, volumetric overlap error, and coefficient of variation on a hold-out test set. Similarities in network segmentations were evaluated using pairwise Dice correlations. Articular cartilage thickness was computed per-scan and longitudinally. Correlation between thickness error and segmentation metrics was measured using Pearson's coefficient. Two empirical upper bounds for ensemble performance were computed using combinations of model outputs that consolidated true positives and true negatives. Results: Six teams (T1-T6) submitted entries for the challenge. No significant differences were observed across all segmentation metrics for all tissues (p=1.0) among the four top-performing networks (T2, T3, T4, T6). Dice correlations between network pairs were high (>0.85). Per-scan thickness errors were negligible among T1-T4 (p=0.99) and longitudinal changes showed minimal bias (<0.03mm). Low correlations (<0.41) were observed between segmentation metrics and thickness error. The majority-vote ensemble was comparable to top performing networks (p=1.0). Empirical upper bound performances were similar for both combinations (p=1.0). Conclusion: Diverse networks learned to segment the knee similarly where high segmentation accuracy did not correlate to cartilage thickness accuracy. Voting ensembles did not outperform individual networks but may help regularize individual models. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2020; v1 submitted 29 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: Submitted to Radiology: Artificial Intelligence; Fixed typos

Technical Considerations for Semantic Segmentation in MRI using Convolutional Neural Networks

Authors: Arjun D. Desai, Garry E. Gold, Brian A. Hargreaves, Akshay S. Chaudhari

Abstract: High-fidelity semantic segmentation of magnetic resonance volumes is critical for estimating tissue morphometry and relaxation parameters in both clinical and research applications. While manual segmentation is accepted as the gold-standard, recent advances in deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise for efficient automatic segmentation of soft tissues. However, du… ▽ More High-fidelity semantic segmentation of magnetic resonance volumes is critical for estimating tissue morphometry and relaxation parameters in both clinical and research applications. While manual segmentation is accepted as the gold-standard, recent advances in deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise for efficient automatic segmentation of soft tissues. However, due to the stochastic nature of deep learning and the multitude of hyperparameters in training networks, predicting network behavior is challenging. In this paper, we quantify the impact of three factors associated with CNN segmentation performance: network architecture, training loss functions, and training data characteristics. We evaluate the impact of these variations on the segmentation of femoral cartilage and propose potential modifications to CNN architectures and training protocols to train these models with confidence. △ Less

Submitted 5 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Comments: Submitted to Magnetic Resonance in Medicine