-
Quality of Non-Convergent Best Response Processes in Multi-Agent Systems through Sink Equilibrium
Authors:
Rohit Konda,
Rahul Chandan,
Jason Marden
Abstract:
Examining the behavior of multi-agent systems is vitally important to many emerging distributed applications - game theory has emerged as a powerful tool set in which to do so. The main approach of game-theoretic techniques is to model agents as players in a game, and predict the emergent behavior through the relevant Nash equilibrium. The virtue from this viewpoint is that by assuming that self-i…
▽ More
Examining the behavior of multi-agent systems is vitally important to many emerging distributed applications - game theory has emerged as a powerful tool set in which to do so. The main approach of game-theoretic techniques is to model agents as players in a game, and predict the emergent behavior through the relevant Nash equilibrium. The virtue from this viewpoint is that by assuming that self-interested decision-making processes lead to Nash equilibrium, system behavior can then be captured by Nash equilibrium without studying the decision-making processes explicitly. This approach has seen success in a wide variety of domains, such as sensor coverage, traffic networks, auctions, and network coordination. However, in many other problem settings, Nash equilibrium are not necessarily guaranteed to exist or emerge from self-interested processes. Thus the main focus of the paper is on the study of sink equilibrium, which are defined as the attractors of these decision-making processes. By classifying system outcomes through a global objective function, we can analyze the resulting approximation guarantees that sink equilibrium have for a given game. Our main result is an approximation guarantee on the sink equilibrium through defining an introduced metric of misalignment, which captures how uniform agents are in their self-interested decision making. Overall, sink equilibrium are naturally occurring in many multi-agent contexts, and we display our results on their quality with respect to two practical problem settings.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Reinforcement Strategies in General Lotto Games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Strategic decisions are often made over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a competitor's success in later stages. In this paper, we study these dynamics in General Lotto games, a class of models describing the competitive allocation of resources between two opposing players. We propose a two-stage formulation where one of the players has reserved resources that can be…
▽ More
Strategic decisions are often made over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a competitor's success in later stages. In this paper, we study these dynamics in General Lotto games, a class of models describing the competitive allocation of resources between two opposing players. We propose a two-stage formulation where one of the players has reserved resources that can be strategically pre-allocated across the battlefields in the first stage of the game as reinforcements. The players then simultaneously allocate their remaining real-time resources, which can be randomized, in a decisive final stage. Our main contributions provide complete characterizations of the optimal reinforcement strategies and resulting equilibrium payoffs in these multi-stage General Lotto games. Interestingly, we determine that real-time resources are at least twice as effective as reinforcement resources when considering equilibrium payoffs.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Strategic investments in multi-stage General Lotto games
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Keith Paarporn,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In adversarial interactions, one is often required to make strategic decisions over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a player's competitive standing as well as how choices are made in later stages. In this paper, we study such scenarios in the context of General Lotto games, which models the competitive allocation of resources over multiple battlefields between two p…
▽ More
In adversarial interactions, one is often required to make strategic decisions over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a player's competitive standing as well as how choices are made in later stages. In this paper, we study such scenarios in the context of General Lotto games, which models the competitive allocation of resources over multiple battlefields between two players. We propose a two-stage formulation where one of the players has reserved resources that can be strategically pre-allocated across the battlefields in the first stage. The pre-allocation then becomes binding and is revealed to the other player. In the second stage, the players engage by simultaneously allocating their real-time resources against each other. The main contribution in this paper provides complete characterizations of equilibrium payoffs in the two-stage game, revealing the interplay between performance and the amount of resources expended in each stage of the game. We find that real-time resources are at least twice as effective as pre-allocated resources. We then determine the player's optimal investment when there are linear costs associated with purchasing each type of resource before play begins, and there is a limited monetary budget.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Strategically revealing intentions in General Lotto games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Dan Kovenock,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Strategic decision-making in uncertain and adversarial environments is crucial for the security of modern systems and infrastructures. A salient feature of many optimal decision-making policies is a level of unpredictability, or randomness, which helps to keep an adversary uncertain about the system's behavior. This paper seeks to explore decision-making policies on the other end of the spectrum -…
▽ More
