-
RankED: Addressing Imbalance and Uncertainty in Edge Detection Using Ranking-based Losses
Authors:
Bedrettin Cetinkaya,
Sinan Kalkan,
Emre Akbas
Abstract:
Detecting edges in images suffers from the problems of (P1) heavy imbalance between positive and negative classes as well as (P2) label uncertainty owing to disagreement between different annotators. Existing solutions address P1 using class-balanced cross-entropy loss and dice loss and P2 by only predicting edges agreed upon by most annotators. In this paper, we propose RankED, a unified ranking-…
▽ More
Detecting edges in images suffers from the problems of (P1) heavy imbalance between positive and negative classes as well as (P2) label uncertainty owing to disagreement between different annotators. Existing solutions address P1 using class-balanced cross-entropy loss and dice loss and P2 by only predicting edges agreed upon by most annotators. In this paper, we propose RankED, a unified ranking-based approach that addresses both the imbalance problem (P1) and the uncertainty problem (P2). RankED tackles these two problems with two components: One component which ranks positive pixels over negative pixels, and the second which promotes high confidence edge pixels to have more label certainty. We show that RankED outperforms previous studies and sets a new state-of-the-art on NYUD-v2, BSDS500 and Multi-cue datasets. Code is available at https://ranked-cvpr24.github.io.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2024; v1 submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
State Encoders in Reinforcement Learning for Recommendation: A Reproducibility Study
Authors:
** Huang,
Harrie Oosterhuis,
Bunyamin Cetinkaya,
Thijs Rood,
Maarten de Rijke
Abstract:
Methods for reinforcement learning for recommendation (RL4Rec) are increasingly receiving attention as they can quickly adapt to user feedback. A typical RL4Rec framework consists of (1) a state encoder to encode the state that stores the users' historical interactions, and (2) an RL method to take actions and observe rewards. Prior work compared four state encoders in an environment where user fe…
▽ More
Methods for reinforcement learning for recommendation (RL4Rec) are increasingly receiving attention as they can quickly adapt to user feedback. A typical RL4Rec framework consists of (1) a state encoder to encode the state that stores the users' historical interactions, and (2) an RL method to take actions and observe rewards. Prior work compared four state encoders in an environment where user feedback is simulated based on real-world logged user data. An attention-based state encoder was found to be the optimal choice as it reached the highest performance. However, this finding is limited to the actor-critic method, four state encoders, and evaluation-simulators that do not debias logged user data. In response to these shortcomings, we reproduce and expand on the existing comparison of attention-based state encoders (1) in the publicly available debiased RL4Rec SOFA simulator with (2) a different RL method, (3) more state encoders, and (4) a different dataset. Importantly, our experimental results indicate that existing findings do not generalize to the debiased SOFA simulator generated from a different dataset and a Deep Q-Network (DQN)-based method when compared with more state encoders.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2022; v1 submitted 10 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Does depth estimation help object detection?
Authors:
Bedrettin Cetinkaya,
Sinan Kalkan,
Emre Akbas
Abstract:
Ground-truth depth, when combined with color data, helps improve object detection accuracy over baseline models that only use color. However, estimated depth does not always yield improvements. Many factors affect the performance of object detection when estimated depth is used. In this paper, we comprehensively investigate these factors with detailed experiments, such as using ground-truth vs. es…
▽ More
Ground-truth depth, when combined with color data, helps improve object detection accuracy over baseline models that only use color. However, estimated depth does not always yield improvements. Many factors affect the performance of object detection when estimated depth is used. In this paper, we comprehensively investigate these factors with detailed experiments, such as using ground-truth vs. estimated depth, effects of different state-of-the-art depth estimation networks, effects of using different indoor and outdoor RGB-D datasets as training data for depth estimation, and different architectural choices for integrating depth to the base object detector network. We propose an early concatenation strategy of depth, which yields higher mAP than previous works' while using significantly fewer parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