Strategic decision-making in uncertain and adversarial environments is crucial for the security of modern systems and infrastructures. A salient feature of many optimal decision-making policies is a level of unpredictability, or randomness, which helps to keep an adversary uncertain about the system's behavior. This paper seeks to explore decision-making policies on the other end of the spectrum -- namely, whether there are benefits in revealing one's strategic intentions to an opponent before engaging in competition. We study these scenarios in a well-studied model of competitive resource allocation problem known as General Lotto games. In the classic formulation, two competing players simultaneously allocate their assets to a set of battlefields, and the resulting payoffs are derived in a zero-sum fashion. Here, we consider a multi-step extension where one of the players has the option to publicly pre-commit assets in a binding fashion to battlefields before play begins. In response, the opponent decides which of these battlefields to secure (or abandon) by matching the pre-commitment with its own assets. They then engage in a General Lotto game over the remaining set of battlefields. Interestingly, this paper highlights many scenarios where strategically revealing intentions can actually significantly improve one's payoff. This runs contrary to the conventional wisdom that randomness should be a central component of decision-making in adversarial environments.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2021; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The Unintended Consequences of Minimizing the Price of Anarchy in Congestion Games
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Dario Paccagnan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
This work focuses on the design of taxes in atomic congestion games, a commonly studied model for competitive resource sharing. While most related studies focus on optimizing either the worst- or best-case performance (i.e., Price of Anarchy (PoA) or Price of Stability (PoS)), we investigate whether optimizing for the PoA has consequences on the PoS. Perhaps surprisingly, our results reveal a fund…
▽ More
This work focuses on the design of taxes in atomic congestion games, a commonly studied model for competitive resource sharing. While most related studies focus on optimizing either the worst- or best-case performance (i.e., Price of Anarchy (PoA) or Price of Stability (PoS)), we investigate whether optimizing for the PoA has consequences on the PoS. Perhaps surprisingly, our results reveal a fundamental trade-off between the two performance metrics. Our main result demonstrates that the taxation rule that optimizes the PoA inherits a matching PoS, implying that the best outcome is no better than the worst outcome under such a design choice. We then study this trade-off in terms of the Pareto frontier between the PoA and PoS. Our results also establish that any taxes with PoS equal to 1 incur a much higher PoA, and that, in several well-studied cases, the untaxed setting lies strictly above the Pareto frontier.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2023; v1 submitted 13 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
A General Lotto game with asymmetric budget uncertainty
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
The General Lotto game is a popular variant of the famous Colonel Blotto game, in which two opposing players allocate limited resources over many battlefields. In this paper, we consider incomplete and asymmetric information formulations regarding the resource budgets of the players. In particular, one of the player's resource budget is common knowledge while the other player's is private. We prov…
▽ More
The General Lotto game is a popular variant of the famous Colonel Blotto game, in which two opposing players allocate limited resources over many battlefields. In this paper, we consider incomplete and asymmetric information formulations regarding the resource budgets of the players. In particular, one of the player's resource budget is common knowledge while the other player's is private. We provide complete equilibrium characterizations in the scenario where the private resource budget is drawn from an arbitrary Bernoulli distribution. We then show that these characterizations can be used to analyze a multi-stage resource assignment problem where a commander must decide how to assign resources to sub-colonels that compete against opponents in separate General Lotto games. While optimal deterministic assignments have been characterized in the literature, we broaden the context by deriving optimal (Bernoulli) randomized assignments, which induce asymmetric information General Lotto games to be played. We demonstrate that randomizing can offer a four-fold improvement in the commander's performance over deterministic assignments.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2022; v1 submitted 22 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Balancing Asymptotic and Transient Efficiency Guarantees in Set Covering Games
Authors:
Rohit Konda,
Rahul Chandan,
David Grimsman,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Game theoretic approaches have gained traction as robust methodologies for designing distributed local algorithms that induce a desired overall system configuration in multi-agent settings. However, much of the emphasis in these approaches is on providing asymptotic guarantees on the performance of a network of agents, and there is a gap in the study of efficiency guarantees along transients of th…
▽ More
Game theoretic approaches have gained traction as robust methodologies for designing distributed local algorithms that induce a desired overall system configuration in multi-agent settings. However, much of the emphasis in these approaches is on providing asymptotic guarantees on the performance of a network of agents, and there is a gap in the study of efficiency guarantees along transients of these distributed algorithms. Therefore, in this paper, we study the transient efficiency guarantees of a natural game-theoretic algorithm in the class of set covering games, which have been used to model a variety of applications. Our main results characterize the optimal utility design that maximizes the guaranteed efficiency along the transient of the natural dynamics. Furthermore, we characterize the Pareto-optimal frontier with regards to guaranteed efficiency in the transient and the asymptote under a class of game-theoretic designs. Surprisingly, we show that there exists an extreme trade-off between the long-term and short-term guarantees in that an asymptotically optimal game-theoretic design can perform arbitrarily bad in the transient.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2021; v1 submitted 7 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Mission Level Uncertainty in Multi-Agent Resource Allocation
Authors:
Rohit Konda,
Rahul Chandan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In recent years, a significant research effort has been devoted to the design of distributed protocols for the control of multi-agent systems, as the scale and limited communication bandwidth characteristic of such systems render centralized control impossible. Given the strict operating conditions, it is unlikely that every agent in a multi-agent system will have local information that is consist…
▽ More
In recent years, a significant research effort has been devoted to the design of distributed protocols for the control of multi-agent systems, as the scale and limited communication bandwidth characteristic of such systems render centralized control impossible. Given the strict operating conditions, it is unlikely that every agent in a multi-agent system will have local information that is consistent with the true system state. Yet, the majority of works in the literature assume that agents share perfect knowledge of their environment. This paper focuses on understanding the impact that inconsistencies in agents' local information can have on the performance of multi-agent systems. More specifically, we consider the design of multi-agent operations under a game theoretic lens where individual agents are assigned utilities that guide their local decision making. We provide a tractable procedure for designing utilities that optimize the efficiency of the resulting collective behavior (i.e., price of anarchy) for classes of set covering games where the extent of the information inconsistencies is known. In the setting where the extent of the informational inconsistencies is not known, we show -- perhaps surprisingly -- that underestimating the level of uncertainty leads to better price of anarchy than overestimating it.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
The Division of Assets in Multiagent Systems: A Case Study in Team Blotto Games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Multi-agent systems are designed to concurrently accomplish a diverse set of tasks at unprecedented scale. Here, the central problems faced by a system operator are to decide (i) how to divide available resources amongst the agents assigned to tasks and (ii) how to coordinate the behavior of the agents to optimize the efficiency of the resulting collective behavior. The focus of this paper is on p…
▽ More
Multi-agent systems are designed to concurrently accomplish a diverse set of tasks at unprecedented scale. Here, the central problems faced by a system operator are to decide (i) how to divide available resources amongst the agents assigned to tasks and (ii) how to coordinate the behavior of the agents to optimize the efficiency of the resulting collective behavior. The focus of this paper is on problem (i), where we seek to characterize the impact of the division of resources on the best-case efficiency of the resulting collective behavior. Specifically, we focus on a team Colonel Blotto game where there are two sub-colonels competing against a common adversary in a two battlefield environment. Here, each sub-colonel is assigned a given resource budget and is required to allocate these resources independent of the other sub-colonel. However, their success is dependent on the allocation strategy of both sub-colonels. The central focus of this manuscript is on how to divide a common pool of resources among the two sub-colonels to optimize the resulting best-case efficiency guarantees. Intuitively, one would imagine that the more balanced the division of resources, the worse the performance, as such divisions restrict the sub-colonels' ability to employ joint randomized strategies that tend to be necessary for optimizing performance guarantees. However, the main result of this paper demonstrates that this intuition is actually incorrect. A more balanced division of resources can offer better performance guarantees than a more centralized division. Hence, this paper demonstrates that the resource division problem is highly non-trivial in such enmeshed environments and worthy of significant future research efforts.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Tractable mechanisms for computing near-optimal utility functions
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Dario Paccagnan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Large scale multiagent systems must rely on distributed decision making, as centralized coordination is either impractical or impossible. Recent works approach this problem under a game theoretic lens, whereby utility functions are assigned to each of the agents with the hope that their local optimization approximates the centralized optimal solution. Yet, formal guarantees on the resulting perfor…
▽ More
Large scale multiagent systems must rely on distributed decision making, as centralized coordination is either impractical or impossible. Recent works approach this problem under a game theoretic lens, whereby utility functions are assigned to each of the agents with the hope that their local optimization approximates the centralized optimal solution. Yet, formal guarantees on the resulting performance cannot be obtained for broad classes of problems without compromising on their accuracy. In this work, we address this concern relative to the well-studied problem of resource allocation with nondecreasing concave welfare functions. We show that optimally designed local utilities achieve an approximation ratio (price of anarchy) of 1-c/e, where c is the function's curvature and e is Euler's constant. The upshot of our contributions is the design of approximation algorithms that are distributed and efficient, and whose performance matches that of the best existing polynomial-time (and centralized) schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
When showing your hand pays off: Announcing strategic intentions in Colonel Blotto games
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Keith Paarporn,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In competitive adversarial environments, it is often advantageous to obfuscate one's strategies or capabilities. However, revealing one's strategic intentions may shift the dynamics of the competition in complex ways. Can it ever be advantageous to reveal strategic intentions to an opponent? In this paper, we consider three-stage Colonel Blotto games in which one player can choose whether or not t…
▽ More
In competitive adversarial environments, it is often advantageous to obfuscate one's strategies or capabilities. However, revealing one's strategic intentions may shift the dynamics of the competition in complex ways. Can it ever be advantageous to reveal strategic intentions to an opponent? In this paper, we consider three-stage Colonel Blotto games in which one player can choose whether or not to pre-commit resources to a single battlefield before play begins. This pre-commitment is public knowledge. In response, the opponent can either secure the battlefield by matching the pre-commitment with its own forces, or withdraw. In a two-player setting, we show that a weaker player never has an incentive to pre-commit any amount of resources to a battlefield regardless of how valuable it is. We then consider a three-player setting in which two players fight against a common adversary on separate fronts. Only one of the two players facing the adversary has the option of pre-committing. We find there are instances where this player benefits from pre-committing. The analysis indicates that under non-cooperative team settings and no possibility of forming alliances, there can be incentives to publicly announce one's strategic intentions to an adversary.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2020; v1 submitted 26 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Optimal Taxes in Atomic Congestion Games
Authors:
Dario Paccagnan,
Rahul Chandan,
Bryce L Ferguson,
Jason R Marden
Abstract:
How can we design mechanisms to promote efficient use of shared resources? Here, we answer this question in relation to the well-studied class of atomic congestion games, used to model a variety of problems, including traffic routing. Within this context, a methodology for designing tolling mechanisms that minimize the system inefficiency (price of anarchy) exploiting solely local information is s…
▽ More
How can we design mechanisms to promote efficient use of shared resources? Here, we answer this question in relation to the well-studied class of atomic congestion games, used to model a variety of problems, including traffic routing. Within this context, a methodology for designing tolling mechanisms that minimize the system inefficiency (price of anarchy) exploiting solely local information is so far missing in spite of the scientific interest. In this manuscript we resolve this problem through a tractable linear programming formulation that applies to and beyond polynomial congestion games. When specializing our approach to the polynomial case, we obtain tight values for the optimal price of anarchy and corresponding tolls, uncovering an unexpected link with load balancing games. We also derive optimal tolling mechanisms that are constant with the congestion level, generalizing the results of Caragiannis et al. [ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 2010] to polynomial congestion games and beyond. Finally, we apply our techniques to compute the efficiency of the marginal cost mechanism. Surprisingly, optimal tolling mechanism using only local information perform closely to existing mechanism that utilize global information [Bilò and Vinci, ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 2019], while the marginal cost mechanism, known to be optimal in the continuous-flow model, has lower efficiency than that encountered levying no toll. All results are tight for pure Nash equilibria, and extend to coarse correlated equilibria.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2021; v1 submitted 21 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
When Smoothness is Not Enough: Toward Exact Quantification and Optimization of the Price of Anarchy
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Dario Paccagnan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
The price of anarchy (PoA) is a popular metric for analyzing the inefficiency of self-interested decision making. Although its study is widespread, characterizing the PoA can be challenging. A commonly employed approach is based on the smoothness framework, which provides tight PoA values under the assumption that the system objective consists in the sum of the agents' individual welfares. Unfortu…
▽ More
The price of anarchy (PoA) is a popular metric for analyzing the inefficiency of self-interested decision making. Although its study is widespread, characterizing the PoA can be challenging. A commonly employed approach is based on the smoothness framework, which provides tight PoA values under the assumption that the system objective consists in the sum of the agents' individual welfares. Unfortunately, several important classes of problems do not satisfy this requirement (e.g., taxation in congestion games), and our first result demonstrates that the smoothness framework does *not* tightly characterize the PoA for such settings. Motivated by this observation, this work develops a framework that achieves two chief objectives: i) to tightly characterize the PoA for such scenarios, and ii) to do so through a tractable approach. As a direct consequence, the proposed framework recovers and generalizes many existing PoA results, and enables efficient computation of incentives that optimize the PoA. We conclude by highlighting the applicability of our contributions to incentive design in congestion games and utility design in distributed welfare games.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2021; v1 submitted 18 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Characterizing the interplay between information and strength in Blotto games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate informational asymmetries in the Colonel Blotto game, a game-theoretic model of competitive resource allocation between two players over a set of battlefields. The battlefield valuations are subject to randomness. One of the two players knows the valuations with certainty. The other knows only a distribution on the battlefield realizations. However, the informed playe…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate informational asymmetries in the Colonel Blotto game, a game-theoretic model of competitive resource allocation between two players over a set of battlefields. The battlefield valuations are subject to randomness. One of the two players knows the valuations with certainty. The other knows only a distribution on the battlefield realizations. However, the informed player has fewer resources to allocate. We characterize unique equilibrium payoffs in a two battlefield setup of the Colonel Blotto game. We then focus on a three battlefield setup in the General Lotto game, a popular variant of the Colonel Blotto game. We characterize the unique equilibrium payoffs and mixed equilibrium strategies. We quantify the value of information - the difference in equilibrium payoff between the asymmetric information game and complete information game. We find information strictly improves the informed player's performance guarantee. However, the magnitude of improvement varies with the informed player's strength as well as the game parameters. Our analysis highlights the interplay between strength and information in adversarial environments.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2019; v1 submitted 8 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
When Smoothness is Not Enough: Toward Exact Quantification and Optimization of the Price-of-Anarchy
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Dario Paccagnan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Today's multiagent systems have grown too complex to rely on centralized controllers, prompting increasing interest in the design of distributed algorithms. In this respect, game theory has emerged as a valuable tool to complement more traditional techniques. The fundamental idea behind this approach is the assignment of agents' local cost functions, such that their selfish minimization attains, o…
▽ More
Today's multiagent systems have grown too complex to rely on centralized controllers, prompting increasing interest in the design of distributed algorithms. In this respect, game theory has emerged as a valuable tool to complement more traditional techniques. The fundamental idea behind this approach is the assignment of agents' local cost functions, such that their selfish minimization attains, or is provably close to, the global objective. Any algorithm capable of computing an equilibrium of the corresponding game inherits an approximation ratio that is, in the worst case, equal to its price-of-anarchy. Therefore, a successful application of the game design approach hinges on the possibility to quantify and optimize the equilibrium performance.
Toward this end, we introduce the notion of generalized smoothness, and show that the resulting efficiency bounds are significantly tighter compared to those obtained using the traditional smoothness approach. Leveraging this newly-introduced notion, we quantify the equilibrium performance for the class of local resource allocation games. Finally, we show how the agents' local decision rules can be designed in order to optimize the efficiency of the corresponding equilibria, by means of a tractable linear program.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2020; v1 submitted 24 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Optimal Price of Anarchy in Cost-Sharing Games
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Dario Paccagnan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
The design of distributed algorithms is central to the study of multiagent systems control. In this paper, we consider a class of combinatorial cost-minimization problems and propose a framework for designing distributed algorithms with a priori performance guarantees that are near-optimal. We approach this problem from a game-theoretic perspective, assigning agents cost functions such that the eq…
▽ More
The design of distributed algorithms is central to the study of multiagent systems control. In this paper, we consider a class of combinatorial cost-minimization problems and propose a framework for designing distributed algorithms with a priori performance guarantees that are near-optimal. We approach this problem from a game-theoretic perspective, assigning agents cost functions such that the equilibrium efficiency (price of anarchy) is optimized. Once agents' cost functions have been specified, any algorithm capable of computing a Nash equilibrium of the system inherits a performance guarantee matching the price of anarchy. Towards this goal, we formulate the problem of computing the price of anarchy as a tractable linear program. We then present a framework for designing agents' local cost functions in order to optimize for the worst-case equilibrium efficiency. Finally, we investigate the implications of our findings when this framework is applied to systems with convex, nondecreasing costs.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Utility Design for Distributed Resource Allocation -- Part I: Characterizing and Optimizing the Exact Price of Anarchy
Authors:
Dario Paccagnan,
Rahul Chandan,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Game theory has emerged as a fruitful paradigm for the design of networked multiagent systems. A fundamental component of this approach is the design of agents' utility functions so that their self-interested maximization results in a desirable collective behavior. In this work we focus on a well-studied class of distributed resource allocation problems where each agent is requested to select a su…
▽ More
Game theory has emerged as a fruitful paradigm for the design of networked multiagent systems. A fundamental component of this approach is the design of agents' utility functions so that their self-interested maximization results in a desirable collective behavior. In this work we focus on a well-studied class of distributed resource allocation problems where each agent is requested to select a subset of resources with the goal of optimizing a given system-level objective. Our core contribution is the development of a novel framework to tightly characterize the worst case performance of any resulting Nash equilibrium (price of anarchy) as a function of the chosen agents' utility functions. Leveraging this result, we identify how to design such utilities so as to optimize the price of anarchy through a tractable linear program. This provides us with a priori performance certificates applicable to any existing learning algorithm capable of driving the system to an equilibrium. Part II of this work specializes these results to submodular and supermodular objectives, discusses the complexity of computing Nash equilibria, and provides multiple illustrations of the theoretical findings.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2019; v1 submitted 3 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
